bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2025.04.16.649208

Biophysical mechanisms of default mode network function and dysfunction

Abstract

The default mode network (DMN) plays a fundamental role in internally focused cognition, and its disruption is implicated in numerous brain disorders. While neuroimaging has revealed DMN suppression by salient stimuli, the cellular mechanisms orchestrating this process remain unknown. Using whole-brain computational modeling informed by neuronal biophysics and retrograde tracer-derived directional mouse brain connectomics, we demonstrate that stimulation of the insula node of the salience network suppresses DMN activity, whereas cingulate cortex stimulation produces antagonistic effects, enhancing retrosplenial cortex activity. Prelimbic cortex stimulation showed intermediate patterns, partially replicating insula-mediated suppression while failing to suppress cingulate regions, suggesting its role as a functional bridge between networks. Systematic brain-wide analysis confirmed the insulas unique pattern of simulated DMN suppression. Comprehensive parameter space exploration demonstrated that DMN emergence as a functionally segregated network is robust across wide ranges of excitatory-inhibitory balance regimes and cholinergic modulation. However, outside these boundaries, DMN integrity breaks down through three distinct failure modes: loss of responsiveness, reversal of suppression to enhancement, and network fragmentation. The retrosplenial cortex emerged as a particularly vulnerable regulatory hub whose excitatory-inhibitory disruption reversed normal suppression patterns across the DMN, while prelimbic cortex demonstrated remarkable robustness. Brain-wide analysis also identified a functionally segregated frontal network displaying antagonistic dynamics with the DMN. Our findings provide mechanistic insights into DMN robustness and vulnerability, establishing a framework that links cellular excitatory-inhibitory balance to large-scale network dynamics. This model could explain how region-specific disruptions can produce the heterogeneous patterns of DMN dysfunction observed across brain disorders. Significance StatementTo respond to important external events, the brain must suppress internal thought processes implicating the default mode network. This suppression fails in psychiatric conditions, that also involve imbalances between excitatory and inhibitory neurons. However, the connection between cellular imbalances and default-mode-network dysfunction has remained unclear. We used brain-wide computer simulations incorporating neuronal properties to understand how imbalance at the cellular scale disrupts network function. Our simulations reveal the precise excitatory-inhibitory balance needed for normal suppression. Additionally, we identified distinct failure modes and discovered that certain brain hubs are more vulnerable than others to disruption. Our findings reveal how cellular alterations scale up to cause network-level dysfunction, potentially guiding treatments targeting specific brain regions in individual patients.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Nghiem, T.-A. E., Menon, V.. 2025-04-21. Biophysical mechanisms of default mode network function and dysfunction. https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.04.16.649208

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Cell Types in Describing Neuronal Physiological Features

Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) captures detailed gene expression profiles at scale, while patch-clamp recordings measure intrinsic neuronal electrophysiological properties. Modeling the relations between these two modalities remains a challenge. Here, we compare how well electrophysiological features can be predicted by traditional transcriptomic cell type classification, representations derived from a foundational model (scGPT) pretrained on large-scale scRNA-seq datasets, ion channel-coding genes, and highly variable genes. Using paired transcriptomic and electrophysiological patch-sequencing data from 495 human neurons from neurosurgical tissue, we find that cluster-level cell type representations consistently outperform highly variable gene selection, ion channel gene selection, and context-enriched scGPT embeddings. Notably, performance varies across model architectures and initializations, and the best results are obtained by combining the outputs of separate cell type and scGPT-based models. Together, these findings suggest that traditional discrete cellular classification is highly effective in predicting physiological features. For maximum performance it can be complemented by pretrained transformer models.

neuroscience↗

A nonlinear inhibition pathway underlying cortical responses to tuned holographic optogenetic perturbations

Optogenetics enables causal manipulation of cortical activity. Perturbation responses can be counterintuitive due to network interactions, making theory essential for predicting them. Existing approaches often rely on linear approximations, which fail for many biologically relevant perturbations. Here we develop a nonlinear theory of responses to holographic perturbations in cell-type-specific recurrent networks with structured connectivity. We fit a nonlinear model to mouse V1 data, which shows cotuned-ensemble suppression: perturbing spatially clustered neurons with similar preferred orientations yields markedly stronger short-range suppression than perturbing untuned ensembles. We show that cotuned-ensemble suppression arises from a feature-tuned, nonlinear inhibition pathway implicating somatostatin-positive (SST) interneurons. The theory predicts that cotuned ensembles suppress parvalbumin-positive (PV) neurons but facilitate SST neurons, and links the degree of cotuned-ensemble suppression or facilitation to the variance of the SST response. This framework identifies mechanisms by which nonlinear inhibition sculpts cortical dynamics and establishes a predictive basis for targeted optogenetic interventions.

neuroscience↗

Proteomic signatures of APOE ε4 across human tissues and cell types in Alzheimers disease

The apolipoprotein E {varepsilon}4 (APOE {varepsilon}4) allele is the strongest genetic risk factor for late-onset Alzheimers disease (AD). However, the underlying molecular mechanisms remain unclear. This study included 1691 participants from the Religious Orders Study and Rush Memory and Aging Project (ROSMAP), 1226 participants from the Accelerating Medicines Partnership - Alzheimers Disease (AMP-AD) Diverse Cohorts Study, and 735 participants from the Alzheimers Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI). To characterise APOE {varepsilon}4 molecular effects, we analysed proteomic data from plasma, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived astrocytes and neurons, as well as transcriptomic and proteomic data from multiple brain regions. The association of APOE {varepsilon}4 with AD neuropathology was also examined. APOE {varepsilon}4 carriers shared a plasma proteomic signature enriched for immune processes, irrespective of AD diagnosis. A machine learning classifier trained on this signature discriminated APOE {varepsilon}4 carriers from non-carriers in an independent cohort using CSF proteomics. APOE {varepsilon}4 carriage was associated with higher Braak stages and Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimers Disease (CERAD) score. However, only limited APOE {varepsilon}4-associated transcriptomic and proteomic changes were observed in bulk brain tissue, with poor cross-layer concordance. Proteomic analyses of iPSC-derived astrocytes and neurons further revealed cell-type-specific APOE {varepsilon}4-associated changes. APOE {varepsilon}4 is associated with a consistent proteomic signature across plasma and CSF. Its molecular effects in the brain differ across cell types, brain regions and molecular layers. These findings support the need for cell-type-resolved multi-omic studies to elucidate how APOE {varepsilon}4 confers AD risk.

neuroscience↗