bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2025.02.21.639391

Circular RNA Circ-Cdr1as modulates Macrophage phenotype and Cardiac Reparative Function by Circ-Cdr1as-miR-7-Klf4 pathway

Abstract

BackgroundMechanisms of macrophage switching from pro-inflammatory to anti-inflammatory phenotypes are not well understood. Circular RNAs (circRNAs), a new class of non-coding RNAs, are implicated in immune modulation. We recently identified circ-cdr1as as a regulator of macrophage phenotype in bone marrow derived macrophages (BMDM), however, their role in immunomodulation during cardiovascular injury remains unknown. MethodsCell-specific expression levels of circ-cdr1as was determined in a mouse hearts post-myocardial infarction (MI). Circ-cdr1as was overexpressed in fluorescently labeled BMDMs and injected into the ischemic myocardium immediately following MI. Effect of AAV9-mediated systemic delivery of circ-Cdr1as on post-MI cardiac function and structure was determined. Downstream mechanisms were studied using gain and loss of function strategies. ResultsCardiac cell specific expression analysis showed significant downregulation of circ-cdr1as only in macrophages and cardiomyocytes. Overexpression of circ-cdr1as in BMDMs, injected into the ischemic myocardium retained their anti-inflammatory phenotype and significantly improved left ventricular (LV) functions and reduced infarct size. Systemic delivery of AAV9-circ-cdr1as showed similar cardiac reparative activity. Mechanistically, circ-cdr1as directly binds and sponge microRNA-7 and increases the expression of target KLF4. Loss and gain of function studies show that modulation of miR-7 and KLF recapitulates macrophage phenotypic changes. ConclusionsCirc-cdr1as plays a crucial role in regulating the anti-inflammatory phenotype of macrophages through modulation of miR-7 and its target gene KLF4. Therefore, circ-cdr1as holds potential as an anti-inflammatory regulator in tissue inflammation post-cardiac injury. Novelty and SignificanceO_ST_ABSWhat is Known?C_ST_ABSO_LIDespite continued research in elucidating mechanisms involved in cardiovascular disease and benefits of approved guideline-based therapies, the leading cause of deaths worldwide continues to be cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) with an increasing incidence of heart failure. C_LIO_LIAdvances in high-throughput RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) allowed the identification of novel transcripts such as microRNAs (miRNA), long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), and circular RNAs (circRNA). circular RNAs have recently emerged as promising candidates for targeted therapy due to their circular structure that confers resistance to exonucleases, their capability to regulate gene expression by modulating miRNA activity, sequester proteins by acting as protein sponges, C_LIO_LISeveral studies identified circRNAs to be differentially expressed following myocardial infarction (MI) and to play a role in immunity by contributing to the process of macrophage polarization, appropriate activation of macrophages when exposed to LPS, and inhibition of macrophage biogenesis. However, there are currently no published studies into the role of circular RNAs in the regulation of macrophage plasticity during cardiac injury. C_LI What New information Does This Article Contribute?O_LIWe provide evidence that circ-cdr1as expression is downregulated in the heart 3 days post MI and specifically in cardiomyocytes and macrophages. C_LIO_LIOur study provides promising evidence that overexpression of circ-cdr1as may be cardioprotective by reducing cardiomyocyte apoptosis, enhancing angiogenesis, limiting infarct size, increasing percentage of anti-inflammatory macrophages, and overall preserving post-MI cardiac function. C_LIO_LIMechanistically, we identified a reciprocal relationship between circ-cdr1as and miR-7 at 3 days post-MI and in naive, pro-, and anti-inflammatory macrophages indicating circ-cdr1as role as a miRNA sponge. This suggests that circ-cdr1as/miR-7/Klf4 play a crucial role in cardiac injury and macrophage phenotype. C_LI

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Kishore, R., Gonzalez, C., Cimini, M., Mallaredy, V., Benedict, C. L., Joladarashi, D., Gurrala, C. T., Cheng, Z., Trungcao, M., Rai, A. K., Garikipati, V. N. S.. 2025-02-23. Circular RNA Circ-Cdr1as modulates Macrophage phenotype and Cardiac Reparative Function by Circ-Cdr1as-miR-7-Klf4 pathway. https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.02.21.639391

