bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2025.04.17.649315

μSeq: Universal mutation rate quantification via deep sequencing of a single clonal expansion.

Abstract

Understanding and quantifying mutational processes is fundamental for studying evolution in both clinical and experimental contexts. However, current methods are labor intensive and often lack robustness, particularly in mammalian cells. For example, current approaches that rely on subclonal mutations derived directly from patient samples often result in inconsistent or biased outcomes, leading to potentially unreliable conclusions on adaptive dynamics. We used patient-derived colorectal cancer organoids to introduce {micro}Seq, a universal framework for inferring mutation rates in diverse biological systems. Our approach extracts mutation rates from deep sequencing of single clonal expansions, with a time gain of ten-fold or more compared to a mutation accumulation line, at the cost of three billion read whole genome sequencing. {micro}Seq relies on four critical components: (i) a controlled experimental setup enabling validation (ii) a quantitative estimate inspired by the classic Luria-Delbruck spectrum for subclonal mutations derived from population dynamics, (iii) robust statistical models accounting for sampling noise and sequencing errors, and (iv) a data analysis pipeline for subclonal mutation detection that compares endpoint populations to a closely related ancestor. Building on the legacy of Luria and Delbruck, our model adopts core concepts from statistical physics--stochasticity, fluctuation spectra, and inference under noise--to construct a rigorous and scalable inference framework. We demonstrate that the Luria-Delbruck distribution extends to subclonal mutations in expanding populations, and show how this generalization enables robust estimation of the underlying mutation rate. Our models establish precise requirements for sequencing depth, genome size, and mutation frequency detection necessary for accurate mutation rate estimates. Crucially, we show that failing to meet these criteria can lead to errors spanning several orders of magnitude suggesting that biases in patients data arise from analyzing incorrect frequency intervals and from lack of a closely related reference. We validate our approach using parallel mutation accumulation experiments in colorectal cancer organoids, finding mutation rate estimates consistent with previous studies. However, we find that mutation accumulation lines operate under purifying selection in both yeast and human organoids, contradicting the long standing assumption of neutrality in such experiments. This insight has important implications for both evolutionary biology and cancer evolution. Finally, to demonstrate the adaptability of {micro}Seq, we apply it to yeast, leveraging multiple independent replicates to compensate for its much smaller genome, as well as in mouse xenografts, which feature much more complex in vivo population dynamics. The robustness and broad applicability of {micro}Seq establish it as a powerful and universal tool for mutation rate quantification, and imply that existing claims based on subclonal mutations from patient samples must be revisited. Short AbstractUnderstanding and quantifying mutational processes is fundamental to studying evolution in clinical and experimental contexts. However, current methods are labor intensive and often lack robustness, particularly in mammalian cells. For example, quantification of subclonal mutations directly from patient samples produces inconsistent estimates, leading to unreliable conclusions about adaptive dynamics. Using patient derived colorectal cancer organoids as a model system, we developed {micro}Seq, a novel framework to estimate mutation rates from deep sequencing of a single clonal expansion with a close reference. {micro}Seq builds on the Luria Delbruck model, combining statistical physics concepts with modern sequencing and inference techniques. It integrates (i) a controlled experimental setup, (ii) robust statistical and population dynamics models, and (iii) a data analysis pipeline for subclonal mutation detection. We establish precise requirements for sequencing depth, genome size, and mutation frequency to ensure accuracy despite sequencing errors. {micro}Seq enables accurate estimation of mutation rates as low as 10-9 mutations per base pair per generation, and we validate it across species using yeast data. Critically, {micro}Seq reveals that mutation accumulation lines undergo purifying selection in both human organoids and yeast, It underscores the need to reconsider claims based on subclonal mutations in patient samples.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Pompei, S., Geroldi, A., Rivetti, P., Grassi, E., Vurchio, V., Tallarico, G., Corti, G., Tattini, L., Liti, G., Bertotti, A., Cosentino Lagomarsino, M.. 2025-04-22. μSeq: Universal mutation rate quantification via deep sequencing of a single clonal expansion.. https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.04.17.649315

