bioRxiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/bioRxiv

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2025.01.08.631868

Differential effects of dopamine and serotonin on reward and punishment processes in humans: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Mkrtchian, A.·Qiu, Z.·Abir, Y.·Erdmann, T.·Dercon, Q.·Sedlinska, T.·Browning, M.·Costello, H.·Huys, Q. J. M.
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

ImportanceTo support treatment assignment, mechanistic biomarkers should be selectively sensitive to specific interventions. Here, we examine whether different components of reinforcement learning in humans satisfy this necessary precondition. We focus on pharmacological manipulations of dopamine and serotonin that form the backbone of first-line management of common mental illnesses such as depression and anxiety. ObjectiveTo perform a meta-analysis of pharmacological manipulations of dopamine and serotonin and examine whether they show distinct associations with reinforcement learning components in humans. Data SourcesOvid MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, and PsycInfo databases were searched for studies published between January 1, 1946 and January 19, 2023 (repeated April 9, 2024, and October 15, 2024) investigating dopaminergic or serotonergic effects on reward/punishment processes in humans, according to PRISMA guidelines. Study SelectionStudies reporting randomized, placebo-controlled, dopaminergic or serotonergic manipulations on a behavioral outcome from a reward/punishment processing task in healthy humans were included. Data Extraction and SynthesisStandardized mean difference (SMD) scores were calculated for the comparison between each drug (dopamine/serotonin) and placebo on a behavioral reward or punishment outcome and quantified in random-effects models for overall reward/punishment processes and four main subcategories. Study quality (Cochrane Collaborations tool), moderators, heterogeneity, and publication bias were also assessed. Main Outcome(s) and Measure(s)Performance on reward/punishment processing tasks. ResultsIn total, 68 dopamine and 39 serotonin studies in healthy volunteers were included (Ndopamine=2291, Nplacebo=2284; Nserotonin=1491, Nplacebo=1523). Dopamine was associated with an increase in overall reward (SMD=0.18, 95%CI [0.09 0.28]) but not punishment function (SMD=-0.06, 95%CI [-0.26,0.13]). Serotonin was not meaningfully associated with overall punishment (SMD=0.22, 95%CI [-0.04,0.49]) or reward (SMD=0.02, 95%CI [-0.33,0.36]). Importantly, dopaminergic and serotonergic manipulations had distinct associations with subcomponents. Dopamine was associated with reward learning/sensitivity (SMD=0.26, 95%CI [0.11,0.40]), reward discounting (SMD=-0.08, 95%CI [-0.14,-0.01]) and reward vigor (SMD=0.32, 95%CI [0.11,0.54]). By contrast, serotonin was associated with punishment learning/sensitivity (SMD=0.32, 95%CI [0.05,0.59]), reward discounting (SMD=-0.35, 95%CI [-0.67,-0.02]), and aversive Pavlovian processes (within-subject studies only; SMD=0.36, 95%CI [0.20,0.53]). Conclusions and RelevancePharmacological manipulations of both dopamine and serotonin have measurable associations with reinforcement learning in humans. The selective associations with different components suggests that reinforcement learning tasks could form the basis of selective, mechanistically interpretable biomarkers to support treatment assignment. Key pointsO_ST_ABSQuestionC_ST_ABSDo pharmacological manipulations of dopamine and serotonin affect components of reinforcement learning in humans? FindingsUpregulating dopamine is associated with increased reward learning/sensitivity and reward response vigor, and decreased reward discounting. Upregulation of serotonin is associated with increased punishment learning/sensitivity and decreased reward discounting. MeaningPharmacological manipulations of dopamine and serotonin have dissociable associations with different components of reinforcement learning. This forms a necessary basis for the development of selective markers for treatment assignment.

