bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2025.03.14.643205

Inflammatory bowel disease risk gene C1ORF106 regulates actin dynamics in intestinal epithelial cells

Abstract

Background and aimsC1ORF106 has previously been associated with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) via large-scale genetic studies. Increased intestinal permeability is a hallmark of IBD and is observed in at-risk individuals prior to the appearance of clinical symptoms. C1ORF106 was previously shown to regulate intestinal barrier permeability through the regulation of adherens junction stability and through the formation of tight junctions, which impacted actin assembly. However, the downstream impact and molecular mechanisms involved in actin regulation by C1ORF106 havent been explored. Our study aimed at identifying which pathways involved in intestinal epithelial barrier regulation and F-actin regulation are impacted by C1ORF106 and its IBD-associated variant. MethodsWe knocked down (KD) the expression of C1ORF106 in human colonic epithelial cells and characterized the function of the 333F variant in intestinal epithelial spheroid cultures obtained from patient-derived human induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC). We measured barrier permeability and characterized spheroid formation, actin regulation and cell migration though immunofluorescence, western blots and permeability assays. ResultsC1ORF106 KD leads to impaired cortical actin belt dynamics and regulation of stress fiber formation, resulting in increased cell constriction, impaired barrier permeability, cell polarity and cell migration. Moreover, we demonstrated that an inhibition of ROCK rescues the actin belt and cell polarity phenotypes in C1ORF106 KD cells, demonstrating that C1ORF106 regulates these phenotypes through a ROCK-dependent mechanism. We also observed an altered nmMYO2-P localization in C1ORF106 KD cells associated with the formation of Vacuolar Apical Compartments (VACs), which are important for 3D epithelial spheroid formation. We observed a similar impact on cell polarity in intestinal epithelial spheroids obtained from hiPSC carrying the 333F variant, providing additional support that this pathway is involved in disease development. ConclusionWe provide insights into the molecular mechanisms by which C1ORF106 controls actin dynamics to regulate intestinal epithelial integrity. summaryC1ORF106 and its inflammatory bowel disease-associated genetic variant regulate intestinal barrier permeability through the regulation of tight junction formation and cell polarity in epithelial cells. This regulation is associated with altered F-actin dynamics that are ROCK-dependent.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Hebert-Milette, I., Levesque, C., Paquette, J., Rivard, M.-E., Villeneuve, L., Boucher, G., Goyette, P., Charron, G., Rioux, J. D.. 2025-03-15. Inflammatory bowel disease risk gene C1ORF106 regulates actin dynamics in intestinal epithelial cells. https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.03.14.643205

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

A genetic screen to identify host factors required for commensal bacterial adherence to the gut epithelia

Bacterial adherence to gut epithelial cells likely involves host genetic components. We isolated a gut commensal bacterium, Lelliottia jeotgali, that can robustly colonize C. elegans through attachment to intestinal epithelial cells. Here, we developed a novel screen in C. elegans to identify host genes required for microbiome bacterial colonization. Using transgenic L. jeotgali strain expressing tdTomato, we conducted forward genetic screens in C. elegans to select for mutants that completely lost colonization. We identified multiple allelic mutations in five different C. elegans genes, termed knockout of Lelliottia adherence (kola) mutants, with a near complete loss of adherence. Each of kola-1-5 is uncharacterized and predicted to encode for a secreted or membrane-bound protein. We also identified gly-5, a GalNAc transferase that initiates O-linked glycosylation. Overall, we describe the first C. elegans screen to identify host factors that control microbiome bacterial colonization in the gut.

genetics↗

Deciphering the Dynamics of Leukemogenic Transformation from Clonal Hematopoiesis in Congenital Neutropenia

Inherited neutropenia syndromes, severe congenital neutropenia (CN) and Shwachman-Diamond syndrome (SDS), confer a high cumulative risk of MDS and AML. It is not yet clear which somatic mutations, in which combination, allele frequency and sequence identify patients at high risk. We analyzed clonal hematopoiesis (CH) in the largest representative cohort of inherited neutropenia patients to date - 658 samples from 309 patients - using error-corrected panel sequencing with longitudinal sampling. This was complemented in selected cases by single-cell DNA sequencing and genotyping of single-cell derived colonies. CH was detected in early childhood, affecting 37.7% of CN and 60% of SDS patients. The somatic mutation burden remained essentially unchanged over decades. In CN, CSF3R mutations were dominant across genetic subtypes, while additional mutations were rare and included ASXL1, TET2, and DNMT3A. ASXL1 mutations most frequently co-occurred with CSF3R mutations. Co-occurring CSF3R and TP53 mutations were only found in SRP54-CN and CLPB-CN patients. In SDS, TP53 was the most frequently mutated gene, followed by low-prevalence somatic mutations in DNMT3A, IDH1, PTPN11, and RUNX1. In CN-MDS/AML, RUNX1 and SETBP1 mutations emerged shortly before progression to MDS/AML, and membrane-proximal CSF3R mutations only at the leukemic stage. In SDS, biallelic TP53-mutant clones expanded prior to transformation, and a variant allele frequency (VAF) of dominant TP53 clone above 0.074 discriminated between patients who progressed and those who did not. Peripheral blood reflected bone marrow genotype for most key drivers. Leukemic transformation in inherited neutropenia is therefore not stochastic, but rather follows a defined mutational sequence, initiated in childhood.

genetics↗

A largely shared genetic architecture underlies Saccharomyces cerevisiae persistence across different mouse host genotypes

The extent to which interactions between microbial and host genotypes shape opportunistic pathogen persistence within hosts is an important open question. To assess the contribution of these interactions to persistence, we used Saccharomyces cerevisiae , a genetically tractable model for studying opportunistic fungal persistence in mammalian hosts. A pooled panel of barcoded haploid segregants from a cross between a laboratory strain and a clinical isolate, together with both parents, was introduced intravenously into seven genetically diverse mouse strains. We measured the relative persistence of segregants in mouse brains and livers using barcode sequencing. Persistence showed transgressive segregation in both organs. On average across the two organs, yeast genotype explained 45.2% of the variance in segregant persistence, whereas yeast genotype-by-host genotype interactions explained only 2.9%. Linkage mapping showed that loci detected in more host genotypes generally explained more phenotypic variance than those detected in fewer host genotypes. At some loci, genetic variation correlated with increased yeast persistence across multiple organs (general loci) while at others increased persistence in one organ came at the cost of decreased persistence in another (antagonistic loci). General loci contributed disproportionately to brain persistence, whereas liver persistence reflected contributions from both classes. The clinical parent showed greater persistence than the laboratory parent in every host-organ combination, and the additive effects of detected loci predicted the direction of this advantage. Overall, this work shows that in this system, relative microbial persistence is polygenic, with a strong additive component and only a very small contribution from microbial genotype-by-host genotype interactions.

genetics↗