bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2025.01.02.631060

Differential effect of supercoiling on bacterial transcription in topological domains

Abstract

DNA supercoiling (SC), the over- and under-winding of DNA, is generated by transcription as described in the twin-domain model. Conversely, SC also impacts transcription through torsional stress. SC therefore regulates transcription independent of transcription factor binding, the classic protein-based transcription regulatory mechanism, particularly in the context of chromosomal topological domains and the actions of topoisomerases. SC-coupled transcription has inspired several computational models, but a systematic and quantitative assessment of the parameters controlling this complex interplay is missing. There is also a lack of comparison to various experimental results regarding the effects of topological variables such as topoisomerase binding rates and domain size on transcription strength and noise. In this work we developed a quantitative model to describe SC-coupled transcription. We analyzed the effects of topoisomerase activities on the transcription of a single isolated gene with varying promoter strengths and in a topological domain of varying sizes. These simulations revealed qualitatively different roles of the two topoisomerases. Topoisomerase I is specifically required for strongly expressed genes that may be hindered by stalled RNAP, whereas gyrase activity favors the expression of all genes by enhancing transcription initiation and modulating the burstiness of transcription. A new analysis of transcriptomics data in several bacterial species showed that these simulations replicate a global relationship between promoters strength and response to variations in topoisomerase activities. Our work demonstrates how SC contributes to differential gene regulation and transcriptional bursting in mechanistic details and unites computational and experimental work. Author SummaryWe are interested in understanding how bacteria regulate the expression of their genes. One mechanism by which bacteria can do so is through the over- and under-winding of their DNA, termed DNA supercoiling. Because bacteria can use enzymes called topoisomerases to regulate the supercoiling level of their DNA, these enzymes can serve as gene regulators. It is difficult, however, to understand how topoisomerases act as gene regulators through experiments alone. Currently, there is no method of measuring the supercoiling level along a stretch of DNA over an extended period of time in living cells. We therefore developed a computational model of gene transcription coupled to supercoiling dynamics. Unlike some previously existing models, we consider continuous response curves of topoisomerases activities in response to the local supercoiling level and the ability of gyrase to perform several catalytic cycles per binding event. We also perform extensive comparisons between our model and existing gene expression and transcriptomics data, which is essential to ensuring the biological relevance of computational modeling efforts. We replicate and provide detailed explanations for several experimental observations, including the connection between supercoiling and transcriptional bursts and the selective gene expression modulation by topoisomerase inhibition that is based on the promoter strength.

Source connections

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Goldberg, B. I., Yehya, N., Xiao, J., Meyer, S.. 2025-01-02. Differential effect of supercoiling on bacterial transcription in topological domains. https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.01.02.631060

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Design of colipids with controlled lateral distance of head group moieties for targeting strategies in the field of lipid-based nanoparticles

Lipid nanoparticles and liposomes are nanoparticle drug formulations which are firmly established in clinics. In order to expand their application and improve efficacy, surface modifications can be a key strategy, especially for cell specific targeting. Targeting can be achieved by integrating ligand functionalized lipids or lipidoids on the nanoparticle surface. In this case, not solely the targeting ligand itself, but also the structure of the whole targeting lipid/lipidoid can affect the interaction of the targeting ligand with the binding motive on cells. Especially, distal spacer structures between lipid anchor and ligand unit, often composed of polyethylene glycol chains, provide a certain distance of the ligand from the nanoparticle surface. A concept which is currently neglected is the control of the lateral distance between ligand structures on the nanoparticle. Herein we investigated the possibility to design lipidoids with a lateral spacer composed of polyethylene glycol units. We synthesized and characterized different lipidoids which provide a primary amine in the head group for possible ligand coupling. In our model lipidoids the head groups were functionalized with a paramagnetic probe to apply electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) methods for the characterization of the lipidoid interaction with model nanoparticles, in our case liposomes. Continuous wave EPR was used to study the efficiency of the novel lipidoids to integrate into lipid bilayers of model liposomes, which was shown to depend on lipidoid structure and liposome composition. Furthermore, using double electron-electron resonance (DEER), we observed lipidoid conformational changes occurring upon integration into liposomes.

biophysics↗

Binding mechanisms of therapeutic antibodies to human claudin-18.2

Claudin-18.2 (CLDN18.2) is a tight junction component with highly restricted expression in the paracellular space of nonmalignant gastric epithelial cells. It becomes accessible on tumor cell surface during malignant transformation, making CLDN18.2 an attractive target for targeted therapies against gastric cancer. Recently, zolbetuximab has become the first FDA-approved monoclonal antibody that targets CLDN18.2 in advanced gastric cancer, and others like osemitamab have entered phase 3 clinical trials. However, the high-resolution structure of CLDN18.2 is lacking, and how CLDN18.2 is recognized by therapeutic antibodies remains undefined. Here, we report cryo-EM structures of human claudin-18.2 (hCLDN18.2) in complex with the Fab fragments of zolbetuximab and osemitamab, revealing the structure of hCLDN18.2 and its binding mechanism to the therapeutic antibodies. Further analyses reveal that three residues in the first extracellular loop of hCLDN18.2 that are different from human claudin-18.1 (hCLDN18.1) play a critical role in antibody binding. Our data elucidate the structural basis for selective binding of therapeutic antibodies to hCLDN18.2, which should aid rational design of next-generation immunotherapies targeting hCLDN18.2.

biophysics↗

Structural relationships between the SLC12 cotransporter C-terminal domain, universal stress proteins and adenylating enzymes

Several SLC12 cotransporters bind ATP in a cytoplasmic C-terminal domain (CTD). We analysed 16,192 CTD-containing SLC12 sequences and compared 42,845 representative structures to examine the relationship between this nucleotide site, universal stress proteins (USPs) and adenylating enzymes. In phosphorylated NKCC1, D891 and D927 lie near the ATP phosphate chain, while R801 and K889 form a basic phosphate-binding clamp. NKCC1 retains this arrangement, whereas KCC paralogs replace or lose several corresponding groups. In structural comparisons with USP and adenylating-enzyme references, both CTD lobes score between universal stress proteins and EC-annotated domains, and the two lobes form separate lineages that include bacterial transporters. Lobe-specific and nucleotide-frame comparisons place ATP in the corresponding structural region used for -phosphate chemistry by catalytic members of this fold. Published work on UspG provides a precedent for protein-bound AMP in a natural USP. In the examined SLC12 structures and USP models, candidate protein hydroxyls lack an in-line geometry for attack at ATP P. Protein adenylation would require a change in protein or nucleotide geometry, or a different acceptor. These results define a structural basis for testing conditional protein adenylation at SLC12 nucleotide sites. The required evidence is a covalent protein-AMP adduct, identification of its acceptor and measurement of the expected pyrophosphate coproduct, with soluble nucleotide analysis to distinguish accompanying ATP reactions.

biophysics↗