Age-Associated Genetic and Environmental Contributions to Epigenetic Aging Across Adolescence and Emerging Adulthood

Kuznetsov, D. V.; Liu, Y.; Schowe, A. M.; Czamara, D.; Instinske, J.; Pahnke, C. K. L.; Noethen, M. M.; Spinath, F. M.; Binder, E. B.; Diewald, M.; Forstner, A. J.; Kandler, C.; Moenkediek, B.

doi:10.1101/2024.06.10.598273

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2024.06.10.598273

Age-Associated Genetic and Environmental Contributions to Epigenetic Aging Across Adolescence and Emerging Adulthood

Kuznetsov, D. V.·Liu, Y.·Schowe, A. M.·Czamara, D.·Instinske, J.·Pahnke, C. K. L.·Noethen, M. M.·Spinath, F. M.·Binder, E. B.·Diewald, M.·Forstner, A. J.·Kandler, C.·Moenkediek, B.

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

BackgroundEpigenetic aging estimators commonly track chronological and biological aging, quantifying its accumulation (i.e., epigenetic age acceleration) or speed (i.e., epigenetic aging pace). Their scores reflect a combination of inherent biological programming and the impact of environmental factors, which are suggested to vary at different life stages. The transition from adolescence to adulthood is an important period in this regard, marked by an increasing and, then, stabilizing epigenetic aging variance. Whether this pattern arises from environmental influences or genetic factors is still uncertain. This study delves into understanding the genetic and environmental contributions to variance in epigenetic aging across these developmental stages. Using twin modeling, we analyzed four estimators of epigenetic aging, namely Horvath Acceleration, PedBE Acceleration, GrimAge Acceleration, and DunedinPACE, based on saliva samples collected at two timepoints approximately 2.5 years apart from 976 twins of four birth cohorts (aged about 9.5, 15.5, 21.5, and 27.5 years at first and 12, 18, 24, and 30 years at second measurement occasion). ResultsHalf to two-thirds (50-68%) of the differences in epigenetic aging were due to unique environmental factors, indicating the role of life experiences and epigenetic drift, besides measurement error. The remaining variance was explained by genetic (Horvath Acceleration: 24%; GrimAge Acceleration: 32%; DunedinPACE: 47%) and shared environmental factors (Horvath Acceleration: 26%; PedBE Acceleration: 47%). The genetic and shared environmental factors represented the primary sources of stable differences in corresponding epigenetic aging estimators over 2.5 years. Age moderation analyses revealed that the variance due to individually-unique environmental sources was smaller in younger than in older cohorts in epigenetic aging estimators trained on chronological age (Horvath Acceleration: 47% to 49%; PedBE Acceleration: 33% to 68%). The variance due to genetic contributions, in turn, potentially increased across age groups for epigenetic aging estimators trained in adult samples (Horvath Acceleration: 18% to 39%; GrimAge Acceleration: 24% to 43%; DunedinPACE: 42% to 57%). ConclusionsTransition to adulthood is a period of the increasing variance in epigenetic aging. Both environmental and genetic factors contribute to this trend. The degree of environmental and genetic contributions can be partially explained by the design of epigenetic aging estimators.

Source connections

Published article ↗

Explore related subjects

genomics Preprint

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Kuznetsov, D. V., Liu, Y., Schowe, A. M., Czamara, D., Instinske, J., Pahnke, C. K. L., Noethen, M. M., Spinath, F. M., Binder, E. B., Diewald, M., Forstner, A. J., Kandler, C., Moenkediek, B.. 2024-06-12. Age-Associated Genetic and Environmental Contributions to Epigenetic Aging Across Adolescence and Emerging Adulthood. https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.06.10.598273

