bioRxiv · 10.1101/2025.04.27.649519
Assessment of Reported Error Rates in Crosslinking Mass Spectrometry
Abstract
We benchmarked eight software tools in crosslinking mass spectrometry (MS) to evaluate their accuracy in detecting protein-protein interactions. Whereas about half performed reliably, others reported up to 31-fold more false interactions than indicated by their reported false discovery rates. During this community-driven effort, we helped correct one of the poorer-performing tools. Our findings demonstrate that, with robust algorithms, crosslinking MS can deliver highly dependable insights into biological systems.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Rappsilber, J., Fischer, L., Lenz, S., Kolbowski, L., bruce, j. e., Chalkley, R. J., Hoopmann, M. R., Keller, A., Moritz, R. L., Shteynberg, D., Trnka, M., Viner, R.. 2025-04-28. Assessment of Reported Error Rates in Crosslinking Mass Spectrometry. https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.04.27.649519
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.