geneRNIB: a living benchmark for gene regulatory network inference

Abstract

Gene regulatory networks (GRNs) underpin cellular identity and function, playing a key role in health and disease. GRN inference has received substantial attention, motivating systematic benchmarking. Despite various benchmarking efforts, existing studies remain limited in the number of methods, datasets, and metrics, fail to capture the context-specific nature of regulatory interactions across biological conditions, and are constrained by the absence of a reliable ground truth. Here, we introduce geneRNIB, a comprehensive GRN inference benchmarking framework built on three key principles: continuous integration, context-specific evaluation, and holistic assessment in the absence of a true reference network. geneRNIB enables the seamless incorporation of new algorithms, datasets, and evaluation metrics to reflect ongoing developments. In the current version, we systematically integrated and assessed 12 GRN inference methods, spanning single- and multiomics approaches across 11 datasets including thousands of perturbation scenarios. We introduced complementary metrics specifically designed to assess context-specific inference. Our findings indicate that simple models with fewer assumptions often outperform more complex pipelines across several perturbation-informed and predictive metrics. Notably, gene expression-based algorithms yielded better results than more advanced multimodal approaches. In addition, we identify several potential factors that influence the performance of GRN inference and offer actionable guidelines for the future development of the method. By addressing these critical limitations in existing benchmarks, geneRNIB advances GRN inference research and fosters progress toward personalized medicine.