bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2025.01.16.633271

Childhood Maltreatment and Brain Aging During Adulthood

Abstract

ImportanceChildhood maltreatment (CM) is associated with the early onset of psychiatric and medical disorders and accelerated biological aging. ObjectiveTo identify types of maltreatment and developmental sensitive periods that are associated with accelerated adult brain aging. DesignParticipants were mothers of infants recruited from the community into a study assessing the effects of CM on maternal behavior, infant attachment, and maternal and infant neurobiology. Data were collected from July 2015 to November 2019 and were analyzed from July 2023 to October 2024. SettingAcademic medical centers. ParticipantsHigh-quality MRI scans were obtained on 92 of 150 mothers enrolled in the study. The main exclusion criteria for neuroimaging were histories of head trauma with loss of consciousness or concussion, psychotropic use before age 18, pregnancy, and customary MRI exclusions (e.g., metal implant). The primary reasons for non-completion of the neuroimaging study were unwillingness to be scanned, inability to attend the MRI study visit due to work and/or childcare, metal implants, or pregnancy. Main Outcome(s) and Measure(s)The Maltreatment and Abuse Chronology of Exposure scale was used to retrospectively assess the annual severity of exposure to ten types of CM from birth to age 18 years. Brain age was calculated from T1-weighted 3T MRI Scans using a previously published machine learning algorithm. Sensitive periods were identified using random forest regression with conditional inference trees. ResultsForty-nine (53.3%) of the 92 mothers (mean [SD] age, 32.4 [4.3] years) reported experiencing one or more types of CM. Total CM severity was associated with accelerated brain aging ({beta}=0.05, 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.09, p<.005). The most robust type/time risk factors for accelerated brain aging were parental physical abuse between ages 4 to 6 years, witnessing sibling violence between ages 4 to 15 years, parental verbal abuse between ages 10 to 12 years, and parental emotional neglect between ages 16 to 18 years. Conclusions and RelevanceSeveral types of CM between ages 4-18 years were associated with accelerated brain aging. Understanding how these specific types and ages of exposure contribute to accelerated brain aging may provide important insights into preventing key clinical consequences of CM. SUMMARYQuestion: How does childhood adversity relate to brain aging in adulthood, and are there sensitive periods for this association? Findings: In this cohort-based study of adult women, we observed sensitive periods for the association between adult brain aging and five classes of childhood maltreatment: parental physical abuse, parental verbal abuse, parental emotional neglect, and witnessing sibling violence. Meaning: These findings suggest that maltreatment subtype and age at exposure may be important factors contributing to the impact of childhood adversity on brain aging later in life.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Fleming, L., Ohashi, K., Enlow, M. B., Khoury, J., Klengel, T., Lyons-Ruth, K., Teicher, M., Ressler, K. J.. 2025-01-17. Childhood Maltreatment and Brain Aging During Adulthood. https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.01.16.633271

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Cell Types in Describing Neuronal Physiological Features

Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) captures detailed gene expression profiles at scale, while patch-clamp recordings measure intrinsic neuronal electrophysiological properties. Modeling the relations between these two modalities remains a challenge. Here, we compare how well electrophysiological features can be predicted by traditional transcriptomic cell type classification, representations derived from a foundational model (scGPT) pretrained on large-scale scRNA-seq datasets, ion channel-coding genes, and highly variable genes. Using paired transcriptomic and electrophysiological patch-sequencing data from 495 human neurons from neurosurgical tissue, we find that cluster-level cell type representations consistently outperform highly variable gene selection, ion channel gene selection, and context-enriched scGPT embeddings. Notably, performance varies across model architectures and initializations, and the best results are obtained by combining the outputs of separate cell type and scGPT-based models. Together, these findings suggest that traditional discrete cellular classification is highly effective in predicting physiological features. For maximum performance it can be complemented by pretrained transformer models.

neuroscience↗

A nonlinear inhibition pathway underlying cortical responses to tuned holographic optogenetic perturbations

Optogenetics enables causal manipulation of cortical activity. Perturbation responses can be counterintuitive due to network interactions, making theory essential for predicting them. Existing approaches often rely on linear approximations, which fail for many biologically relevant perturbations. Here we develop a nonlinear theory of responses to holographic perturbations in cell-type-specific recurrent networks with structured connectivity. We fit a nonlinear model to mouse V1 data, which shows cotuned-ensemble suppression: perturbing spatially clustered neurons with similar preferred orientations yields markedly stronger short-range suppression than perturbing untuned ensembles. We show that cotuned-ensemble suppression arises from a feature-tuned, nonlinear inhibition pathway implicating somatostatin-positive (SST) interneurons. The theory predicts that cotuned ensembles suppress parvalbumin-positive (PV) neurons but facilitate SST neurons, and links the degree of cotuned-ensemble suppression or facilitation to the variance of the SST response. This framework identifies mechanisms by which nonlinear inhibition sculpts cortical dynamics and establishes a predictive basis for targeted optogenetic interventions.

neuroscience↗

Proteomic signatures of APOE ε4 across human tissues and cell types in Alzheimers disease

The apolipoprotein E {varepsilon}4 (APOE {varepsilon}4) allele is the strongest genetic risk factor for late-onset Alzheimers disease (AD). However, the underlying molecular mechanisms remain unclear. This study included 1691 participants from the Religious Orders Study and Rush Memory and Aging Project (ROSMAP), 1226 participants from the Accelerating Medicines Partnership - Alzheimers Disease (AMP-AD) Diverse Cohorts Study, and 735 participants from the Alzheimers Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI). To characterise APOE {varepsilon}4 molecular effects, we analysed proteomic data from plasma, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived astrocytes and neurons, as well as transcriptomic and proteomic data from multiple brain regions. The association of APOE {varepsilon}4 with AD neuropathology was also examined. APOE {varepsilon}4 carriers shared a plasma proteomic signature enriched for immune processes, irrespective of AD diagnosis. A machine learning classifier trained on this signature discriminated APOE {varepsilon}4 carriers from non-carriers in an independent cohort using CSF proteomics. APOE {varepsilon}4 carriage was associated with higher Braak stages and Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimers Disease (CERAD) score. However, only limited APOE {varepsilon}4-associated transcriptomic and proteomic changes were observed in bulk brain tissue, with poor cross-layer concordance. Proteomic analyses of iPSC-derived astrocytes and neurons further revealed cell-type-specific APOE {varepsilon}4-associated changes. APOE {varepsilon}4 is associated with a consistent proteomic signature across plasma and CSF. Its molecular effects in the brain differ across cell types, brain regions and molecular layers. These findings support the need for cell-type-resolved multi-omic studies to elucidate how APOE {varepsilon}4 confers AD risk.

neuroscience↗