bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2025.06.16.659837

Population sparseness determines strength of Hebbian plasticity for maximal memory lifetime in associative networks

Abstract

The brain can efficiently learn and form memories based on limited exposure to stimuli. One key factor believed to support this ability is sparse coding, which can reduce overlap between representations and minimize interference. It is well known that increased sparseness can enhance memory capacity, yet its impact on the speed of learning remains poorly understood. Here we analyze the relationship between population sparseness and learning speed -- specifically, how the learning speed that maximizes memory capacity depends on the sparseness of the neural code, and how this in turn affects the networks maximal capacity. To this end, we study a feedforward network with Hebbian and homeostatic plasticity and a two-state synapse model. The network learns to associate binary input-output pattern pairs, where sparseness corresponds to a small fraction of active neurons per pattern. The learning speed is modeled as the probability of synaptic changes during learning. The results presented in this manuscript are based on both network simulations and an analytical theory that predicts expected memory capacity and optimal learning speed. For both perfect and noisy retrieval cues, we find that the optimal learning speed indeed increases with increasing pattern sparseness -- an effect that is more pronounced for input sparseness than for output sparseness. Interestingly, the optimal learning speed stays the same across different network sizes if the number of active units in an input pattern is kept constant. While the capacity obtained at optimal learning speed increases monotonically with output sparseness, its dependence on input sparseness is non-monotonic. Overall, we provide the first detailed investigation of the interactions between population sparseness, learning speed, and storage capacity. Our findings propose that differences in population sparseness across brain regions may underlie observed differences in how quickly those regions adapt and learn. Author summaryThe brain can efficiently learn and form memories based on limited exposure to stimuli. One key factor believed to support this ability is the way neural circuits encode and organize information about the external world. Population sparseness refers to the phenomenon in which, in many brain regions, only a small subset of neurons is active at any given time or in response to a particular stimulus. Sparse codes are believed to reduce overlap between representations and minimize interference and can thus enhance the storage capacity of a network. Here we investigate the effect of population sparseness on the speed of learning input-output associations in a network model with Hebbian learning. We find that the learning speed that yields the maximal capacity increases with increasing sparseness. The maximal capacity increases for sparser input and output representations but in the first case only up to a certain point before sparseness becomes destructive. These findings could contribute to explaining why some brain regions learn faster than others.

Source connections

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Auer, N., Chen, L., Stubenrauch, J., Lindner, B., Kempter, R.. 2025-06-16. Population sparseness determines strength of Hebbian plasticity for maximal memory lifetime in associative networks. https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.06.16.659837

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Cell Types in Describing Neuronal Physiological Features

Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) captures detailed gene expression profiles at scale, while patch-clamp recordings measure intrinsic neuronal electrophysiological properties. Modeling the relations between these two modalities remains a challenge. Here, we compare how well electrophysiological features can be predicted by traditional transcriptomic cell type classification, representations derived from a foundational model (scGPT) pretrained on large-scale scRNA-seq datasets, ion channel-coding genes, and highly variable genes. Using paired transcriptomic and electrophysiological patch-sequencing data from 495 human neurons from neurosurgical tissue, we find that cluster-level cell type representations consistently outperform highly variable gene selection, ion channel gene selection, and context-enriched scGPT embeddings. Notably, performance varies across model architectures and initializations, and the best results are obtained by combining the outputs of separate cell type and scGPT-based models. Together, these findings suggest that traditional discrete cellular classification is highly effective in predicting physiological features. For maximum performance it can be complemented by pretrained transformer models.

neuroscience↗

A nonlinear inhibition pathway underlying cortical responses to tuned holographic optogenetic perturbations

Optogenetics enables causal manipulation of cortical activity. Perturbation responses can be counterintuitive due to network interactions, making theory essential for predicting them. Existing approaches often rely on linear approximations, which fail for many biologically relevant perturbations. Here we develop a nonlinear theory of responses to holographic perturbations in cell-type-specific recurrent networks with structured connectivity. We fit a nonlinear model to mouse V1 data, which shows cotuned-ensemble suppression: perturbing spatially clustered neurons with similar preferred orientations yields markedly stronger short-range suppression than perturbing untuned ensembles. We show that cotuned-ensemble suppression arises from a feature-tuned, nonlinear inhibition pathway implicating somatostatin-positive (SST) interneurons. The theory predicts that cotuned ensembles suppress parvalbumin-positive (PV) neurons but facilitate SST neurons, and links the degree of cotuned-ensemble suppression or facilitation to the variance of the SST response. This framework identifies mechanisms by which nonlinear inhibition sculpts cortical dynamics and establishes a predictive basis for targeted optogenetic interventions.

neuroscience↗

Proteomic signatures of APOE ε4 across human tissues and cell types in Alzheimers disease

The apolipoprotein E {varepsilon}4 (APOE {varepsilon}4) allele is the strongest genetic risk factor for late-onset Alzheimers disease (AD). However, the underlying molecular mechanisms remain unclear. This study included 1691 participants from the Religious Orders Study and Rush Memory and Aging Project (ROSMAP), 1226 participants from the Accelerating Medicines Partnership - Alzheimers Disease (AMP-AD) Diverse Cohorts Study, and 735 participants from the Alzheimers Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI). To characterise APOE {varepsilon}4 molecular effects, we analysed proteomic data from plasma, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived astrocytes and neurons, as well as transcriptomic and proteomic data from multiple brain regions. The association of APOE {varepsilon}4 with AD neuropathology was also examined. APOE {varepsilon}4 carriers shared a plasma proteomic signature enriched for immune processes, irrespective of AD diagnosis. A machine learning classifier trained on this signature discriminated APOE {varepsilon}4 carriers from non-carriers in an independent cohort using CSF proteomics. APOE {varepsilon}4 carriage was associated with higher Braak stages and Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimers Disease (CERAD) score. However, only limited APOE {varepsilon}4-associated transcriptomic and proteomic changes were observed in bulk brain tissue, with poor cross-layer concordance. Proteomic analyses of iPSC-derived astrocytes and neurons further revealed cell-type-specific APOE {varepsilon}4-associated changes. APOE {varepsilon}4 is associated with a consistent proteomic signature across plasma and CSF. Its molecular effects in the brain differ across cell types, brain regions and molecular layers. These findings support the need for cell-type-resolved multi-omic studies to elucidate how APOE {varepsilon}4 confers AD risk.

neuroscience↗