bioRxiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/bioRxiv

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2024.10.24.620073

The metabolic costs of meiotic drive

Bradshaw, S. L.·Rodriguez, E.·Wang, H.·Yu, C. T.·De La Noue, C. D. V.·Hafezjee, A.·Pomiankowski, A.·Camus, M. F.
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Selfish genetic elements, such as meiotic drive genes, disrupt Mendels law of equal segregation by biasing their own transmission, often at a detriment to the rest of the genome. The Malaysian stalk-eyed fly (Teleopsis dalmanni) sex-ratio (SR) meiotic drive system is located within a series of large inversions on the X chromosome subject to low recombination and is associated with deleterious effects on fitness. Here we examine the metabolic effects of meiotic drive across male and female stalk-eyed flies. High-resolution O2k respirometry coupled with whole-organism respirometry were used to obtain mitochondrial function and metabolic rates. Complimentary assays on food consumption established downstream effects of metabolism on nutrient acquisition. The experiments demonstrate that individuals with SR meiotic drive elements have impaired mitochondrial function and reduced capacity for ATP synthesis, as shown by a lower respiratory control ratio and weaker contribution of Complex I to respiration. Drive individuals also exhibited an increased basal metabolic rate and consumed a greater amount of food than wild-type individuals. These findings show that the drive genotype imposes metabolic costs in both male and female hosts. The disruption in mitochondrial function likely leads to compensation via an increase in both basal metabolic rate and nutrient acquisition. A potential cause lies in the accumulation of deleterious mutations in the inversions on the X chromosome that house the meiotic drive, which are subject to weak natural selection. In females, the drive chromosome has a dominant effect, with a single copy causing substantial metabolic compromise. There was little evidence of male-specific metabolic costs, nor evidence of an accumulation of sexually antagonistic effects of drive chromosomes on female metabolism. These results suggest that direct metabolic costs from meiotic drive on spermatogenesis and from sexually antagonistic selection are relatively weak. This research provides new insight into the interplay between meiotic drive and metabolism, drawing attention to the broader physiological repercussions selfish genetic elements may have on their hosts.

Source connections

Explore related subjects

evolutionary biologyPreprint

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Bradshaw, S. L., Rodriguez, E., Wang, H., Yu, C. T., De La Noue, C. D. V., Hafezjee, A., Pomiankowski, A., Camus, M. F.. 2024-10-29. The metabolic costs of meiotic drive. https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.24.620073

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

bioRxiv2026

Ocean current models predict spatial structure for coastal biodiversity

Genomic diversity provides the raw material through which all evolutionary processes occur. Accurately describing how environmental features affect patterns of diversity shows promise in predicting the resilience of populations and entire communities to dynamic environments and novel stressors. Identifying the contribution of purely neutral responses to environmental effects can be difficult, especially across large spatial ranges with many covarying environmental features. Using an individual-based model of larvae carried by ocean currents, we predict patterns of neutral genomic diversity in a passively dispersed coastal species, suggesting large geographic regions of relative homogeneity with ancestry determined by the nearest "upstream" population with limited larval input. The genomic identity that dominates each region sharply transitions at the next such interruption, generating hierarchical structure and violating assumptions of isolation-by-distance. We call these upstream populations "lineage source regions" (LSRs), and we find strong concordance between LSR model predictions and an empirical population genomic survey of a keystone salt marsh mussel (Geukensia demissa). We quantitatively validate model performance and goodness-of-fit, updating baseline predictions of genomic diversity patterns from the classic isolation-by-distance model to this LSR framework. This spatially explicit coastal ancestry model has potential for generalization across passive dispersing species.

evolutionary biology↗
bioRxiv2026

TaxaAudit: A statistical model of consensus in phylogenetics identifies non-monophyletic taxa

Interpreting variation in genes and traits across species requires understanding their evolutionary relationships. Taxonomic hierarchies provide a practical approximation of the tree of life, with the NCBI taxonomy linking this framework directly to public sequence data. Some named groups, however, are not evolutionary clades, and recognizing these exceptions requires knowledge scattered across the phylogenetics literature. Here we introduce TaxaAudit, a statistical model that identifies taxonomic groups whose monophyly is repeatedly contradicted by published phylogenies. The model accounts for background taxonomic conflict and the ability of each study's species sampling to expose non-monophyly. Applied to 5,865 molecular phylogenies from TimeTree, TaxaAudit flagged 516 NCBI taxa at family rank and below for significant recurrent contradiction of monophyly. Excluding these taxa's monophyly requirements improved the taxonomy's agreement with independent phylogenomic reference trees and phylogenies withheld from discovery. Flagged taxa were also 3.61 times as likely as matched controls to have their monophyly challenged in publications outside the discovery set. In tree-inference experiments, excluding these monophyly constraints improved agreement with reference phylogenies relative to enforcing the unmodified taxonomy. By identifying groups whose monophyly should not be assumed, TaxaAudit lets researchers draw on published phylogenetic knowledge without reviewing the specialist literature for every taxon. This supports broader use of the NCBI taxonomy as an evolutionary framework for biological comparisons.

evolutionary biology↗
bioRxiv2026

Shared landscape, divergent genomes: Comparative population genomics of co-occurring flora in an isolated Australian mountain range

Understanding how landscape heterogeneity shapes genomic variation is key to conserving biodiversity and evolutionary potential. Yet conservation genomics is typically conducted at the single species level, limiting our ability to identify shared genomic patterns or understand how co-occurring taxa differ in their response to common environmental gradients. We assessed spatial patterns of genomic variation and their associations with geographic and environmental features among populations of nine co-existing plant species with contrasting life-histories and ecological traits across Gariwerd, a threatened biodiversity hotspot in south-eastern Australia. All species exhibited weak overall genetic structure, although the magnitude and spatial distribution of differentiation varied among species. Despite this variation, broadly consistent spatial trends were apparent, with higher genomic divergence largely concentrated in central zones and higher genomic diversity localised in southern regions of the landscape. Significant associations between genetic differentiation and geographic distance were observed in three species, while another species showed associations with environmental distance. These findings demonstrate that coexisting species can show overlapping spatial patterns in genomic variation while differing markedly in their associations with geographic and environmental variation across the same landscape. This comparative approach provides a basis for spatial prioritisation and conservation planning, while highlighting the complex eco-evolutionary processes operating across heterogeneous landscapes.

evolutionary biology↗