bioRxiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/bioRxiv

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2024.10.28.620727

Chromosomal and gonadal sex have differing effects on social motivation in mice

Chaturvedi, S. M.·Sarafinovska, S.·Selmanovic, D.·McCullough, K. B.·Swift, R. G.·Maloney, S. E.·Dougherty, J. D.
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Plain English SummaryAs our brain develops, many factors influence how we behave later in life. The brain forms differently in males and females, potentially leading to sex variation seen in many behaviors including sociability. In addition, conditions defined by differences in social behaviors, such as autism, are diagnosed more in males than females. However, researchers dont know exactly how distinct sex factors, such as hormones and sex chromosome genes, lead to different behaviors in males and females. In this study, we used mouse models and tests of mouse behavior to explore these differences. Results show that sex hormones primarily contributed to differences in social motivation between sexes. Yet when we repeated these same assays in a mouse model of genetic liability for a human neurodevelopmental syndrome, we found that sex chromosome genes rather than sex hormones played a larger role in the behavioral consequences of impaired neurodevelopment. These insights can inform future research on the biological mechanisms of social behavior in the context of genetic liability for neurodevelopmental disorders. HighlightsO_LIFour-core genotype mouse model crossed with MYT1L heterozygous mouse revealed independent effects of chromosomal and gonadal sex on social motivation. C_LIO_LIMyt1l haploinsufficiency was associated with increased activity in both males and females. C_LIO_LIWhile females are more active, contributions of chromosomes and gonadal hormones to this sex effect are environment dependent. C_LIO_LIPresence of ovaries was associated with increased measures of social seeking and orienting regardless of genotype. C_LIO_LIChromosomal sex interacted with MYT1L genotype, with increased social orienting and seeking specifically in XX MYT1L heterozygous mice. C_LI BackgroundSex differences in brain development are thought to lead to sex variation in social behavior. Sex differences are fundamentally driven by both gonadal (i.e., hormonal) and chromosomal sex, yet little is known about the independent effects of each on social behavior. Further, mouse models of the genetic liability for the neurodevelopmental disorder MYT1L Syndrome have shown sex specific deficits in social motivation. In this study, we aimed to determine if hormonal or chromosomal sex primarily mediate the sex differences seen in mouse social behavior, both at baseline and in the context of Myt1l haploinsufficiency. MethodsFour-core genotype (FCG) mice, which uncouple gonadal and chromosomal sex, were crossed with MYT1L heterozygous mice to create eight different groups with unique combinations of sex factors and MYT1L genotype. A total of 131 mice from all eight groups were assayed for activity and social behavior via the open field and social operant paradigms. Measures of social seeking and orienting were analyzed for main effects of chromosome, gonads, and their interactions with Myt1l mutation. ResultsThe FCGxMYT1L cross revealed independent effects of both gonadal and chromosomal sex on activity and social behavior. Specifically, the presence of ovaries, and by extension the presence of ovarian hormones, increased overall activity, social seeking, and social orienting regardless of genotype. In contrast, sex chromosomes affected social behavior mainly in the MYT1L heterozygous group, with XX sex karyotype when combined with MYT1L genotype contributing to increased social orienting and seeking. ConclusionsGonadal and chromosomal sex have independent mechanisms of driving increased social motivation in females. Additionally, sex chromosomes may interact with neurodevelopmental mutations to influence sex variation in atypical social behavior.

Source connections

Explore related subjects

animal behavior and cognitionPreprint

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Chaturvedi, S. M., Sarafinovska, S., Selmanovic, D., McCullough, K. B., Swift, R. G., Maloney, S. E., Dougherty, J. D.. 2024-10-29. Chromosomal and gonadal sex have differing effects on social motivation in mice. https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.28.620727

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

bioRxiv2026

roostR: An R package to examine diel activity patterns from Motus radio telemetry data

