bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2025.02.14.638318

DNA damage checkpoints balance a tradeoff between diploid- and polyploid-derived arrest failures

Abstract

The DNA damage checkpoint system ensures genomic integrity by preventing the division of damaged cells. This system operates primarily through the G1/S and G2/M checkpoints, which are susceptible to failure; how these checkpoints coordinate quantitatively to ensure optimal cellular outcomes remains unclear. In this study, we exposed non-cancerous human cells to exogenous DNA damage and used single-cell imaging to monitor spontaneous arrest failure. We discovered that cells fail to arrest in two major paths, resulting in two types with distinct characteristics, including ploidy, nuclear morphology, and micronuclei composition. Computational simulations and experiments revealed strengthening one checkpoint reduced one mode of arrest failure but increased the other, leading to a critical tradeoff for optimizing total arrest failure rates. Our findings suggest optimal checkpoint strengths for minimizing total error are inherently suboptimal for any single failure type, elucidating the systemic cause of genomic instability and tetraploid-like cells in response to DNA damage HighlightsO_LIArrest-failed cells result from two routes, each leading to a distinct type C_LIO_LIThese types differ in nuclear morphology, size, ploidy and micronuclei composition C_LIO_LIStrengthening one checkpoint reduces one arrest-failure type but increases the other C_LIO_LITotal error is minimized when checkpoint strengths are suboptimal for each type C_LI eTOCSingle-cell quantitative analyses and computational simulations reveal that the DNA damage checkpoint system balances a tradeoff between reducing arrest failure from diploid cells and from damage-induced polyploid cells. The study suggests that to minimize total arrest failure, the checkpoint strengths need to be sub-optimal for each individual arrest-failure type.

Source connections

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Fujimaki, K., Jambhekar, A., Lahav, G.. 2025-02-16. DNA damage checkpoints balance a tradeoff between diploid- and polyploid-derived arrest failures. https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.02.14.638318

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Functional characterization of Rho GTPase activating proteins SYDE1 and SYDE2

The human genome encodes more than 60 proteins containing Rho GTPase activating protein (RhoGAP) domains, many of which remain understudied with respect to their target specificity and biological roles. SYDE1 and SYDE2 are two such orphan RhoGAPs, for which there are few studies characterizing their biochemical and cellular functions and conflicting reports identifying their cognate GTPases. We previously identified SYDE1 and SYDE2 in a screen for substrates of the c-Jun N-terminal kinases. Here, we show that SYDE1 and SYDE2 are preferentially phosphorylated by JNK1 relative to other mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) at sites proximal to a kinase docking region. Purified SYDE1 and SYDE2 are shown to have significant catalytic GAP activity toward RhoA, Rac1, and Cdc42. However, neither up- nor down-regulation of SYDE1/2 expression leads to detectable changes in bulk GTP loading of any of these GTPases. Nevertheless, we demonstrate that SYDE1 and SYDE2, in a partially GAP-dependent manner, increase cell spreading and number of focal adhesions, and promote more directionally persistent migration in HEK293 cells. Together, these findings establish SYDE1 and SYDE2 as robust JNK substrates with catalytic activity toward a set of Rho GTPases and reveal basic functions of SYDE1 and SYDE2 in regulating cell morphology, adhesion, and migration.

cell biology↗

The filopodial scaffold polyphosphate dictates cell adhesion-versus-invasion decisions

Inorganic polyphosphate (polyP) is an ancient polymer conserved across all life, serving cell type and location specific functions in every major compartment. Yet its role at the plasma membrane, where it accumulates to peak levels in many primary cells, is largely unknown. Here we identify polyP as a stabilizing component of filopodia, actin based membrane protrusions that govern cell adhesion, contact inhibition, and chemotaxis. Elevating cellular polyP increases filopodial stability and enhances cell adhesion, whereas reducing polyP accelerates filopodial disassembly and promotes cell migration. Mechanistically, we find that polyP acts as a structural filopodial scaffold, recruiting and organizing IRSp53, a membrane curvature inducing protein. We show that metastatic fibroblasts and breast cancer organoids carry markedly reduced and intracellularly reorganized polyP levels relative to their non transformed counterparts. Restoring endogenous polyP via lipid nanoparticle delivery suppresses their invasive phenotypes and reverses prometastatic gene expression signatures, implicating polyP as a primordial tumor suppressor.

cell biology↗

Mitochondrial transfer mediates metabolic communication between beta cells and islet macrophages

Pancreatic islet macrophages support islet homeostasis and adapt their metabolic program in response to environmental cues, including beta cell released factors. Intercellular mitochondrial transfer is a biological process that modulates cellular responses. To test whether beta cells, which are strongly secretory, transfer mitochondria to islet macrophages, we generated mice with beta cell-specific expression of mitochondrial GFP (PhAMfloxIns1Cre). We demonstrate that beta cells transfer mitochondria to islet macrophages in vivo and in vitro. Diabetogenic stressors did not alter the frequency of mitochondrial transfer and macrophages containing beta cell-derived GFP exhibit increased protein synthesis rates. RNA-seq identified upregulation of activity-regulated cytoskeleton associated protein (Arc) in macrophages receiving beta cell-derived mitochondria, while disruption of actin cytoskeleton dynamics prevented mitochondrial transfer. Together, these findings identify mitochondrial transfer as a previously unrecognized mechanism of beta cell-macrophage communication that may contribute to islet homeostasis and immune regulation.

cell biology↗