Unraveling genetic load dynamics during biological invasion: insights from two invasive insect species

Abstract

Many invasive species undergo a significant reduction in genetic diversity, i.e. a genetic bottleneck, in the early stages of invasion. However, this reduction does not necessarily prevent them from achieving considerable ecological success and becoming highly efficient colonizers. Here we investigated the purge hypothesis, which suggests that demographic bottlenecks may facilitate conditions (e.g., increased homozygosity and inbreeding) under which natural selection can purge deleterious mutations, thereby reducing genetic load. We used a transcriptome-based exome capture protocol to identify thousands of SNPs in coding regions of native and invasive populations of two highly successful invasive insect species, the western corn rootworm (Chrysomelidae: Diabrotica virgifera virgifera) and the harlequin ladybird (Coccinelidae: Harmonia axyridis). We categorized and polarized SNPs to investigate changes in genetic load between invasive populations and their sources. Our results differed between species. In D. virgifera virgifera, although there was a general reduction in genetic diversity in invasive populations, including that associated with genetic load, we found no clear evidence for purging of genetic load, except marginally for highly deleterious mutations in one European population. Conversely, in H. axyridis, the reduction in genetic diversity was minimal, and we detected signs of genetic load fixation in invasive populations. These findings provide new insights into the evolution of genetic load during invasions, but do not offer a definitive answer to the purge hypothesis. Future research should include larger genomic datasets and a broader range of invasive species to further elucidate these dynamics.