bioRxiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/bioRxiv

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2025.01.05.631384

Assessing Knowledge, Uptake and Factors associated with cervical cancer screening among women in selected communities of Wakiso District in Uganda: A population-based study

Bulamba, R. M.·Kyasanku, E.·Nalugoda, F.·Daama, A.·Nkale, J.·Miller, A. P.·Byansi, W.·Namutundu, J.·Kigozi, G.·Nalwoga, G. K.·Balwanaki, C.·Watya, S.·Ekström, A. M.·Mugamba, S.·Ndejjo, R.·Nakigozi, G.
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

BackgroundUganda has the highest prevalence and incidence of cervical cancer in the East African region, with 80% of women diagnosed at advanced stage when survival is minimal. Literature on uptake of cervical cancer screening is limited in Uganda and thus womens knowledge and uptake of cervical cancer screening in the general population remains unknown. This study examined this gap of knowledge among women aged 25-65 years, across rural, urban and semi urban communities in a Ugandan district to inform design of targeted future cervical cancer screening programs in the country. MethodsThis descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted in Wakiso district, Uganda in May 2024 among 783 eligible women. Face-to-face interviews were conducted. Uptake of cervical cancer screening (outcome of interest)) was dichotomously (yes/no) assessed. Knowledge of cervical cancer disease was assessed using the AWACAN validated tool, knowledge of cervical cancer screening was assessed using a set of ten (10) questions adapted from previous studies elsewhere, and all were measured on a Likert scale. Univariate, bivariate, and multivariable Poisson regression models with robust variance were performed using Stata software version 17. ResultsRespondents median age was 31 years (IQR 27-39 years). Majority (89.5%, 701/783) had heard of cervical cancer, and 90.6% (635/701) were aware of screening. Median knowledge score on signs and symptoms, risk factors and cervical cancer screening was 8.0 (IQR= 5-10), 8.0 (IQR= 5-11) and 7.0 (IQR= 4-10) respectively, and 54.3% had high knowledge about cervical cancer screening. Uptake of cervical cancer screening was 33.4%. Living in urban areas (aPR = 1.41, 95% CI: 1.05 - 1.88), being the ages 40-49 years (aPR = 1.76, 95% CI: 1.36 - 2.27), 50 years and above (APR = 2.16, 95% CI: 1.53 - 3.04), smoking (aPR = 1.39, 95% CI: 1.05 - 1.86), partner involvement (aPR = 2.61, 95% CI: 2.12-3.21), high knowledge about cervical cancer screening (aPR = 3.29, 95% CI: 2.35-4.60), and living with HIV (aPR = 1.66, 95% CI: 1.66-2.13) were significantly associated with higher uptake of cervical cancer screening among women in this setting. ConclusionKnowledge of cervical cancer screening was high, but the uptake of cervical cancer screening was lower than the recommended population coverage by WHO and Uganda national guidelines. There is need to improve accessibility to cervical cancer screening, increase nationwide cervical cancer awareness campaigns focusing on high-risk age groups and design targeted, tailored, culturally and socially sensitive interventions for young women aged 25-39 years to improve cervical cancer screening in Uganda.

Source connections

Explore related subjects

scientific communication and educationPreprint

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Bulamba, R. M., Kyasanku, E., Nalugoda, F., Daama, A., Nkale, J., Miller, A. P., Byansi, W., Namutundu, J., Kigozi, G., Nalwoga, G. K., Balwanaki, C., Watya, S., Ekström, A. M., Mugamba, S., Ndejjo, R., Nakigozi, G.. 2025-01-06. Assessing Knowledge, Uptake and Factors associated with cervical cancer screening among women in selected communities of Wakiso District in Uganda: A population-based study. https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.01.05.631384

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

bioRxiv2026

Multi-Lab Testing of Early Preclinical Discoveries Identifies Promising Treatments

