bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2024.08.23.609317

Phylogenomics, Classification, and Lifestyle Evolution in Raft- and Nursery web- Spiders (Araneae: Dolomedidae and Pisauridae)

Abstract

Pisauridae Simon, 1890 or "nursery web spiders" are a global and heterogenous assemblage of spider genera with diverse lifestyles, containing web builders and webless species, as well as terrestrial and semi-aquatic species, notably "fishing spiders", genus Dolomedes Latreille, 1804. Incomplete, unresolved, or conflicting phylogenies have so far hampered testing for Dolomedes and pisaurid monophyly and evolution. Here, we broadly address these questions within a phylogenomic and comparative framework. Our goals are i) reconstruction of a robust phylogeny to test the monophyly of Dolomedes and Pisauridae and to amend Dolomedes classification; ii) estimation of evolutionary shifts and trends in lifestyles and capture webs; and iii) evaluation of hypotheses of morphological trait association with a semi-aquatic lifestyle. To this end we generate subgenomic data (ultraconserved elements or UCE) for 53 Dolomedes species and 28 pisaurid genera. We analyze these data using maximum likelihood, Bayesian, and multi-species coalescence approaches, as well as using two different phylogenetic time calibration methods, RelTime and MCMCtree. Consistent across analytical approaches, our phylogenies reject the monophyly of both Pisauridae and Dolomedes. "Pisaurid" genera fall into three clades: 1) Focal Clade I groups the majority, including Pisaura Simon, 1886, hence representing true pisaurids; 2) Focal Clade II = Blandinia Tonini et al., 2016 is sister to Trechaleidae Simon, 1890 and Lycosidae Sundevall, 1833; 3) Focal Clade III with fishing and raft spiders groups Dolomedes, Megadolomedes Davies and Raven, 1980, and Ornodolomedes Raven and Hebron, 2018 and is sister to Focal Clade II, Trechaleidae, and Lycosidae. Our taxonomy, based on complementary taxa and morphological evidence, resurrects Dolomedidae Simon, 1876 to include Dolomedes and the Oceanic genera Bradystichus Simon, 1884, Megadolomedes, Caledomedes Raven and Hebron, 2018, Mangromedes Raven and Hebron, 2018, Ornodolomedes, and Tasmomedes Raven and Hebron, 2018. Both RelTime and MCMCtree analyses yield comparable divergence estimations: Pisauridae origin is estimated between 29 and 40 Ma; Blandinia between 21 and 34 Ma; Dolomedidae between 10 and 17 Ma; and Dolomedes between 9 and 16 Ma. In order to avoid misleading significant correlations and/or over-resolved ancestral states, we performed taxon sampling bias correction in all evolutionary analyses. Evolutionary analyses reconstruct semi-aquatic lifestyle as ancestral to a large clade containing pisaurids, lycosids, trechaleids, Blandinia, and dolomedids, with several reversals to terrestrial lifestyle. Capture webs evolved at least three times, with reversals. Counter to expectation, the evolution of lifestyles and capture webs are independent. Although leg and tarsus lengths do not indicate lifestyles, semi-aquatic taxa are significantly larger than terrestrial ones. We explain this pattern with a biomechanical threshold over which surface tension can be broken while spiders forage under water. Our time-calibrated analyses indicate that the evolution of terrestrial and web-building lifestyles from semi-aquatic ancestors in Pisauridae coincided with cooling and drying climates in the mid-Miocene. We therefore hypothesize that climatic changes have acted as strong selection pressures toward lifestyle diversification.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Yu, K.-P., Cheng, R.-C., Haddad, C. R., Tanikawa, A., Pett, B. L., Piacentini, L. N., Jager, P., Yip, H. Y., Suzuki, Y., Henrard, A., Painting, C. J., Vink, C. J., Hebets, E. A., Harvey, M. S., Kuntner, M.. 2024-08-24. Phylogenomics, Classification, and Lifestyle Evolution in Raft- and Nursery web- Spiders (Araneae: Dolomedidae and Pisauridae). https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.23.609317

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Ocean current models predict spatial structure for coastal biodiversity