1. Monitoring the diel activity patterns of free-living animals is a methodological challenge. Signal strength fluctuations from Very High Frequency (VHF) radio transmitters deployed within the Motus Wildlife Tracking System can be used as a proxy for activity. However, analytical tools to extract behavioral metrics that quantify activity patterns from these data are needed. 2. We developed roostR, an open-source R package that converts Motus detection data into quantitative behavioral metrics, including roost initiation and departure, roost duration, observation time, and restlessness. The package uses a sequential pipeline built around signal volatility and rolling medians to detect transitions between active and inactive states. Default parameter values were tuned using data from 55 dark-eyed juncos (Junco hyemalis) overwintering in southeastern Ohio. 3. We provide an example from a dark-eyed junco over a 58-day period. roostR estimated roost onset on 48 nights and departure on 56 mornings, with higher rolling median signal differences during the day than at night, consistent with a diurnal animal, and variable restlessness periods each night. We also used the package to estimate roost behavior of an American tree sparrow (Spizelloides arborea) over 43-nights. 4. roostR enables researchers to extract individual activity data from Motus datasets. Because all thresholds are user-adjustable, the pipeline is adaptable across species, tag specifications, and ecological contexts, enabling researchers to test hypotheses about how environmental factors influence diel activity patterns.

animal behavior and cognition↗
bioRxiv2026

Characterizing rhythmic wheel-turning behavioral patterns in cockroaches Rhyparobia maderae using machine learning

Organisms must adapt to environmental changes occurring across multiple time scales, with endogenous multiscale clocks coordinating physiology and behavior with recurring environmental rhythms, including the dominant 24-hour cycle and faster ultradian rhythms. The Madeira cockroach (Rhyparobia maderae) provides a suitable model for investigating such multiscale temporal organization. Here, locomotor activity was recorded in running-wheel experiments under constant darkness. While the endogenous circadian clock produces a clearly visible 24-hour rhythm, it remains unknown whether locomotor behavior also exhibits temporal patterns at additional time scales. These temporal patterns cannot be found by classical frequency analysis, as they are veiled by higher harmonics of the circadian rhythm which are in the same frequency range. Unsupervised machine learning methods such as K-Means clustering, self-organizing maps and Gaussian mixture are used in search for fast ultradian rhythms possibly linked to circadian cycles in locomotor activity. Prior to applying these methods, data metrics are defined which characterize bouts of activity (called activity impulses) compared to periods of reduced activity. A stochastic pattern was found in these activity metrics which characterizes the time distance between activity impulses. Across all approaches, a consistent ultradian rhythm of approximately one hour was identified in the timing of the activity maxima. This rhythm was mainly detected during the subjective night, suggesting circadian control, and appears to consist of two components with periods of approximately 40 minutes and 1.5 hours. The method proposed in this paper is applied to two cockroach groups with different levels of activity, and is generalizable to diverse datasets occurring in the form of a time series with a dominant rhythm.

animal behavior and cognition↗
bioRxiv2026

Social inequity aversion and fairness preference in polar bears

Decision-making is key to survival, with choices and behaviour typically shaped by evolutionary pressures to enhance fitness and minimize loss. Inequity aversion, the tendency to respond negatively to unequal reward distributions, is therefore unexpected, as acts of fairness may be costly to the individual in the short term. In social, cooperative species, however, fairness may enhance long-term benefits through stable social interactions. Inequity aversion is believed to promote cooperative social structures and has only been demonstrated in certain social species. Yet, solitary species have not been tested, and whether this behaviour depends on social cooperative structures is unknown. Examining solitary species could clarify whether inequity aversion reflects an adaptation to cooperation or a general cognitive capacity linked to social comparison and reward evaluation. We studied inequity aversion in polar bears (Ursus maritimus), a largely solitary species, using three complementary, non-invasive cognition tests on seven bears from two zoos in the Netherlands. (1) An impunity experiment assessing effort-based inequity, in which bears performed a standardized action to obtain food rewards. (2) A choice-based experiment testing active selection between equal and unequal reward distributions. (3) A no-task control experiment assessing responses to unequal reward distribution without effort. Under effort-based inequity, bears reduced task performance and increased task latency when a partner received a superior reward. Unequal reward distributions did not affect reward acceptance independent of effort. In the choice-based paradigm, bears preferentially selected equal reward distributions with a partner present. Although generalizability to wild populations is limited, these findings demonstrate behavioural aversion of social inequity in a non-cooperative species. Inequality aversion may therefore not be restricted to social, cooperative animals but instead reflect a broadly distributed cognitive mechanism that emerges under relevant social conditions. These findings challenge current theories and advance our understanding of the cognitive foundations of fairness-related behaviour in animals.

animal behavior and cognition↗