bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2024.12.20.629624

singIST: an integrative method for comparative single-cell trancriptomics between disease models and humans

Abstract

MotivationDisease models serve as fundamental tools in drug discovery and early-stage drug development. However, these models are not a perfect reflection of human disease, and selecting a suitable model can be challenging. Existing computational approaches for molecular validation of pathophysiological resemblance to human conditions at single-cell resolution remain limited. Although quantitative computational methods exist to inform this selection, they are very limited at the single-cell resolution, which can be critical for model selection. Quantifying the resemblance of disease models to the human condition with single-cell technologies in an explainable, integrative, and generalizable manner remains a significant challenge. ResultsWe present singIST, a computational method for comparative single-cell transcriptomics analysis between disease models and human conditions. singIST provides explainable quantitative measures on disease model similarity to human condition at both pathway and cell type levels, highlighting the importance of each gene in the latter. These measures account for orthology, cell type presence in the disease model, cell type and gene importance in human condition, and gene changes in the disease model measured as fold change. This is achieved within a unifying framework that controls for the intrinsic complexities of single-cell data. We tested our method using three well-characterized murine models of moderate-to-severe Atopic Dermatitis, demonstrating its ability to recapitulate established biological knowledge while generating novel hypothesis through pathway-level analysis. Availability and implementationR library at https://github.com/DataScienceRD-Almirall/singIST and implementation code at https://github.com/DataScienceRD-Almirall/singIST_paper_results Author SummaryIn this study, we set out a method to improve how researchers evaluate disease models - tools that are essential for understanding human illness and developing new treatments. A major limitation of current methods is that they overlook the fine-scale differences between disease models and human conditions at the single-cell level. Yet, many diseases are driven by changes that occur in specific cell types. To address this, we developed singIST, a method that allows us to compare disease models to human diseases using single-cell gene expression data. What makes singIST unique is its ability to provide clear, interpretable measures of similarity between a disease model and the human condition, specifically at the level of cell types and groups of functionally related genes. We demonstrated the method using three well-characterized mouse models of atopic dermatitis and showed that singIST could both reflect known disease biology and uncover new insights into disease mechanisms. Further, we developed statistical tests to validate the trained models. Our approach is flexible and broadly applicable, making it a valuable tool for improving the selection and understanding of disease models in biomedical research.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Moruno-Cuenca, A., Picart-Armada, S., Perera-Lluna, A., Fernandez-Albert, F.. 2024-12-22. singIST: an integrative method for comparative single-cell trancriptomics between disease models and humans. https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.12.20.629624

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Uncovering Viral Signals Across Cell Populations in Colorectal Cancer

Viral sequences have been detected in colorectal cancer, but their cellular and anatomical distribution remains poorly resolved. We aimed to establish a cell-type-resolved map of viral reference-associated RNA signals across colorectal cancer, tumour-adjacent normal tissue, and healthy colon. We repurposed human-unmapped reads from single-cell RNA sequencing libraries generated in ten publicly available studies. We retained cell-barcode and unique molecular identifier information, removed duplicate molecules, and aligned reads to a curated human-associated viral reference using three aligners. Viral signals were analysed across cell types, tissue conditions, and colorectal segments. We used participant-grouped repeated cross-validation to evaluate tissue-condition classification and screened an independent paired colorectal cancer proteomics cohort for compatible peptide matches. The study included 547 libraries from 112 participants, including 49 with matched colorectal cancer and tumour-adjacent normal samples, and approximately 415,000 cells spanning ten major cell populations. Viral reference-associated RNA signals differed across epithelial, immune, stromal, and vascular compartments, tissue conditions, and anatomical regions of the colon. Of 318 independent healthy-reference viral-load comparisons, seven involving six virus-cell-type groups remained significant after Benjamini-Hochberg correction, including plasma-cell HHV-7 and HHV-6B and mast-cell HCV-2. Cell-type-resolved viral features distinguished colorectal cancer, tumour-adjacent normal tissue, and healthy colon in participant-grouped validation; random forest achieved a macro-AUC of 0.957 (SD 0.028), with HERV-K113 as the leading quantitative feature. An independent proteomic screen identified peptide matches compatible with 20 candidate viral groups. We established a cell-type-resolved map of viral reference-associated RNA signals across colorectal tissue conditions and anatomical regions. By identifying candidate viral signals in epithelial and immune compartments, this map provides a basis for investigating virus-host pathways involved in tumour biology, immune regulation, and antigen-presentation states, and could help prioritise future combination strategies pairing virus-directed or virus-mimetic approaches with standard treatment or immune checkpoint blockade.

bioinformatics↗

Statistical significance testing for spatial domain detection in spatial transcriptomics

In spatial transcriptomics, domain-detection methods group platform-specific spatial measurement units--cells, bins or multicellular spots--into spatial domains for comparing molecular programs, cellular composition and interactions among tissue regions. However, the number of candidate domains detected in the same tissue can vary with user-specified parameters or model-selection criteria. Whether candidate domains should be merged can be framed as a test of a single-domain null hypothesis, under which each gene has constant mean expression across all spatial units in the combined region. However, testing candidate domains on the same gene-expression data used to detect them may induce post-selection bias and yield anti-conservative p-values, increasing the risk of oversegmentation. To address these challenges, we introduce SigDoTS (statistical Significance testing for Domain deTection in Spatial transcriptomics), a hypothesis-testing framework for spatial domain detection. SigDoTS uses hierarchical testing to determine which candidate domains to retain or merge, with adjustment for family-wise error control. It accounts for gene-gene covariance and spatial dependence and computes p-values by rerunning the upstream domain-detection pipeline on datasets simulated under the fitted single-domain null. In simulations, SigDoTS controlled the type I error rate at the root node under the single-domain null and improved recovery of the true spatial domains when multiple domains were present. In human dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, SigDoTS retained superficial and deep Layer 6 domains but merged Layer 3 candidate domains across different initial numbers of candidate domains. In ovarian and colorectal cancers, SigDoTS retained epithelial domains with different gene-expression programs and local immune environments, together with immune, stromal and vascular domains.

bioinformatics↗

ASD Neuro Agentic (ANA): An Agentic Framework for Feature Discovery and Cross Site Generalization in Autism fMRI Classification

Classifiers of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) from resting state functional MRI rarely generalize across sites, and many reported accuracies are inflated by data leakage.We show that an agentic artificial intelligence framework, ASD Neuro Agentic (ANA), whose language model agents propose features from the literature and researcher input while fixed tools perform every calculation, can search auditably for site independent classifiers while controlling the leakage. In 1,028 participants from 17 ABIDE I centers, ANA tested 71 pipelines and selected a ComBat harmonized ensemble of tangent space connectivity models from six parcellations and 98 public connectivity derivatives. In leave one center out testing, the ensemble reached an area under the curve of 0.814 (95% CI, 0.773 to 0.841), outperforming ASD DiagNet and ASD SAENet. Predictive connectivity was mainly reduced in ASD. Agentic AI offers a systematic and efficient approach to exploring, evaluating, and identifying pipelines as model selection grows complex.

bioinformatics↗