Genomic diversity provides the raw material through which all evolutionary processes occur. Accurately describing how environmental features affect patterns of diversity shows promise in predicting the resilience of populations and entire communities to dynamic environments and novel stressors. Identifying the contribution of purely neutral responses to environmental effects can be difficult, especially across large spatial ranges with many covarying environmental features. Using an individual-based model of larvae carried by ocean currents, we predict patterns of neutral genomic diversity in a passively dispersed coastal species, suggesting large geographic regions of relative homogeneity with ancestry determined by the nearest "upstream" population with limited larval input. The genomic identity that dominates each region sharply transitions at the next such interruption, generating hierarchical structure and violating assumptions of isolation-by-distance. We call these upstream populations "lineage source regions" (LSRs), and we find strong concordance between LSR model predictions and an empirical population genomic survey of a keystone salt marsh mussel (Geukensia demissa). We quantitatively validate model performance and goodness-of-fit, updating baseline predictions of genomic diversity patterns from the classic isolation-by-distance model to this LSR framework. This spatially explicit coastal ancestry model has potential for generalization across passive dispersing species.

evolutionary biology↗

Shared landscape, divergent genomes: Comparative population genomics of co-occurring flora in an isolated Australian mountain range

Understanding how landscape heterogeneity shapes genomic variation is key to conserving biodiversity and evolutionary potential. Yet conservation genomics is typically conducted at the single species level, limiting our ability to identify shared genomic patterns or understand how co-occurring taxa differ in their response to common environmental gradients. We assessed spatial patterns of genomic variation and their associations with geographic and environmental features among populations of nine co-existing plant species with contrasting life-histories and ecological traits across Gariwerd, a threatened biodiversity hotspot in south-eastern Australia. All species exhibited weak overall genetic structure, although the magnitude and spatial distribution of differentiation varied among species. Despite this variation, broadly consistent spatial trends were apparent, with higher genomic divergence largely concentrated in central zones and higher genomic diversity localised in southern regions of the landscape. Significant associations between genetic differentiation and geographic distance were observed in three species, while another species showed associations with environmental distance. These findings demonstrate that coexisting species can show overlapping spatial patterns in genomic variation while differing markedly in their associations with geographic and environmental variation across the same landscape. This comparative approach provides a basis for spatial prioritisation and conservation planning, while highlighting the complex eco-evolutionary processes operating across heterogeneous landscapes.

evolutionary biology↗

BryoCAD: Extending Plant DNA Foundation Models Beyond Flowering Plants

Bryophytes exhibit diverse genome architectures and gene repertoires, yet their functional interpretation remains constrained by incomplete genomic annotations and limited experimental resources. Although DNA foundation models offer promising solutions, their applicability to evolutionarily divergent bryophytes remains largely unexplored. Here, we introduce BryoCAD, a DNA language model developed through continued pre-training of the angiosperm-specific PlantCAD2 model on 17 bryophyte genomes spanning hornworts, liverworts, and mosses. Across three representative bryophyte genomes and four gene-boundary motif recovery tasks, BryoCAD-Small improved mean zero-shot accuracy from 45.7% to 57.0%, a 24.8% relative increase over PlantCAD2-Small, while the over 200-fold larger Evo2-20B achieved a mean accuracy of only 39.3%. Remarkably, BryoCAD-Small outperformed PlantCAD2-Large in 11 of 12 motif-recovery comparisons across the three bryophytes, highlighting the benefits of lineage-specific adaptation over model scaling alone. These improvements extended to all six tested algal species, increasing mean accuracy from 26.3% to 37.5%, although performance varied across ferns and gymnosperms. BryoCAD also enhanced gene structure annotation: replacing PlantCAD2-Small with BryoCAD-Small increased transcript-level F1 scores from 0.578 to 0.625 in Marchantia polymorpha and from 0.485 to 0.530 in Physcomitrium patens. Together, our findings demonstrate that lineage-specific continued pre-training enhances genomic sequence interpretation and gene annotation across bryophytes, providing a transferable framework for extending DNA foundation models to evolutionarily diverse, understudied plant lineages.

evolutionary biology↗