bioRxiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/bioRxiv

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2024.12.15.628551

In Silico Toxicity Assessment of Organophosphates: A DFT and Molecular Docking Study on Their Interaction with Human Serum Albumin (HSA)

Singh, T.·Shankhwar, N.·Sharma, N. R.·Kumar, A.·Verma, A. K.
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

This study presents an in silico analysis of the toxicity of Organophosphates (OPs) through their interaction with Human Serum Albumin (HSA) protein using density functional theory (DFT) and molecular docking approaches. Organophosphates, known for their widespread use as pesticides, have raised significant concerns due to their potential toxicological effects. To investigate the molecular mechanisms underlying OP toxicity, we conducted DFT calculations to determine the electronic properties and reactivity of selective OP compounds. Molecular docking simulations were performed to explore the binding affinity, interaction sites, and conformational changes of HSA upon exposure to OPs. The DFT analysis revealed key electronic descriptors, such as HOMO-LUMO gap and electrostatic potential, that indicate high reactivity of OPs with biological molecules. Docking results showed strong binding affinities between OPs and HSA, particularly at sites involved in metabolite and drug transport, suggesting potential interference with the proteins native function. The interaction of OPs with HSA was further supported by molecular dynamics simulations, which confirmed the stability of the OP-HSA complex over time. These findings provide critical insights into the molecular basis of organophosphate toxicity, emphasizing the importance of their interaction with HSA. The combined DFT and molecular docking approach offers a valuable framework for predicting the toxicological behavior of OPs and lays the foundation for further in vitro and in vivo studies. Graphical Abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=158 SRC="FIGDIR/small/628551v3_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (46K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@881814org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@e4cb5forg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@e3cb74org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1426bb4_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Explore related subjects

bioinformaticsPreprint

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Singh, T., Shankhwar, N., Sharma, N. R., Kumar, A., Verma, A. K.. 2024-12-17. In Silico Toxicity Assessment of Organophosphates: A DFT and Molecular Docking Study on Their Interaction with Human Serum Albumin (HSA). https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.12.15.628551

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

bioRxiv2026

deepTools4: Faster, Scalable, and Modernized Genomic Data Analysis

The deepTools suite is widely used for quality control, summarization, and visualization of high-throughput sequencing data. However, as genomic datasets grow in scale and depth, existing tools often become computational bottlenecks. We present deepTools4, a modernized framework designed for high performance, scalability, and enhanced usability, while maintaining seamless integration with the Galaxy platform. Core functionality has been rewritten and thoroughly benchmarked, achieving substantial computational speed-ups. Visualization tools have been modernized to provide more intuitive, high-quality graphical outputs. In addition, our testing framework has been expanded to facilitate continuous development and ensure robustness. We demonstrate the utility of deepTools4 across diverse epigenomics and transcriptomics datasets, highlighting its ability to summarize genome-wide signals, apply a wide range of common normalization methods, and visualize enrichment patterns. The enhanced deepTools4 framework delivers a faster, more scalable solution for reproducible genome-wide analysis and interpretation across many sequencing modalities. Availability: https://github.com/deeptools/deepTools/

bioinformatics↗
bioRxiv2026

Reproducibility and cross-dataset concordance of drug-induced transcriptional responses

Drug-perturbation transcriptomic resources are expanding, but the reproducibility and cross-source consistency of the responses they measure remain critical to their use. We compared six resources using independent replicates, matched-drug analyses, and response decomposition. High agreement in treated expression did not translate into equally repeatable drug-induced changes. Cross-source response concordance was generally limited, including under matched cell and treatment conditions, although some comparisons retained drug-specific information. In Tahoe, a control-expression-only baseline left substantial drug-specific variation unresolved. Measured drug main effects - the average responses across cell lines - provided information for predicting cell-specific interactions, with this relationship retained in a cross-plate validation. Exploratory analyses of structure, target, and external-response representations identified modest signals in selected pipelines. Together, these analyses characterize the reliability and transferability of current perturbation resources and identify prediction of drug main effects as a key bottleneck in the framework examined, motivating shared reference measurements and better recovery of drug-specific responses.

bioinformatics↗
bioRxiv2026

Propensity-Adjusted AUC under Nuisance-Model Misspecification

Propensity adjustment compares medical-image detector scores within groups with similar measured properties, such as stain or focus. We examine its sensitivity to the nuisance model that forms those groups. Under Gaussian latent-index assumptions and exact linear-index strata, a closed-form correlation gives an exact boundary for adjusted AUC to fall below one half. Quadrature matches 36 simulation cells within 0.008. Inflation and attenuation relative to correct adjustment are empirical findings, not general ordering results. An overlap screen and a self-stratified control introduced for this study miss 140 of 141 simulated cells with absolute error above 0.05: checking the fitted propensity cannot certify completeness of the adjustment set. On real pathology corpora, logistic and boosted-tree models using the same 16 features disagree. Among splits where both pass both checks, mean adjusted-AUC gaps are 0.057 on acid-fast bacilli (AFB), 0.048 on Kaggle, and 0.049 on PCam, over three, five, and three splits respectively. These gaps measure model sensitivity; neither estimate is known to be correct. A controlled colour shift moves adjusted AUC relative to model-specific references in the predicted direction in 78 of 80 label-dependent cells. Broader balance and label-fit diagnostics favour trees without certifying their adjusted AUC. We recommend reporting sensitivity across nuisance models alongside these diagnostics. Reversal relative to known truth occurs in constructed stress tests; its frequency in practice remains unknown.

bioinformatics↗