bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2025.03.24.644849

Dissecting the steps in early Simian Immunodeficiency Virus dissemination following mucosal and intravenous infection of rhesus macaques

Abstract

In cases of HIV transmission, the typical delay from exposure to detectable viremia is approximately one week. This delay from exposure to viremia suggests that during initial expansion of virus from a limited number of founder lineages, there exists a period of low infected cell population. It is during this period of low infected cell population that the virus may be more vulnerable to clearance via primed immune responses targeting infected cells (e.g., antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) or CD8+ T cell killing/suppression). Potential future prophylactic harnessing of these immune mechanisms for early virally infected cell clearance will rely on an understanding of the earliest stages of viral replication and dissemination. The factors that dictate the rate of early viral spread, termed the dissemination bottleneck could include target-cell-mediated effects, the anatomical microenvironment, or the organ of the first infected cells. In this study, we use the barcoded Simian Immunodeficiency Virus (SIV) infection model to assess the contribution of various anatomical and cellular mechanisms to the SIV dissemination bottleneck. Viral, cellular, and anatomically-mediated heterogeneity in viral replication each introduce a degree of variability into the early phases of viral spread, and when multiple founder lineages are present, this variability in early growth results in a large distribution in lineage sizes. Therefore, we use a comparison of viral lineage size variability across multiple experimental SIV infection models to examine the relative contribution to the overall dissemination bottleneck of viral-mediated stochasticity of cellular infection (e.g., integration site), infected cell phenotype (e.g., activation state), anatomical variability, and initial viral spread within the genital tract. We estimate that inherent heterogeneity in viral production by infected cells corresponds to 23 to 44% of the dissemination bottleneck, but the majority (56 to 77%) arises from anatomical heterogeneity (presumably heterogeneity in how conducive local microenvironments are to viral replication). Author SummaryA brief window exists immediately following HIV transmission where low initial levels of virus and infected cells may be susceptible to immune clearance. A better understanding of the bottlenecks encountered by the virus during this window is necessary when designing therapies to clear HIV during this early period. We used a barcoded Simian Immunodeficiency Virus (SIV) infection model to track the early dissemination of multiple viral lineages after mucosal and intravenous inoculation. We observed up to 105-fold differences in lineage size between transmitted barcodes within a single animal two weeks after infection, suggesting very different trajectories of virial growth. By comparing lineage size diversity after mucosal and intravenous transmission and in vitro replication, we determined the contribution of anatomical and cellular mechanisms to the relative growth of different clonotypes. Although we expected that the processes of local dissemination may lead to greater lineage size diversity after mucosal transmission, this was not the case, and we saw no difference compared to intravenous transmission. We found that around a quarter of the diversity in clonotype size could be attributed to early cellular infection events, with the remainder likely attributable to differences in clonotype specific establishment and dissemination in vivo.

Source connections

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Docken, S. S., Macairan, A., Schlub, T. E., Fennessey, C. M., Varco-Merth, B., Picker, L. J., Okoye, A. A., Immonen, T. T., Cromer, D., Keele, B. F., Davenport, M. P.. 2025-03-28. Dissecting the steps in early Simian Immunodeficiency Virus dissemination following mucosal and intravenous infection of rhesus macaques. https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.03.24.644849

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

AF3 Inspector: In-Browser 3D Model Visualization and Confidence Analytics for AlphaFold 3

AlphaFold 3 (AF3) has broadened the computational structural biology landscape by predicting all-atom complexes across proteins, nucleic acids, small-molecule ligands, and ions, including chemical modifications. For non-experts, Google provides a fully web-based service to utilize AlphaFold 3. Unfortunately, despite a flexible and rich interface for inputs, the server's outputs are incomplete and complicated for many users, as witnessed hands-on. Not all confidence metrics are displayed, and those that are shown do not present much interactivity; besides, only model number 1 is shown among the 5 produced by the software, and upon download the user finds the models are provided only in CIF format, which is not yet well-known especially among highly practical users. Here, we present the AlphaFold 3 Multi-Model Inspector (AF3 Inspector, https://pdbms.altervista.org/af3viewer/afviewer8.html), an open, client-side, zero-install web application designed to dissect, align, and interactively explore the complete ensemble of structural models produced by AlphaFold 3. Part of the PDB Manipulation Suite (https://pdbms.altervista.org/), the AF3 Inspector operates entirely within web browsers, meaning it is available out of the box in all devices and operating systems. AF3 Inspector delivers 3D visualization in various styles and colors for all models, overlay with backbone alignment if requested, interactive plots for pLDDT profiles, pAE matrices and contact maps, chain-pair interaction heatmaps, automated detection of ligands, ions and post-translational modifications, and rapid mmCIF-to-PDB conversion allowing users to download the more familiar files. The platform addresses critical practical considerations highlighted in recent community benchmarks, such as CASP16, and extends the lightweight, client-side biophysical toolkit paradigm established by the PDB Manipulation Suite (PDBMS).

