bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2025.02.14.638317

RAS mutation-specific signaling dynamics in response to paralog- and state- selective RAS inhibitors

Abstract

A high therapeutic index (TI), balancing potent oncogenic signaling inhibition in tumor cells with minimal effects on normal cells, is critical for effective cancer therapies. Recent advances have introduced diverse RAS-targeting inhibitors, including mutant-specific inhibitors (e.g., KRAS(G12C) and KRAS(G12D)), as well as paralog- and state-selective inhibitors. Non-mutant-specific RAS inhibition can be accomplished by 1) panRAS-GEF(OFF) inhibitors which inactivate RAS indirectly by inhibiting SHP2 or SOS1, thereby blocking the nucleotide exchange step of RAS activation, 2) direct KRAS(OFF)-selective inhibitors sparing NRAS and HRAS, and 3) panRAS(ON) inhibitors that directly target active RAS, by occluding binding of its effector RAF. However, the signaling inhibition index (SII) - the differential inhibition of oncogenic signaling between RAS-mutant (RAS(MUT)) and normal cells - remains poorly defined for these approaches. In this study, we evaluated the SII of state- and paralog-selective RAS inhibitors across diverse RAS-mutant (RAS(MUT)) and RAS-wild-type (RAS(WT)) models. PanRAS-GEF(OFF) inhibitors exhibited neutral or negative SII, with comparable or reduced MAPK suppression in KRAS(G12X) cells relative to RAS(WT) cells. KRAS(G13D) models showed low sensitivity (negative SII) to panRAS-GEF(OFF) inhibitors, particularly in the context of NF1 loss. Combination treatments with SHP2 and MEK inhibitors resulted in low SII, as pathway suppression was similar in RAS(MUT) and RAS(WT) cells. Furthermore, RAS(Q61X) models were resistant to combined SHP2 inhibitor+MEK inhibitor due to dual mechanisms: MEK inhibitor-induced NRAS(Q61X) reactivation and RAS(MUT)-induced SHP2 conformations impairing inhibitor binding. Overall, panRAS-GEF(OFF) inhibitors exhibited the lowest SII. PanKRAS(OFF) inhibitors demonstrated a higher SII, while panRAS(ON) inhibitors displayed broader activity but relatively narrow SII. We observed that tumors that were sensitive to RAS(MUT)-specific inhibitors, were also sensitive to the state-selective RAS inhibitors (OFF, or ON). In fact, all RAS inhibitors (mutant-specific and state- or paralog-selective) were active in the same portion of RAS(MUT) models, while the majority of RAS(MUT) cell lines were insensitive to all of them. These findings reveal significant SII variability among RAS-targeted inhibitors, depending on the specific RAS driver mutation and cell context and underscore the importance of incorporating SII considerations into the design and clinical application of RAS-targeted therapies to improve therapeutic outcomes. Main pointsO_ST_ABSPanRAS-GEF(OFF) inhibitors have limited SII and effectivenessC_ST_ABSThe Signaling Inhibition Index (SII) - i.e. the differential inhibition of oncogenic signaling between tumor and normal cells - was neutral or negative for panRAS-GEF(OFF) inhibitors, with comparable or reduced MAPK suppression in KRAS(G12X) mutant versus RAS(WT) cells. KRAS(G13D) models showed reduced sensitivity, particularly with NF1 loss. SHP2+MEK inhibitor combinations also had low SII, with RAS(Q61X) models demonstrating resistance due to NRAS(Q61X) reactivation and impaired SHP2 inhibitor binding. PanKRAS(OFF) selective inhibitors have higher SII than panRAS-GEF(OFF) inhibitorspanKRAS(OFF)-selective inhibitors have a higher SII compared to panRAS-GEF(OFF) inhibitors, offering better tumor-versus-normal cell selectivity. PanRAS(ON) inhibitors have broad but modest SIIWhile panRAS(ON) inhibitors displayed a broader activity profile, their ability to selectively inhibit mutant RAS signaling over normal cells remained relatively narrow (low SII). Most KRAS-mutant tumors will be insensitive to any single RAS-targeted inhibitorState- and paralog-selective inhibitors have enhanced activity in the same RAS-MUT cancer models that are also sensitive to RAS-MUT-specific inhibitors, suggesting that most KRAS-MUT tumors will not respond uniformly to any one RAS-targeting inhibitor. SII varies across RAS inhibitors, necessitating tailored therapeutic strategiesThe effectiveness of paralog- and state-selective inhibitors depends on specific RAS mutations and cell context, highlighting the need to integrate SII considerations into the development and clinical application of RAS-targeted therapies.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Baars, B., Orive-Ramos, A., Kou, Z., Gaire, B., Desaunay, M., Adamopoulos, C., Aaronson, S. A., Wang, S., Poulikakos, P. I.. 2025-02-17. RAS mutation-specific signaling dynamics in response to paralog- and state- selective RAS inhibitors. https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.02.14.638317

