bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2025.04.17.649359

Croaking for haste: How long does it take to describe a frog species since its discovery?

Abstract

Global biodiversity faces severe anthropogenic threats, with alarming extinction rates projected for the near future. Most of Earths diversity remains undescribed, meaning countless species are doomed to extinction before being documented. Since current conservation laws consider only described species, the time to achieve a representative inventory of global biodiversity is crucial for effective conservation. Amphibians, the most endangered vertebrate class, exemplify the challenge: while the number of threatened species rises, new species descriptions rapidly increase, and hundreds of candidate species are flagged annually worldwide. We analyzed all anuran species described from the year 2000 to 2023 across four biodiversity-rich tropical regions to investigate the time required to describe new frog species. We quantified the time needed to collect the type series, the number and timing of expeditions, the lag between collection and publication of the species description, and the total time. Additionally, we explored temporal trends and the effect of selected abiotic variables. On average, it takes 11.3 years to formally describe a frog species since the collection of the first specimen, with 4.5 years spent on specimen collection and 6.8 years on description and publication. These figures were consistent across three of the four regions analyzed. Alarmingly, the time required to describe new species is globally increasing, exacerbating the so-called taxonomic impediment. Only 36% of species were described within five years of collection, highlighting the importance of biological collections as reservoirs of undescribed diversity while also calling for specimen revision after expeditions. These results raise concerns about the effectiveness of current taxonomic and conservation practices in addressing the biodiversity crisis. We call for a global effort to prioritize taxonomic research and discuss innovative taxonomic and conservation approaches. Under current practices, and given the observed timelines, we will lose the race against extinction for many species.

Source connections

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Carne, A., Sanchez-Vialas, A., Lansac, C., Moreno, M., De la Riva, I. J.. 2025-04-22. Croaking for haste: How long does it take to describe a frog species since its discovery?. https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.04.17.649359

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Increasing threat: Rhynchophorus ferrugineus invaded mainland America through Uruguay.

Rhynchophorus ferrugineus (Olivier) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) is one of the most dangerous palm pests worldwide. Here we report the invasion process of R. ferrugineus in Uruguay. Beyond morphological and molecular identification, we infer the geographic origin of the invasive population, describe the succession of introduced and native palms attacked, provide an easy-to-use key to differentiate the invader R. ferrugineus from the native Rhynchophorus palmarum, and model the ecological niche of R. ferrugineus in Uruguay and neighboring countries. First detected in 2022, the Uruguayan population of the weevil is the first to establish on mainland America, following the earlier island records from Curacao and Aruba. Phylogenetic analysis showed that the Uruguayan R. ferrugineus sequences clustered within a single clade, most closely related to sequences from southern China, and clearly distinct from the sequences of Curacao and Aruba, indicating at least two independent introduction events into the Americas from different source regions. After four years, R. ferrugineus has spread across an area of nearly 80,000 square kilometers and in January 2026 it reached Argentina, invading two points near the border with Uruguay. Over the first two years after the invasion, attacks focused on Phoenix canariensis, yet the three most common native palms in Uruguay, Butia odorata, Butia yatay, and Syagrus romanzoffiana, are currently being attacked. The diagnostic key to differentiate the pair R. palmarum / R. ferrugineus is based on three characters: the tip of the rostrum, the tegminal plate, and the ratio between the interocular space and the width of the rostrum at the base. Niche models showed that Uruguay and the neighboring areas of Argentina and Brazil are suitable for R. ferrugineus, and these are precisely the areas where both the highly susceptible P. canariensis and the native B. odorata, B. yatay, and S. romanzoffiana are present. Neighboring countries should therefore be prepared for the expansion of R. ferrugineus in the short term.

zoology↗

The evaluation of the SumiOne™ spatial emanators against wild Anopheles funestus in experimental huts in Siaya County, western Kenya

Background Spatial Emanators (SEs) are a promising tool for complementing existing malaria vector control interventions. In 2025, the World Health Organization (WHO) issued a conditional recommendation for SEs, and two transfluthrin-based products were added to the WHO Prequalification List. As SEs are scaled up, additional products are needed to ensure reliable supply, competitive pricing, and continued innovation. Methods This study evaluated the efficacy of SumiOne SE, containing 10% metofluthrin, in experimental huts in Siaya County, western Kenya. SumiOne SE efficacy was evaluated in six experimental huts, three intervention and three control, using human landing catches (HLCs) and aspiration. Collections were conducted in two 12-night phases, alternating between HLC and aspiration every six nights. Outcomes included reductions in human landing rates, density, exophily and blood feeding inhibition of Anopheles mosquitoes. Results SumiOne SE significantly reduced indoor densities of An. funestus with 63% protective effect (IRR = 0.37, 95% CI: 0.20-0.69, p = 0.0087). Overall An. funestus density (indoor and outdoor combined) was reduced by 58% (IRR=0.42, 95% CI: 0.22-0.79; p=0.0222). The rate of exophily of An. funestus exiting was 34% (95% CI: 27-42) in the intervention huts compared to 2% (95% CI: 1-4) in the control huts (p< 0.0001). Blood feeding inhibition for An. funestus was 46% with 44% (95% CI: 36-51) of the collected mosquitoes being blood fed in the intervention huts compared to 81% (95% CI: 76-86) blood fed in the control huts, (p<0.0001). Conclusion These findings support SumiOne SEs potential as a complementary vector control tool, alongside existing core interventions such as Insecticide Treated Nets and Indoor Residual Spraying, particularly in contexts where additional protection is needed.

zoology↗

Phylogeny is not taxonomy: lessons on higher classification from turtle and whale barnacles (Cirripedia: Coronuloidea)

Phylogeny and taxonomy are related but not identical: phylogeny estimates common ancestry, whereas taxonomy must also provide diagnosable, stable, informative, and useful classifications. We examine this distinction using turtle and whale barnacles of the superfamily Coronuloidea, a group with an extensive fossil record, marked ecological specialization, a long history of morphology-based classification, and a recent topology-driven reclassification that merged recognized higher taxa to preserve monophyly. These changes reduced diagnosability and biological coherence, weakened historical continuity, and relied on placements insufficiently tested against morphological and phylogenetic evidence. Our reanalysis of published molecular datasets shows that critical relationships are sensitive to marker composition and taxon sampling. Together with morphological considerations on extant and fossil forms, these results indicate that topology alone is insufficient for coherent higher classification. We argue that higher taxa should be evaluated using complementary criteria: diagnosability, stability, utility, and monophyly, rather than by mechanically translating a preferred tree into Linnaean ranks.

zoology↗