Perceived risk of forward versus backward balance disturbances while walking in young and older adults

Abstract

Falls, which often result from trips or slips, pose a major health concern, particularly among older adults. Experiencing falls or near-falls from balance disturbances can shape subsequent gait-related decisions, as individuals may avoid situations they perceive as risky. Here, we explore whether perceptions of risk are sensitive to the direction of previously experienced balance disturbances - forward or backward - and whether these perceptions change with age. Twenty young and twenty older adults walked on a split-belt treadmill while performing a two-alternative forced-choice task, where they indicated their preference between a forward-falling trip and a backward-falling slip. We varied the perturbation magnitudes using an adaptive staircase algorithm to obtain multiple trip-slip equivalence points. Using a mixed- effects linear model, we estimated the slope of the trip-slip relationship, which quantified the direction and strength of the sensitivity of perceived risk to perturbation type. To assess reliability, we repeated the procedure on a second day. Additionally, we investigated two potential reasons underlying any observed sensitivity - 1) emotional responses measured by state anxiety, and 2) physical responses measured by peak center of mass velocity. We found that both young and older adults perceived slips to be riskier than trips, with no group difference in sensitivity. The relative sensitivity to slips versus trips was moderately reliable across two days of testing, though most participants were less sensitive to perturbation direction on the second day. Neither state anxiety responses nor peak center of mass (CoM) velocity explained the directional sensitivity, though CoM velocity was higher during slips than trips for both age groups. These results suggest that the characteristics of experienced balance disturbances may influence behavioral decisions. Objectively measuring individual differences in the perceived risk of balance disturbances and the ability to recover from these disturbances, can potentially improve fall risk assessment and inform personalized training interventions.