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Ocean current models predict spatial structure for coastal biodiversity

Genomic diversity provides the raw material through which all evolutionary processes occur. Accurately describing how environmental features affect patterns of diversity shows promise in predicting the resilience of populations and entire communities to dynamic environments and novel stressors. Identifying the contribution of purely neutral responses to environmental effects can be difficult, especially across large spatial ranges with many covarying environmental features. Using an individual-based model of larvae carried by ocean currents, we predict patterns of neutral genomic diversity in a passively dispersed coastal species, suggesting large geographic regions of relative homogeneity with ancestry determined by the nearest "upstream" population with limited larval input. The genomic identity that dominates each region sharply transitions at the next such interruption, generating hierarchical structure and violating assumptions of isolation-by-distance. We call these upstream populations "lineage source regions" (LSRs), and we find strong concordance between LSR model predictions and an empirical population genomic survey of a keystone salt marsh mussel (Geukensia demissa). We quantitatively validate model performance and goodness-of-fit, updating baseline predictions of genomic diversity patterns from the classic isolation-by-distance model to this LSR framework. This spatially explicit coastal ancestry model has potential for generalization across passive dispersing species.

evolutionary biology↗

TaxaAudit: A statistical model of consensus in phylogenetics identifies non-monophyletic taxa

Interpreting variation in genes and traits across species requires understanding their evolutionary relationships. Taxonomic hierarchies provide a practical approximation of the tree of life, with the NCBI taxonomy linking this framework directly to public sequence data. Some named groups, however, are not evolutionary clades, and recognizing these exceptions requires knowledge scattered across the phylogenetics literature. Here we introduce TaxaAudit, a statistical model that identifies taxonomic groups whose monophyly is repeatedly contradicted by published phylogenies. The model accounts for background taxonomic conflict and the ability of each study's species sampling to expose non-monophyly. Applied to 5,865 molecular phylogenies from TimeTree, TaxaAudit flagged 516 NCBI taxa at family rank and below for significant recurrent contradiction of monophyly. Excluding these taxa's monophyly requirements improved the taxonomy's agreement with independent phylogenomic reference trees and phylogenies withheld from discovery. Flagged taxa were also 3.61 times as likely as matched controls to have their monophyly challenged in publications outside the discovery set. In tree-inference experiments, excluding these monophyly constraints improved agreement with reference phylogenies relative to enforcing the unmodified taxonomy. By identifying groups whose monophyly should not be assumed, TaxaAudit lets researchers draw on published phylogenetic knowledge without reviewing the specialist literature for every taxon. This supports broader use of the NCBI taxonomy as an evolutionary framework for biological comparisons.

evolutionary biology↗

Shared landscape, divergent genomes: Comparative population genomics of co-occurring flora in an isolated Australian mountain range

Understanding how landscape heterogeneity shapes genomic variation is key to conserving biodiversity and evolutionary potential. Yet conservation genomics is typically conducted at the single species level, limiting our ability to identify shared genomic patterns or understand how co-occurring taxa differ in their response to common environmental gradients. We assessed spatial patterns of genomic variation and their associations with geographic and environmental features among populations of nine co-existing plant species with contrasting life-histories and ecological traits across Gariwerd, a threatened biodiversity hotspot in south-eastern Australia. All species exhibited weak overall genetic structure, although the magnitude and spatial distribution of differentiation varied among species. Despite this variation, broadly consistent spatial trends were apparent, with higher genomic divergence largely concentrated in central zones and higher genomic diversity localised in southern regions of the landscape. Significant associations between genetic differentiation and geographic distance were observed in three species, while another species showed associations with environmental distance. These findings demonstrate that coexisting species can show overlapping spatial patterns in genomic variation while differing markedly in their associations with geographic and environmental variation across the same landscape. This comparative approach provides a basis for spatial prioritisation and conservation planning, while highlighting the complex eco-evolutionary processes operating across heterogeneous landscapes.

evolutionary biology↗