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Differential requirement for the Ire1 luminal domain in Candida albicans drug susceptibility and pathogenicity

The opportunistic human pathogen Candida albicans depends on the unfolded protein response (UPR) for cell wall integrity, antifungal tolerance, filamentous growth, and virulence. The UPR is driven by the conserved transmembrane sensor Ire1, which is activated either by misfolded proteins through its luminal domain or by lipid bilayer stress (LBS) through its transmembrane domain. In budding yeast, these two activation modes deploy divergent transcriptional programs. Whether the requirement for these two input domains is separable in C. albicans, where the cell membrane and cell wall are themselves the targets of major antifungal drug classes, remains unknown. Here, we engineered a C. albicans strain expressing Ire1 lacking an intact luminal domain (ire1{Delta}LD), which no longer detects proteotoxic stress. The ire1{Delta}LD strain grew in the presence of the azole antifungals fluconazole and miconazole but was highly sensitive to heat shock, cell wall stress, and the echinocandin caspofungin. It was also unable to sustain filamentous growth and showed reduced virulence in a Caenorhabditis elegans infection model. RNA sequencing revealed only modest changes to the steady-state transcriptome of ire1{Delta}LD cells. Together, these findings define a differential requirement for the input domains of C. albicans Ire1, uncoupling growth under azole-induced membrane stress from the cell wall, thermal, and virulence-associated outputs that depend on proteotoxic sensing, a distinction that could inform antifungal strategies targeting the UPR.

cell biology↗

Nucleosome Core Allostery Governs Chromatin Recognition and Cell Fate

Nucleosomes regulate chromatin folding, accessibility, and factor recruitment. Current models primarily attribute these functions to histone tail modifications, while the core is largely viewed as a structural scaffold. Yet subtle changes within the nucleosome core can produce profound functional consequences, and the mechanisms underlying these effects remain unclear. Here, we describe nucleosome core allostery as a fundamental principle of chromatin regulation that amplifies the impact of minimal nucleosome variations. Leveraging natural differences between H2A.Z variants, we show that the nucleosome core encodes distinct conformational dynamics that propagate allosterically, thereby controlling nucleosome accessibility and recognition by chromatin factors. As a result, a single buried amino acid substitution alone is sufficient to reprogram nucleosome dynamics and bias cell identity. Our findings establish the nucleosome core as an allosteric regulatory module and provide a generalizable framework for how subtle variation within nucleosomes is amplified into diverse biological outcomes in development and disease.

cell biology↗

YAP/TAZ-controlled ERK dynamics coordinate progenitor expansion and differentiation commitment

Progenitor cells must proliferate to expand the cell population, yet terminal differentiation requires this proliferative state to end. How signaling controls the duration of this proliferative window remains poorly understood. Using adipogenesis and live single-cell imaging of differentiation, cell-cycle, and ERK-activity reporters, we show that YAP and TAZ coordinate progenitor expansion with differentiation commitment by regulating ERK dynamics. YAP/TAZ maintain cells in a fluctuating high-ERK state that promotes proliferation while actively keeping the differentiation driver PPARG below the threshold for irreversible commitment. Crucially, this differentiation block is not explained by proliferation alone: inhibiting CDK4/6 or AKT suppressed proliferation without restoring differentiation, whereas MEK-ERK inhibition restored differentiation even when YAP/TAZ activity remained high. As YAP/TAZ activity decreases, dampened ERK fluctuations trigger PPARG activation. These findings support a self-limiting model in which YAP/TAZ-driven progenitor expansion progressively increases cell density and contact-dependent Hippo signaling, reducing YAP/TAZ activity and terminating the proliferative phase. Consequently, transient YAP/TAZ activation expands the progenitor pool while preserving subsequent differentiation, whereas sustained activation suppresses commitment. Together, these findings identify YAP/TAZ-controlled ERK dynamics as the nexus coordinating progenitor expansion with terminal differentiation and suggest that slower density-dependent Hippo feedback may set the duration of this proliferative window to regulate differentiated cell-number output.

cell biology↗