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

bioRxiv2026

MicroDUET: a dual-headed genomic foundation model for pathogen surveillance

Pathogen genomic surveillance works from raw reads, assembled genomes and alignments, representations that are slow and costly to compare at scale. Compact embeddings from genomic language models offer an alternative, but surveillance requires resolving both evolutionary ancestry (phylogeny) and phenotypic capability (function) - which need not co-vary. Here we present MicroDUET, which adapts a 26.6-million-parameter ProkBERT backbone with two 3.5-million-parameter adapter heads: a phylogeny head trained contrastively on genome windows from the same microbes, and a function head trained to identify genes across taxa. On held-out retrieval benchmarks, the phylogeny head returned the correct species for 80.3% and 66.6% of cellular and viral queries, and the function head the correct gene family for 97.3% and 97.2%, reaching 74.4% accuracy on an independent antimicrobial resistance-class benchmark. Across all three benchmarks MicroDUET outranked 17 other genomic encoders. Without training on lineage, clade or drug-susceptibility tasks, MicroDUET identified Mycobacterium tuberculosis and mpox virus lineages and clades (0.965, 0.975 accuracy), discriminated rifampicin resistance without lineage adjustment (AUROC 0.985), and retrospectively identified an emerging mpox lineage as anomalous (AUROC 0.974). MicroDUET operates 10^3 - 10^4 times faster than single-threaded sequence-based alignments. MicroDUET therefore provides a compact, reusable representation for scalable pathogen surveillance and sequence triage.

genomics↗

bioRxiv2026

A chromosome-level genome assembly of northern dragonhead, Dracocephalum ruyschiana L., 1753

We present a chromosome-level genome assembly for the vascular plant northern dragonhead, Dracocephalum ruyschiana. The assembly comprises two pseudo-haplotypes, hap1 and hap2, of 661 Mb and 681 Mb, with 93.6% and 92.5%, respectively, scaffolded into seven chromosomes each - in line with the known karyotype. Assembly quality was high, with conserved single-copy ortholog completeness scores of 97.9% and 97.8%, combined k-mer completeness of 98.1%, and 38,141 and 38,617 annotated protein-coding genes for hap1 and hap2, respectively. This assembly provides a high-quality genomic resource for future research and conservation of northern dragonhead, as well as the endangered northern dragonhead sap beetle, which depends on the plant for reproduction and whose genome assembly is described in a complementary genome note.

genomics↗

bioRxiv2026

Elucidating Bat SuperImmunity: Insights from the Bent-Wing Bat Genome Assembly and Multi-Omics Analysis

Bats have evolved a range of unique adaptations, including powered flight, echolocation, and exceptional longevity. They have also attracted considerable scientific attention, particularly since the COVID-19 pandemic, due to their association with a broad diversity of viruses and their potential role in zoonotic transmission and emerging infectious diseases. Despite hosting numerous viruses, bats often exhibit limited clinical manifestations of infection, suggesting the evolution of distinctive mechanisms of immune regulation and tolerance. Understanding the molecular basis of these mechanisms has become a major focus of current research, with genome-wide analyses providing important insights into the genetic adaptations underlying bat immunity. Nevertheless, the regulatory complexity of bat genomes, particularly the contribution of non-coding RNAs and post-transcriptional RNA editing, remains comparatively underexplored. Here, we present an integrated multi-omic framework for the common bent-wing bat (Miniopterus schreibersii), combining a contiguous chromosome-scale genome assembly with multi-tissue transcriptomic profiling, long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) identification and synteny analysis, endogenous viral elements (EVE) mapping, and same-individual RNA editomic analyses. This study provides a comprehensive resource for investigating genome organization, transcriptional regulation, evolutionary relationships, and post-transcriptional modifications in this species. In particular, it offers an opportunity to explore the potential contribution of non-coding regulatory elements and RNA editing to the molecular mechanisms underlying viral interactions and immune regulation in bats. Collectively, these resources provide a valuable foundation for advancing our understanding of bat genome evolution and the regulatory mechanisms potentially associated with their distinctive responses to viral infections.

genomics↗