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Ex vivo human tumor slices more accurately predict patient responses to an oncolytic virus than in vivo mouse models

Immunotherapies, including oncolytic viruses (OV), are promising therapies that can enhance anti-tumor immune responses. However, preclinical success of immunotherapies in mouse models has not always translated to clinical benefit in cancer patients. This study compared preclinical efficacy and mechanism of action for ASP9801, a vaccinia virus expressing IL-7 and IL-12, using mouse models of colorectal cancer (CRC) in vivo and in human organotypic tumor slice models ex vivo. The murine surrogate for ASP9801 significantly reduced tumor volumes in treated and abscopal tumors in two different CRC models in vivo (MC38 and RO100). Treatment efficacy was accentuated when combined with anti-PD1 treatment, and single-cell RNA sequencing analysis revealed depletion of tumor cells and increased T cell infiltration and activation in both treated and abscopal tumors. However, human tissue analysis ex vivo (E-slices) using PDX models and patient samples showed that ASP9801 is not effective in CRC, consistent with clinical trial results. On the other hand, ASP9801 was highly effective in GBM, indicating indication-specific efficacy of ASP9801, and how E-slice assays can be used to identify treatment-sensitive indications. This study demonstrates the superiority of E-slices over mouse models for predicting clinical response and its utility in planning clinical trials.

cancer biology↗

Immune-cell depleted diffuse large B-cell lymphomas have reduced expression of MHC class I

Immunotherapy has transformed treatment for many cancers. In the aggressive and genetically heterogeneous diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), CD19 CAR T-cell therapy is highly effective, whereas immune checkpoint blockade has shown limited benefit. Loss of MHC expression is a common mechanism to escape T-cell cytotoxicity, and loss of MHC class I (MHC-I) and II are frequent in DLBCL. We applied imaging mass cytometry to diagnostic biopsies from younger, high-risk DLBCL patients to map the tumor microenvironment (TME) spatial architecture in relation to tumor cell MHC expression, mutational status, transcriptomic and proteomic profiles. Neighborhood analyses identified four TME subtypes: immune-cell depleted and three immune-infiltrated types (mixed, CD4 T cell-rich, CD8 T-cell/macrophage-rich). Depleted cases had shorter overall survival (p = 0.033) and increased expression of proteins involved in DNA replication and proliferation markers compared to infiltrated cases. Tumor cell MHC-I expression was heterogeneous. Cases with low frequency of MHC-I-pos tumor cells were enriched for the depleted TME type. MHC-I-pos tumor cells were surrounded by CD4 and CD8 T cells and M1 macrophages, whereas MHC-I-neg tumor cells were closer to other MHC-I-neg tumor cells. These findings suggest that TME-based classification incorporating tumor cell MHC-I status may improve individualized immunotherapy selection.

cancer biology↗

Cross-species analysis links cell-cell communication rewiring to NOTCH2 during serous endometrial carcinogenesis

Cell-cell interactions shape the fate of mutant cells during cancer initiation but how these interactions evolve during progression to pathologically recognizable lesions remain poorly understood. Here, we investigated cell-cell communication during serous endometrial carcinoma (SEC; also known as uterine serous carcinoma) development using a lineage-traceable mouse model and cross-species analyses of the mouse and human neoplastic endometrium. In mice, the early, pre-dysplastic stage was marked by a global decrease in inferred cell-cell interactions, followed by extensive communication network rewiring during neoplastic progression. Pathway-specific analysis revealed a similar pattern for NOTCH signaling, with NOTCH2 emerging as the dominant NOTCH receptor in Trp53/Rb1-mutant immature epithelial cells. Functionally, NOTCH2 promoted the outgrowth of more proliferative mutant organoids. Cross-species transcriptomic analysis identified conserved immature epithelial states in mouse and human neoplastic endometrial epithelium. In human tissues, NOTCH2 was overexpressed in serous endometrial intraepithelial carcinoma, a precursor of SEC, and in overt SEC. Furthermore, elevated NOTCH2 expression was associated with poor patient survival. These findings link cell-cell communication rewiring during experimental SEC development to conserved neoplastic epithelial states and identify NOTCH2 as an early marker and a potential target of disease interception.

cancer biology↗