bioRxiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/bioRxiv

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2024.10.28.620727

Chromosomal and gonadal sex have differing effects on social motivation in mice

Chaturvedi, S. M.·Sarafinovska, S.·Selmanovic, D.·McCullough, K. B.·Swift, R. G.·Maloney, S. E.·Dougherty, J. D.
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Plain English SummaryAs our brain develops, many factors influence how we behave later in life. The brain forms differently in males and females, potentially leading to sex variation seen in many behaviors including sociability. In addition, conditions defined by differences in social behaviors, such as autism, are diagnosed more in males than females. However, researchers dont know exactly how distinct sex factors, such as hormones and sex chromosome genes, lead to different behaviors in males and females. In this study, we used mouse models and tests of mouse behavior to explore these differences. Results show that sex hormones primarily contributed to differences in social motivation between sexes. Yet when we repeated these same assays in a mouse model of genetic liability for a human neurodevelopmental syndrome, we found that sex chromosome genes rather than sex hormones played a larger role in the behavioral consequences of impaired neurodevelopment. These insights can inform future research on the biological mechanisms of social behavior in the context of genetic liability for neurodevelopmental disorders. HighlightsO_LIFour-core genotype mouse model crossed with MYT1L heterozygous mouse revealed independent effects of chromosomal and gonadal sex on social motivation. C_LIO_LIMyt1l haploinsufficiency was associated with increased activity in both males and females. C_LIO_LIWhile females are more active, contributions of chromosomes and gonadal hormones to this sex effect are environment dependent. C_LIO_LIPresence of ovaries was associated with increased measures of social seeking and orienting regardless of genotype. C_LIO_LIChromosomal sex interacted with MYT1L genotype, with increased social orienting and seeking specifically in XX MYT1L heterozygous mice. C_LI BackgroundSex differences in brain development are thought to lead to sex variation in social behavior. Sex differences are fundamentally driven by both gonadal (i.e., hormonal) and chromosomal sex, yet little is known about the independent effects of each on social behavior. Further, mouse models of the genetic liability for the neurodevelopmental disorder MYT1L Syndrome have shown sex specific deficits in social motivation. In this study, we aimed to determine if hormonal or chromosomal sex primarily mediate the sex differences seen in mouse social behavior, both at baseline and in the context of Myt1l haploinsufficiency. MethodsFour-core genotype (FCG) mice, which uncouple gonadal and chromosomal sex, were crossed with MYT1L heterozygous mice to create eight different groups with unique combinations of sex factors and MYT1L genotype. A total of 131 mice from all eight groups were assayed for activity and social behavior via the open field and social operant paradigms. Measures of social seeking and orienting were analyzed for main effects of chromosome, gonads, and their interactions with Myt1l mutation. ResultsThe FCGxMYT1L cross revealed independent effects of both gonadal and chromosomal sex on activity and social behavior. Specifically, the presence of ovaries, and by extension the presence of ovarian hormones, increased overall activity, social seeking, and social orienting regardless of genotype. In contrast, sex chromosomes affected social behavior mainly in the MYT1L heterozygous group, with XX sex karyotype when combined with MYT1L genotype contributing to increased social orienting and seeking. ConclusionsGonadal and chromosomal sex have independent mechanisms of driving increased social motivation in females. Additionally, sex chromosomes may interact with neurodevelopmental mutations to influence sex variation in atypical social behavior.

Source connections

Explore related subjects

animal behavior and cognitionPreprint

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Chaturvedi, S. M., Sarafinovska, S., Selmanovic, D., McCullough, K. B., Swift, R. G., Maloney, S. E., Dougherty, J. D.. 2024-10-29. Chromosomal and gonadal sex have differing effects on social motivation in mice. https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.28.620727

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

bioRxiv2026

Deconstructing Boldness: Latent behavioural structure across novelty, predation, and exploration in an endangered species translocation program

