bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2024.07.22.600610

Who Grows There? A Course-based Undergraduate Research Experience to explore the human microbiome through 16S DNA metabarcoding

Abstract

We describe a two week Course-based Undergraduate Research Experience (CURE) to introduce students to next-generation DNA sequencing, molecular biology methods and a bioinformatic workflow. The CURE is designed to take students with little to no technical and bioinformatic experience through key steps of the protocol through scaffolded laboratory and computational practicals. Our students extract and amplify human microbiome DNA using 16S ribosomal RNA specific primers, then construct a sequencing library for Oxford Nanopore based sequencing. They taxonomically assign the sequencing reads, and determine the ecological community composition using relevant software packages. Our students were able to successfully prepare sequencing libraries and analyse the data to produce relevant figures, demonstrating they met the learning objectives of the CURE. Students identified that they had developed higher level learning as defined by Blooms taxonomy, and that their confidence in practical work significantly increased as a result of doing the CURE. We share recommendations for implementation of the CURE in undergraduate curricula, and adaptations of the methods for use in schools outreach. Our CURE successfully provides training for students in genetic analysis in an enjoyable and relatively time and cost efficient manner, preparing them for future research or careers in modern molecular biology techniques.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Sellers, G. S., Freiheit, M., Winter, M. R., Joyce, D., Cullen, D., Lunt, D. H., Hubbard, K.. 2024-07-23. Who Grows There? A Course-based Undergraduate Research Experience to explore the human microbiome through 16S DNA metabarcoding. https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.22.600610

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Internal Grant Review: A Pre-Submission Program for Early-Career Clinical and Translational Researchers

The iTHRIV Scholars Mentored Career Development Program initiated an Internal Grant Review (IGR) program in 2020 for current and recently graduated Scholars seeking funding through K and R awards from the NIH. The IGR program is designed to replicate the NIH review process and provide Scholars the opportunity to receive valuable feedback on their applications prior to NIH submission. A key characteristic of the program is the integration of REDCap, enabling automation and year-round offering while improving tracking and reporting efforts and capabilities. Results of the program have been overall positive, both in proposal development and participant feedback. IGR is a sustainable, valuable resource for early-career faculty competing for limited resources in the pursuit to become independently funded clinical translational scientists.

scientific communication and education↗

Multi-Lab Testing of Early Preclinical Discoveries Identifies Promising Treatments

A fundamental challenge in drug development is the frequent failure of early laboratory research to translate into clinical benefit. One promising solution is to confirm findings from exploratory single-laboratory studies across multiple laboratories before clinical testing. We investigated this approach following the conduct of preclinical multi-laboratory studies across different fields of medicine. For this, we evaluated effect sizes, experimental rigor, and a set of criteria to identify determinants of confirmation success. When tested under increased rigor, only a fraction of multi-laboratory studies confirmed the initial results. The underlying effect size reduction was associated with outcome-relevant experimental differences between exploratory and confirmatory stages. In summary, multi-laboratory studies proved highly informative and served as an effective filter for promising treatments.

scientific communication and education↗

Technology-enhanced learning in undergraduate neuroscience education: tractography-based virtual dissection in psychology

Background: Neuroanatomy poses a significant challenge for Psychology students due to its spatial and conceptual complexity. Educational approaches that enhance the relevance and visualization of neuroanatomical content may improve students learning experiences. This study implemented a tractography-based activity focused on the virtual dissection of the arcuate fasciculus, a major white matter pathway, in undergraduate Psychology students and examined the relationships between perceived learning and students perceptions of utility, difficulty and handling, and organizational aspects of the activity. Methods: First-year undergraduate Psychology students participated in a two-session tractography-based activity combining instruction on white matter anatomy and diffusion tractography with a hands-on virtual dissection of the arcuate fasciculus using research-grade software routinely employed in neuroscience research. Following the activity, students completed an anonymous questionnaire assessing perceived learning, utility, difficulty and handling, and organizational aspects of the activity. Pearson correlations, multiple regression analyses, and relative importance analyses were performed. Results: Sixty-eight students completed the questionnaire. Students reported generally positive perceptions of the activity across the evaluated dimensions, with perceived learning receiving the highest mean score (M = 3.44, SD = .85). Perceived utility showed the strongest association with perceived learning (r = .64, p < .001). The regression model explained 41% of the variance in perceived learning (R2 = .41, adjusted R2 = .38, p < .001). Perceived utility was the only significant predictor in the model ({beta} = .59, p = .001), accounting for 67.9% of the explained variance. Conclusions: The findings support the feasibility of integrating authentic neuroimaging tools into undergraduate neuroanatomy teaching. Students who perceived the activity as more useful also reported higher perceived learning outcomes, with perceived utility emerging as the strongest predictor of perceived learning. In contrast, perceived difficulty and handling, and organizational aspects did not make significant independent contributions. These results suggest that students perceptions of educational relevance may play an important role in technology-enhanced STEM learning experiences.

scientific communication and education↗