bioinformatics↗

PanVasc Research for AI assisted evidence analysis in panvascular intervention

Panvascular intervention research requires evidence workflows that preserve source identity, outcome definitions and observation windows. We developed PanVasc Research, an executable research framework, and evaluated a fixed local Qwen3-4B model using two complementary tasks. Fifty ClinicalTrials.gov records from five vascular query strata generated 200 source-fidelity tests with intact evidence or controlled removal of the requested source, primary outcome or timeframe, plus 50 clean controls. A separate 100-statement sample from the official NLI4CT test set assessed clinical-trial entailment and evidence selection against existing expert labels. Generic and checklist prompts used identical evidence and maximum generation budgets; each output was also evaluated with an input-only deterministic contract. Registry exact accuracy was 51/200 (25.5%) with the generic prompt and 77/200 (38.5%) with the checklist; intact-case agreement was 50/50 and 48/50. The rule baseline recovered 200/200 tuples. NLI label accuracy was 48/100 (48.0%) and 50/100 (50.0%), respectively. The source contract retained 35 and 31 incorrect NLI labels in the two arms. Registry references establish fidelity to a registration snapshot, while NLI4CT concerns breast-cancer trials and does not validate vascular expertise. The framework also retains provenance-recorded literature retrieval, structured research planning and local numerical analysis. These experiments support a bounded assessment of source handling and semantic failure, rather than a new foundation model or autonomous scientific discovery. A proposed endpoint representation identifies the additional domain annotation and independent validation required for a panvascular research model.

bioinformatics↗

BiomiX 3.0: A user-friendly platform for democratized multi-omics integration with graph-based learning.

Background Multi-omics integration has emerged as a powerful strategy to decode the molecular complexity of biological systems. However, the diversity of available methods, each designed with distinct assumptions, objectives, and computational requirements, makes method selection, usage and interpretation challenging for nonexpert users. Here we present BiomiX 3.0, an updated version of the BiomiX platform that extends its integration capabilities with four additional methods: Similarity Network Fusion (SNF), NEighborhood-based Multi-Omics clustering (NEMO), Data Integration Analysis for Biomarker discovery using Latent variable approaches for Omics studies (DIABLO), and PRAMIGO (Phenotyping netwoRk Application for Multi-omics InteGratiOn), a novel supervised heterogeneous graph transformer (HGT) introduced in this work. Results We benchmarked all five methods, MOFA, DIABLO, SNF, NEMO, and PRAMIGO, on two independent multiomics datasets derived from a Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) cohort comparing IGHV-mutated and unmutated patients, and a pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) cohort versus healthy controls. Supervised methods (DIABLO, PRAMIGO) consistently achieved higher condition-specific discrimination as measured by the Adjusted Rand Index (ARI) and the Adjusted Mutual Information (AMI). In contrast, unsupervised methods (SNF, NEMO) revealed alternative patient stratifications driven by independent sources of biological variance while MOFA performed in a semi-supervised way occupies an intermediate position, capturing latent factors that explain both disease-associated and orthogonal sources of variance. Systematic gene-centric analysis of the top-ranked features prioritized by each method was supported by manual biological annotation of shared and method-specific signals. Across cohorts, we annotated 154 shared features (116 genes, 38 metabolites) and 60 method-unique features per cohort, demonstrating that no single integration strategy captures the full landscape of biologically relevant signals. In the CLL cohort, shared features spanned B-cell receptor biology, innate immune signaling, RAS/MAPK activation, and epigenetic regulation, while methodunique features revealed supervised-method-specific insights into vesicle trafficking (DIABLO), immune checkpoints (MOFA), and ncRNA regulation (PRAMIGO). In the PTB cohort, a convergent interferon/innate immune signature dominated shared features across all methods. Still, method-unique analysis uncovered DIABLO-specific acylcarnitine metabolic reprogramming, MOFA-specific restoration of lysosomal trafficking, and PRAMIGO-specific {gamma}{delta} T-cell and immunoglobulin repertoire diversity. Across both cohorts, SNF and NEMO proved useful for detecting biological and technical sources of variation that were orthogonal to the primary condition of interest. Ultimately, PRAMIGO uniquely enables the construction of heterogeneous graphs modeling cross-modal molecular interactions, uncovering epigenetic co-regulation programs in CLL and multi-omics inflammatory modules in PTB that are difficult to identify using conventional integration approaches. Conclusions BiomiX 3.0 provides a graphical user interface (GUI) multi-method integration environment that democratizes access to state-of-the-art multi-omics analysis. By combining both unsupervised and supervised integration strategies within a unified platform and introducing graph-based learning through PRAMIGO, BiomiX 3.0 enables researchers across disciplines with complementary tools to interrogate the biological sources of variation in their data, without requiring bioinformatics expertise.

bioinformatics↗