Risk-related behaviours including neophobia, exploration, and predator avoidance are often assumed to covary along a general boldness axis. Although some translocation studies have linked one or more of these behaviours with fitness, it is possible that the underlying behavioural structure varies under different selective environments. Conservation breeding programs provide a unique opportunity to evaluate the structure of behavioural correlations in a non-domestic species under artificial conditions. We tested whether risk-related behaviours represent a unified boldness syndrome in a captive population of the endangered Attwaters prairie chicken (APC; Tympanuchus cupido attwateri). We quantified the repeatable behaviours of 257 juveniles and compared 11 models of behavioural covariation structure using multivariate mixed models and confirmatory factor analysis. There was no support for a single risk-taking axis; instead, we found three dimensions representing responses to novelty and environmental stimuli (Engagement), predator avoidance (Threat Response), and maze exploration (Maze Progression). Our results indicate that these risk-related behaviours are not organized along a single axis in captive APCs, challenging assumptions that risk-taking represents a universal behavioural syndrome. To anticipate post-release success accurately, conservation managers should understand the exact behavioural architecture of the captive population rather than assume that the classical bold-shy structure occurs in all contexts.

animal behavior and cognition↗
bioRxiv2026

Shared brain transcriptome signatures of social evolution and plasticity in shell-dwelling cichlid fishes

Inter-individual variability in phenotypic traits is widespread in nature both across and within species, with similar patterns of variation often occurring between and within species. Given that these two types of variation are generated by evolutionary and plasticity processes respectively, it raises the question to what extent the causal mechanisms underlying such variability at these two different levels are shared or not. To address this question, we studied the variation in brain transcriptomes in Tanganyikan cichlids that exhibit both intra- and interspecific variation in social behavior. We compared two facultatively social cichlid species, each containing naturally occurring solitary and social-living individuals, with a closely related obligatory solitary resembling the ancestral state. Differential gene expression and Gene Set Enrichment Analyses were performed in the telencephalon and diencephalon transcriptomes to investigate the molecular basis of both behavioral plasticity and the evolution of sociality. Behavioral plasticity involved few differentially expressed genes but extensive changes in biological pathways, supporting a highly polygenic architecture of social behavior. Across both species, social-living individuals consistently upregulated pathways involved in translation, protein homeostasis, and energy metabolism, whereas solitary individuals showed enrichment of neuronal morphogenesis, cell adhesion, and structural plasticity. Remarkably, these same functional programs were associated with the independent evolution of sociality, revealing a strong overlap between evolutionary and plastic transcriptional responses. This convergence was largely restricted to the telencephalon, while the diencephalon showed limited and inconsistent functional signatures. Together, our results support the repeated recruitment of gene regulatory programs during the evolution of sociality and demonstrate that behavioral plasticity and evolutionary transitions share common neurogenomic responses, consistent with a conserved genetic toolkit for social behavior.

animal behavior and cognition↗
bioRxiv2026

Inductive bias anchors a scaling law for biological learning

The speed of animal learning varies substantially across individuals and task domains, and does not always track intuitive notions of task complexity. A nominally simple binary decision task can take thousands of rewards to reach proficiency, whereas seemingly complex naturalistic tasks can be learned within dozens. A long-standing explanation is that learning speed reflects the alignment between an animal's inductive biases and the task at hand. However, without a precise notion of alignment, it is difficult to translate this idea into quantitative predictions. Here, modeling an animal as a Bayesian learner that improves through iterative reward feedback, we use statistical learning theory to derive a scaling law for biological learning. The law makes two predictions. First, inductive bias multiplicatively sets the speed of learning through a single quantity, the effective complexity. This quantity measures how well the task aligns with the animal's prior, and corresponds to the number of bits required to represent the task solution under that prior. We demonstrate this multiplicative scaling in a human motor learning dataset, where behavioral measurements before learning can precisely predict subsequent learning speed. Second, task performance improves as a power law in experience. We validate this power law in a large-scale mouse learning dataset and show that a two-parameter rescaling collapses individual learning curves onto a universal function predicted by the theory. These results suggest that behavioral measurements before learning can be used to predict task-dependent learning speeds, and they explain why learning speed reflects alignment with prior knowledge rather than nominal task complexity.

animal behavior and cognition↗