bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2024.12.06.627162

Leaving Science: Attrition of Biologists in 38 OECD Countries

Abstract

This study examines biologists leaving science in 38 OECD countries in the past two decades. We use publication metadata from a global bibliometric database (raw Scopus data at the micro-level of individual scientists). In a cohort-based and longitudinal fashion, we follow individual men and women scientists over time, from their first to their last publication (N=86,178). We examine four academic disciplines: AGRI (agricultural and biological sciences), BIO (biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology), IMMU (immunology and microbiology), and NEURO (neuroscience). We apply survival analysis, conceptualizing scientific life as a sequence of scholarly publishing events. Our Kaplan-Meier survival analysis shows how women disappear from science: in BIO, about 60% are still in science after 5 years, 40% after 10 years, and only 20% by the end of the period examined (i.e., after 19 years). The percentages are substantially higher for men: approximately 70%, 50%, and 30%, respectively. Kaplan-Meier estimations indicate that women in the largest discipline (BIO) are 23.26% more likely to leave science after 10 years and 39.74% more likely to leave science at the end of the study period. Gender difference in attrition, slightly visible after 5 years, increase consistently in later career stages. The probability of surviving for women after 15 years varies considerably, from 47.8% in AGRI to 27.6% in IMMU; for men, the probability is about a fifth higher. Our data show that with the passage of time, women disappear from science in ever-larger proportions compared to men. Gender differences in attrition in the four disciplines have been and continue to be high, but comparing the 2000 and 2010 cohorts, have slightly decreased over time.

Source connections

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Kwiek, M., Szymula, L.. 2024-12-10. Leaving Science: Attrition of Biologists in 38 OECD Countries. https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.12.06.627162

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Evaluating Large Language Models as Tools to Navigate Researchers in Rapidly Evolving Research Landscapes: A Case Study in Cancer Drug Response Prediction

Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as promising tools for assisting researchers in automating and accelerating the synthesis of literature reviews. However, their reliability is a significant concern due to issues like factual inaccuracies and hallucinations. The key question is whether LLMs can reliably provide comprehensive, up-to-date overviews and analyses. This study evaluates the performance of three leading LLMs (OpenAI's ChatGPT, Google's Gemini, and DeepSeek) on the complex task of generating a comprehensive survey paper on deep learning for cancer Drug Response Prediction (DRP). By testing both standard and Deep Research (DR) / Deep Think (DT) modes of LLMs with prompts of varying detail, this paper assesses key academic dimensions, including reference management, content quality, and analytical depth. Key findings reveal that while DR modes of LLMs significantly improve reliability by eliminating hallucinations, performance variations exist across models and prompts. A trade-off between reference quantity and integration quality was observed, and even the best-performing models lacked the analytical depth of human experts, often requiring extensive human supervision. The study concludes that LLMs currently serve as powerful assistive tools but still cannot replace the critical validation and synthesis provided by human researchers. Choosing the best LLM to use depends on the task in hand, while several strategies can be implemented to improve the produced output.

scientific communication and education↗

A strong start for sustained success: inclusivity through a national group mentorship program for first-year graduate students

In the United States, STEM graduate programs and workforce do not represent the demographics of the population. Obstacles, including a lack of transparency, community, and accessible information in navigating academia, disproportionately affect students from underserved backgrounds. Peer mentoring networks can address these disparities. Here, we describe Cientifico Latino, Inc.s Graduate Student Engagement and Community (CL-GSEC) program, a nationwide, group-based peer mentorship program that has served first-year graduate students across the U.S., especially those from underserved backgrounds. Surveys indicate CL-GSEC positively impacts the first-year graduate experience. We highlight key program features, challenges, and insights, such as financial strains faced by first-year graduate students. We offer suggestions for how faculty and departments can better support students during this critical early stage of graduate training. We hope that reporting on CL-GSECs program structure, evaluations, and findings will guide educational leaders in expanding programming for junior graduate students.

scientific communication and education↗

Biodesign Buddy: Integrating Generative Artificial Intelligence in Academic Biodesign

Biodesign is an interdisciplinary research domain that incorporates principles from design and the life sciences to develop new systems, processes, and objects. Collegiate biodesign educators face unique pedagogical challenges, including an absence of relevant scholarship on curriculum design and instructional best practices for cultivating student scientific literacy. These difficulties may be overcome with newly available technologies, like generative AI systems, that enable personalized learning through domain-specific semantic spaces. This article examines the instructional value of one such domain-specific LLM, Biodesign Buddy, through a mixed-methods analysis of an eight-week study involving 64 students participating in an international biodesign competition. Results indicate strong support for integrating AI into biodesign coursework. Surveys captured attitudes toward AI, scientific literature, and learning experiences to assess AIs impact on learning outcomes. Findings suggest that integrating AI into biodesign pedagogy can meaningfully redress conceptual issues in biodesign while informing broader debates on AIs role in higher education. Impact StatementThis article introduces Biodesign Buddy, a domain-specific generative AI system for collegiate biodesign education, and reports on its exploratory deployment, offering design principles and preliminary findings to inform the development of AI-supported pedagogies for interdisciplinary biodesign instruction.

scientific communication and education↗