Explore related subjects

neurosciencePreprint

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Mkrtchian, A., Qiu, Z., Abir, Y., Erdmann, T., Dercon, Q., Sedlinska, T., Browning, M., Costello, H., Huys, Q. J. M.. 2025-01-10. Differential effects of dopamine and serotonin on reward and punishment processes in humans: A systematic review and meta-analysis. https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.01.08.631868

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

bioRxiv2026

Same Movements, Different Skills: How Context Shapes Learning in Humans and Neural Networks

What determines whether experiences are integrated into shared representations or split? Motor skill learning offers a revealing test: when two tasks require an identical sequence of movements, both intuition and theory suggest that practice in one should generalize to the other. Yet we find that changing context can make identical movements different skills. In simple recurrent networks trained on the same sequence across contexts, splitting was greatest when strong contextual inputs coincided with a high initial weight scale; neither alone sufficed. Greater representational separation coincided with separate context-specific learning curves. Humans practicing the same finger sequence while alternating between two performance-irrelevant contexts likewise exhibited context-specific curves, rather than the single continuous trajectory observed when practicing in a single context. State-space modeling favored split learning states in humans and very weakly coupled states in the most context-dependent networks. These findings have broader implications for understanding how learning generalizes across contexts.

neuroscience↗
bioRxiv2026

Postpartum resource scarcity reshapes maternal care, offspring prioritization, and the steroid-sensitive medial preoptic area

Parental care requires balancing offspring needs with environmental constraints, yet how resource scarcity alters the organization of maternal responses remains poorly understood. Here, we examined maternal behavior, offspring prioritization, and steroid receptor-associated extracellular matrix organization in postpartum rats exposed to limited bedding and nesting (LBN) or control conditions with ample nesting materials. LBN increased pup-directed and reduced self-directed behaviors but also increased behavioral entropy, a measure of behavioral fragmentation, indicating less predictable caregiving sequences. LBN dams preferentially retrieved male pups first, whereas control dams preferentially retrieved females first. LBN also increased the proportion of pup-investigation time directed toward males compared with controls. In offspring on postnatal day 10, corticosterone was elevated in female but not male LBN pups, a pattern that paralleled the maternal male bias. To identify associated neurobiological changes, we assessed steroid receptors and extracellular matrix organization in the medial preoptic area (mPOA), a key region for maternal behavior. LBN increased numbers of estrogen receptor (ER)- and androgen receptor (AR)-immunoreactive cells, reduced perineuronal net (PNN) abundance, and decreased receptor-positive cell enwrapment. Because PNNs constrain structural plasticity, these findings suggest that the postpartum environment alters the organization of steroid receptor-associated extracellular matrix, potentially modulating experience-dependent plasticity in neurosteroid-sensitive circuits. In sum, LBN increases the levels of maternal engagement while reshaping its temporal organization and allocation, accompanied by selective remodeling of steroid-sensitive preoptic architecture. Therefore, maternal adaptation to adversity may be better understood as changes in caregiving allocation strategies rather than a simple gain or loss of maternal care.

neuroscience↗
bioRxiv2026

The Computational Grammar of Human Behaviour in a Biological Environment

Human behaviour unfolds as an extended stream of spontaneous actions shaped by environmental demands and the agent's goals. The organisation of these actions, situated between setting abstract goals and concrete movement execution, remains poorly characterised. Here, we introduce DynaClade, an unsupervised temporal action segmentation algorithm for human full-body motion capture data, and apply it to freely moving participants navigating ecologically realistic risky foraging environments in virtual reality. DynaClade identifies discrete actions whose kinematic characteristics and spatial distributions correspond to environmental affordances, supporting the validity of the approach. Among these actions, we discovered a hitherto undescribed movement pattern defined by increased body sway without locomotion. Action sequences were highly non-random and showed clear history dependence beyond first-order Markov structure, most of which was explained by a second-order prediction. This higher-order structure was well captured in a hidden Markov model, in which some of the observed actions were associated with more than one latent state. Each of these latent states corresponded to the same action in a distinct action context. These findings suggest that spontaneous human actions are predominantly selected based on the current action and context, rather than following pre-planned or habitually assembled sequences.

neuroscience↗