bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2024.08.29.610235

Functional divergence of conserved developmental plasticity genes between two distantly related nematodes

Abstract

Genes diverge in form and function in multiple ways over time; they can be conserved, acquire new roles, or eventually be lost. However, the way genes diverge at the functional level is little understood, particularly in plastic systems. We investigated this process using two distantly related nematode species, Allodiplogaster sudhausi and Pristionchus pacificus. Both these nematodes display environmentally-influenced developmental plasticity of mouth-form feeding structures. This phenotype can be manipulated by growth on particular diets, making them ideal traits to investigate functional divergence of developmental plasticity genes between organisms. Using CRISPR-engineered mutations in A. sudhausi mouth-form genes, we demonstrate examples of the various ways ancestral genes regulate developmental plasticity and how these roles can progressively diverge. We examined four ancestral genes, revealing distinct differences in their conservation and functional divergence in regulating the mouth phenotype in both species. Specifically, certain genes retain the same characteristics, while others have acquired a new function. Additionally, two ancestral genes retain their functions as switch genes, which completely prevent a phenotype, and the other two display quantitative effects, with knockouts in these genes displaying intermediate phenotypes. Remarkably, despite the evolutionary distance, all genes examined were involved in mouth-form regulation. Finally, multiple gene knock-out mutants were engineered, with key sulfatase-encoding genes acting downstream of all others, suggesting they play a major role in mouth-form plasticity. Together, this study represents the first mutant-based functional analysis of the evolution of developmental plasticity between two highly diverged species, offering new insights into the genetic mechanisms underlying phenotypic evolution. Article SummaryWhile evolutionary divergence of genes is well-studied at the sequence level, the resulting functional and phenotypic consequences are less known, particularly in plastic systems. Here, we examined functional divergence of a set of genes involved in developmental plasticity of mouth-form between two highly diverged nematode species. We found that all studied genes control mouth-form plasticity in both species; however, with strong functional divergence and gene-specific quantitative effects or even novel functions. Thus, there is a spectrum from full conservation, partial conservation to the gain of a new function; with genes involved in sulfation showing the strongest conservation during evolution.

Source connections

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Wighard, S., Witte, H., Sommer, R. J.. 2024-08-29. Functional divergence of conserved developmental plasticity genes between two distantly related nematodes. https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.29.610235

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

RELAX does not reproduce its own estimates at default settings, and its output does not show it

Selection-intensity estimates from RELAX are reported as a point value of K with a likelihood-ratio P. We report that, at default settings and on data of ordinary size, the program does not reproduce its own fits. Of 27 enzyme entries refitted under two optimiser configurations, none reproduced its log-likelihood to within 0.01 units; the median change was 103 units, the largest over 3,400, and four verdicts reversed. Eighty null orthologues reproduced none. A byte-identical command returned a distinct likelihood on every repetition, single-threaded, across three releases, and on alignments simulated under the fitted model, where 3.3 per cent of replicates reproduced. The documented random-number seed never reaches the generator when assigned on the command line, yet reads back as the value supplied. PAML localises the cause: its two-ratio model, without site classes, reproduced its log-likelihood for all 288 genes; its site-class models agreed for 27 to 67 per cent. The instability follows the mixture over sites, not the program. The output does not show it: 46 of 410 fits ended with a negative likelihood-ratio statistic, impossible under convergence, and 123 of 410 report a K re-estimated under a domain restriction rather than the unconstrained maximum. Of 234 published studies using RELAX, none reported a seed. Seeding while holding the thread count at one reproduced sixty of sixty runs on twenty genes under two releases; the seed alone reproduced none of five, and no documentation states the second condition. We recommend that fits be repeated and their dispersion published.

evolutionary biology↗

Sequential accumulation of adaptive alleles forms an inversion supergene in deer mice

Supergenes are clusters of co-inherited loci that affect multiple or complex phenotypes. Despite the growing number of chromosomal inversions identified as supergenes in natural populations, their molecular basis and evolutionary history often remain obscure. Here, we identified two candidate genes, Slc45a2 and Npr3, within a 41-Mb inversion supergene in the deer mouse (Peromyscus maniculatus) that respectively drive darker coats and longer tails - two traits associated with forest adaptation. Mice homozygous for the inversion (inv/inv) exhibit elevated Slc45a2 expression in melanocytes relative to the congenic standard genotype (std/std), disrupting pheomelanin production. In parallel, downregulation of Npr3 in inv/inv mouse growth plates prolongs postnatal growth of caudal vertebrae, resulting in tail elongation. Population-level analyses further implicate that this supergene arose through the subsequent accumulation of the Npr3 allele within the inversion, rather than by capturing all beneficial mutations at its origin.

evolutionary biology↗

Toxin structure shapes palatability in a chemically defended butterfly

The toxicity of chemical defences is well studied, but the potential contribution of compound structure to predator deterrence remains largely unexplored. Whether predation acts more strongly on toxicity or unpalatability remains largely untested, partly because few systems allow toxin structure to vary independently of quantity. Heliconius sara larvae provide such a system: those reared on Passiflora auriculata sequester cyclopentenyl cyanogenic glucosides (CGs), while those reared on P. biflora biosynthesise comparable quantities of aliphatic CGs. Using two invertebrate predators, Camponotus floridanus ants and Hierodula membranacea mantids, we tested whether this structural difference affects palatability independent of toxicity. Mantids rejected larvae with cyclopentenyl CGs more often than larvae with aliphatic CGs, despite no detectable difference in total CG content. This pattern was mirrored in extract-based assays with ants, independently of cyanide release: extracts with cyclopentenyl CGs remained deterrent, while extracts with aliphatic CGs did not differ in deterrence from water. Live larvae, by contrast, elicited similar responses from ants regardless of CG structure. These results show that variation in toxin structure can strongly affect palatability, with some compounds conferring greater protection than others. This demonstrates the importance of chemical structural diversity in the evolution of chemical defences.

evolutionary biology↗