bioRxiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/bioRxiv

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2025.01.31.635761

Reliability of self-reported catch and effort data via smartphone applications in a multi-species recreational fishery

Morro, B.·Riera, I.·Mira, A.·Mecinas, C.·Grau, A. M.·Alos, J.
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The spatial and temporal heterogeneity of recreational anglers and the challenges associated with monitoring their activities often complicate their effective management. Angler smartphone applications (apps) offer a promising digital tool for self-reporting fishing effort (E) and captures per unit of effort (CPUE). However, despite their growing use for data collection in recreational fisheries, the existing literature on their performance remains limited, raising concerns about potential biases in the collected data. Since 2019, self-reporting of E and CPUE has been mandatory for recreational fishing trips within the network of partially-protected Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) in the Balearic Islands (Spain). A regional-scale App ("Diari de Pesca Recreativa") was developed to streamline data collection. This study aimed to evaluate the Apps performance in reporting recreational fisheries data over a six-year period. Data obtained via the App (3,672 trip self-reports) were compared to data collected through a traditional method (360 on-site creel surveys). Estimates of E and CPUE were compared across datasets overall, as well as by month, fishing modality, MPA, and for key target species. Significant differences were observed for E (hours {middle dot} angler {middle dot} trip, p < 0.001) and CPUE (captures{middle dot} E-1, p = 0.001) across datasets. However, when stratified by species, month, fishing modality, and MPA, most groups showed no statistically significant differences in E and CPUE estimates. Data from the App tended to overestimate E compared to creel surveys, likely due to inaccuracies in self-reported trip durations. Conversely, creel surveys appeared to underestimate E, reflecting intrinsic biases in trip duration collection. Assuming that the true values of E and CPUE lie between the estimates derived from the App and creel surveys, integrating both methods is recommended to improve the accuracy and reliability of data. The App not only generates a higher volume of trip data but also provides a user-friendly platform for self-reporting. Moreover, it digitizes data collection, enabling automation and advanced analytics for fisheries monitoring and management of recreational fisheries.

Source connections

Explore related subjects

ecologyPreprint

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Morro, B., Riera, I., Mira, A., Mecinas, C., Grau, A. M., Alos, J.. 2025-02-05. Reliability of self-reported catch and effort data via smartphone applications in a multi-species recreational fishery. https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.01.31.635761

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

bioRxiv2026

Wildfires drive trade-offs in ammonia-oxidizing groups and promote denitrification to increase soil emissions of nitric oxide (NO) and nitrous oxide (N2O) in California chaparral

Wildfires can promote trade-offs in soil nitrifier and denitrifier communities that affect post-fire nitrogen (N) cycling and emissions of nitric oxide (NO), nitrous oxide (N2O), and dinitrogen (N2). For example, by increasing soil pH and ammonium (NH4+), wildfires could increase the abundance of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (AOB) over archaea (AOA). Because AOB and AOA process N differently, nitrifier trade-offs may affect N emissions and nitrate (NO3-) supply with downstream effects on denitrifier activity, leading us to ask: Do trade-offs between AOA and AOB abundance and shifts in denitrifying processes influence N emissions over time after wildfire? We selectively inhibited AOA and AOB communities from soil collected over four seasonal time points one year before and after a chaparral wildfire and used stable isotopes to parse denitrifier contributions to N2O emissions. Over one year after the wildfire, soil pH increased from 6.1 to 7.0, soil extractable NH4+ increased 30-fold, NO3- increased 5-fold, and NO2- increased 9-fold. AOB amoA gene copy numbers increased 20-fold one year after fire, while AOA abundance remained unchanged. Post-fire soil NO emissions increased 63-fold over one year, with varied contributions from all nitrifier groups. Soil N2O emissions peaked eight months after fire (2271 {+/-} 634 ng N2O-N g-1 soil), with increased contributions from AOA. Wildfire increased {delta}15NSPN2O and {delta}15NbulkN2O values, suggesting increased N2O reduction to N2. Overall, wildfire increased AOB abundance relative to AOA, promoting nitrification activity and providing intermediates to denitrifiers to increase emissions of NO and N2O for up to one year after fire.

ecology↗
bioRxiv2026

Global urban forest cover and nature access is insufficient for human wellbeing and worsening

Target 12 of the Global Biodiversity Framework urges governments to enhance human access to nature to improve human wellbeing. Here, we study nature access using several metrics for a globally representative sample of 140 large Functional Urban Areas, examining variation among regions and over time. We find most urbanites globally do not reach common benchmarks for urban forest cover and nature access. Globally, 3.3 billion people (76% of urbanites) live in urban areas that do not have at least 30% tree canopy cover. Moreover, 1.1 billion people (23% of urbanites) are farther than 1 km from a park as identified in Open Street Map, and 1.5 billion people (36% of all urbanites) are more than 1 km from a green patch as defined by land cover. Over time, urban nature access has declined. Between 1992 and 2020, most urban residents had an increase in the distance to green patches (63% of urbanites increased, average increase 680 m). Similarly, between 1992 and 2020, 31% of urbanites had a decrease in percent natural cover, while only 1.3% had an increase. We show that the variation among cities or regions in the amount of nature access depends on the metric used and the context. On average, mesic climates have more tree cover than do arid climates, and cities with lower GDP or higher population density tend to have lower natural share than other cities. Our results suggest that global urban nature access is insufficient for supporting human health and worsening over time.

ecology↗
bioRxiv2026

Exploring soil microbes' potential to assess Atlantic Forest restoration trajectories

Soil microbe communities are key indicators of ecosystem recovery, yet their integration into operational restoration monitoring remains limited. We evaluated the potential for benchmarking early Atlantic Forest restoration with reference site-based comparisons using bacteria and fungi. Samples were collected from three geographic clusters and spanned a pasture-restoration-forest land-use gradient. Using metabarcoding, we assessed whether soil microbe community diversity, structure, and functional profiles respond to restoration progress considering influences from spatial arrangement and/or successional stage (determined using NDVI). We found that OTU alpha diversity was not explained by either predictor, whereas the Shannon diversity of bacterial functions declined significantly with increasing NDVI. Bacterial and fungal OTU composition (Bray-Curtis) responded significantly to both NDVI and geographic cluster, as did microbe functional profiles, although only NDVI proved both marginally and conditionally significant. We also found that soil chemical parameters were primarily structured by geographic cluster but not by NDVI, suggesting that many abiotic edaphic conditions reflect soil history rather than current vegetation status. These findings suggest that both microbe taxonomic and functional metrics track revegetation progress and validate eDNA as a scalable, sensitive restoration monitoring framework. Importantly, our results also support the use of reference site-based monitoring for Atlantic Forest restoration.

ecology↗