A fundamental challenge in drug development is the frequent failure of early laboratory research to translate into clinical benefit. One promising solution is to confirm findings from exploratory single-laboratory studies across multiple laboratories before clinical testing. We investigated this approach following the conduct of preclinical multi-laboratory studies across different fields of medicine. For this, we evaluated effect sizes, experimental rigor, and a set of criteria to identify determinants of confirmation success. When tested under increased rigor, only a fraction of multi-laboratory studies confirmed the initial results. The underlying effect size reduction was associated with outcome-relevant experimental differences between exploratory and confirmatory stages. In summary, multi-laboratory studies proved highly informative and served as an effective filter for promising treatments.

scientific communication and education↗
bioRxiv2026

Technology-enhanced learning in undergraduate neuroscience education: tractography-based virtual dissection in psychology

Background: Neuroanatomy poses a significant challenge for Psychology students due to its spatial and conceptual complexity. Educational approaches that enhance the relevance and visualization of neuroanatomical content may improve students learning experiences. This study implemented a tractography-based activity focused on the virtual dissection of the arcuate fasciculus, a major white matter pathway, in undergraduate Psychology students and examined the relationships between perceived learning and students perceptions of utility, difficulty and handling, and organizational aspects of the activity. Methods: First-year undergraduate Psychology students participated in a two-session tractography-based activity combining instruction on white matter anatomy and diffusion tractography with a hands-on virtual dissection of the arcuate fasciculus using research-grade software routinely employed in neuroscience research. Following the activity, students completed an anonymous questionnaire assessing perceived learning, utility, difficulty and handling, and organizational aspects of the activity. Pearson correlations, multiple regression analyses, and relative importance analyses were performed. Results: Sixty-eight students completed the questionnaire. Students reported generally positive perceptions of the activity across the evaluated dimensions, with perceived learning receiving the highest mean score (M = 3.44, SD = .85). Perceived utility showed the strongest association with perceived learning (r = .64, p < .001). The regression model explained 41% of the variance in perceived learning (R2 = .41, adjusted R2 = .38, p < .001). Perceived utility was the only significant predictor in the model ({beta} = .59, p = .001), accounting for 67.9% of the explained variance. Conclusions: The findings support the feasibility of integrating authentic neuroimaging tools into undergraduate neuroanatomy teaching. Students who perceived the activity as more useful also reported higher perceived learning outcomes, with perceived utility emerging as the strongest predictor of perceived learning. In contrast, perceived difficulty and handling, and organizational aspects did not make significant independent contributions. These results suggest that students perceptions of educational relevance may play an important role in technology-enhanced STEM learning experiences.

scientific communication and education↗
bioRxiv2026

A randomized trial of grant writing coaching groups: Qualitative interviews revealing key elements of intervention efficacy

Background Training in grant proposal writing is an essential component of professional development for academic scientists in the biomedical and behavioral sciences. Despite the expansion of inter- and intra-institutional grant writing coaching groups as an approach to honing these skills, specific features that enhance or limit coaching group effectiveness have not been rigorously studied. Methods Qualitative inerviews were conducted with a subset of early-career investigators (n=204 and coaches (n=36) engaged in a national, U.S. based, group-randomized trial of grant writing coaching groups to test the effects of two variables on submission and funding of national-level proposals: (1) coaching duration (regular/extended dose) and (2) mode of engaging a scientific advisor (someone with content-aligned expertise) in the coaching process. This report focuses on interviews conducted upon completion of the regular coaching dose - 5 months of biweekly, group-based coaching sessions to support active proposal writing. Interviews were designed to identify which coaching group elements were perceived to be the most critical. Transcribed interviews were analyzed using deductive (participants) or open (coaches) coding to identify themes. Results Triangulation of results from participant and coach interviews showed strong concordance that coaches, peers, and scientific advisors all played key roles in supporting intervention efficacy. Sufficient alignment of scientific fields and/or methodologies among group members was important, although breadth of perspectives was also valued. Other critical group features were skilled and well-organized coaches, detailed feedback, peer-to-peer support (technical and psychosocial), and clear expectations for group functioning. Factors attenuating impact included variation in participants' engagement and "readiness to write," within-group mismatches of expertise or grant mechanisms, and limited research support at some participants' home institutions. Conclusion This study identified key elements of successful grant writing coaching groups and potential barriers to their effectiveness, while yielding insights about tailoring this approach for individuals at different stages of proposal development.

scientific communication and education↗