bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2024.04.25.591120

The adhesion GPCR ADGRV1 controls glutamate homeostasis in hippocampal astrocytes supporting neuron development: First insights into to pathophysiology of ADGRV1-associated epilepsy

Abstract

ADGRV1 is the largest member of adhesion G protein-coupled receptor (aGPCR) family. In the cell, aGPCRs have dual roles in cell adhesion and signal transduction. Mutations in ADGRV1 have been linked not only to Usher syndrome (USH), which causes deaf-blindness, but recently also to various forms of epilepsy. While the USH defects are attributed to the loss of fiber links between membranes formed by the extracellular domain of ADGRV1, the pathomechanisms leading to epilepsy remain elusive to date. Here, we study the specific functions of ADGRV1 in astrocytes where it is highest expressed in the nervous system. Affinity proteomics showed the interaction of ADRGV1 with proteins enriched in astrocytes. Dysregulations of cellular processes important in astrocyte function were indicated by the different transcriptomes of patient-derived cells and Adgrv1-deficent mouse hippocampi compared to appropriate controls. Alteration in morphology and reduced numbers of astrocytes in the hippocampus of Adgrv1-deficent mice. Monitoring the glutamate uptake in colorimetric assay and by live cell imaging of a genetic glutamate reporter consistently showed that glutamate uptake from the extracellular environment is significantly reduced in Adgrv1-deficent astrocytes. Expression analyses of key enzymes of the glutamate-glutamine cycle in astrocytes and the glutamate metabolism indicated imbalanced glutamate homeostasis in Adgrv1-deficient astrocytes. Finally, we provide evidence that the supportive function of astrocytes in neuronal development also relies on ADGRV1 expression in astrocytes. Our data collectively provides first insights into the molecular pathophysiology underlying the development of epilepsy associated with mutations in ADGRV1. HighlightsO_LIADGRV1 deficiency reduces the number of astrocytes in CA1 and changes the morphology of astrocytes in the hippocampus. C_LIO_LIADGRV1 interacts with numerous proteins enriched in astrocytes. C_LIO_LIDifferential transcriptomes revealed differential expression of genes related to glutamate homeostasis and epilepsy in ADGRV1 deficient models. C_LIO_LIADGRV1 controls glutamate uptake and regulates homeostasis in astrocytes. C_LIO_LIADGRV1 in astrocytes is vital for neuron morphogenesis. C_LIO_LIFirst insights into the molecular pathophysiology underlying the development of epilepsy associated with mutations in ADGRV1. C_LI Graphical Abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=197 SRC="FIGDIR/small/591120v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (54K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1f1f749org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@a1ea01org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@a0be1org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@191f96a_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Gueler, B. E., Zorin, M., Linnert, J., Nagel-Wolfrum, K., Wolfrum, U.. 2024-04-28. The adhesion GPCR ADGRV1 controls glutamate homeostasis in hippocampal astrocytes supporting neuron development: First insights into to pathophysiology of ADGRV1-associated epilepsy. https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.04.25.591120

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Cell Types in Describing Neuronal Physiological Features

Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) captures detailed gene expression profiles at scale, while patch-clamp recordings measure intrinsic neuronal electrophysiological properties. Modeling the relations between these two modalities remains a challenge. Here, we compare how well electrophysiological features can be predicted by traditional transcriptomic cell type classification, representations derived from a foundational model (scGPT) pretrained on large-scale scRNA-seq datasets, ion channel-coding genes, and highly variable genes. Using paired transcriptomic and electrophysiological patch-sequencing data from 495 human neurons from neurosurgical tissue, we find that cluster-level cell type representations consistently outperform highly variable gene selection, ion channel gene selection, and context-enriched scGPT embeddings. Notably, performance varies across model architectures and initializations, and the best results are obtained by combining the outputs of separate cell type and scGPT-based models. Together, these findings suggest that traditional discrete cellular classification is highly effective in predicting physiological features. For maximum performance it can be complemented by pretrained transformer models.

neuroscience↗

A nonlinear inhibition pathway underlying cortical responses to tuned holographic optogenetic perturbations

Optogenetics enables causal manipulation of cortical activity. Perturbation responses can be counterintuitive due to network interactions, making theory essential for predicting them. Existing approaches often rely on linear approximations, which fail for many biologically relevant perturbations. Here we develop a nonlinear theory of responses to holographic perturbations in cell-type-specific recurrent networks with structured connectivity. We fit a nonlinear model to mouse V1 data, which shows cotuned-ensemble suppression: perturbing spatially clustered neurons with similar preferred orientations yields markedly stronger short-range suppression than perturbing untuned ensembles. We show that cotuned-ensemble suppression arises from a feature-tuned, nonlinear inhibition pathway implicating somatostatin-positive (SST) interneurons. The theory predicts that cotuned ensembles suppress parvalbumin-positive (PV) neurons but facilitate SST neurons, and links the degree of cotuned-ensemble suppression or facilitation to the variance of the SST response. This framework identifies mechanisms by which nonlinear inhibition sculpts cortical dynamics and establishes a predictive basis for targeted optogenetic interventions.

neuroscience↗

Proteomic signatures of APOE ε4 across human tissues and cell types in Alzheimers disease

The apolipoprotein E {varepsilon}4 (APOE {varepsilon}4) allele is the strongest genetic risk factor for late-onset Alzheimers disease (AD). However, the underlying molecular mechanisms remain unclear. This study included 1691 participants from the Religious Orders Study and Rush Memory and Aging Project (ROSMAP), 1226 participants from the Accelerating Medicines Partnership - Alzheimers Disease (AMP-AD) Diverse Cohorts Study, and 735 participants from the Alzheimers Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI). To characterise APOE {varepsilon}4 molecular effects, we analysed proteomic data from plasma, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived astrocytes and neurons, as well as transcriptomic and proteomic data from multiple brain regions. The association of APOE {varepsilon}4 with AD neuropathology was also examined. APOE {varepsilon}4 carriers shared a plasma proteomic signature enriched for immune processes, irrespective of AD diagnosis. A machine learning classifier trained on this signature discriminated APOE {varepsilon}4 carriers from non-carriers in an independent cohort using CSF proteomics. APOE {varepsilon}4 carriage was associated with higher Braak stages and Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimers Disease (CERAD) score. However, only limited APOE {varepsilon}4-associated transcriptomic and proteomic changes were observed in bulk brain tissue, with poor cross-layer concordance. Proteomic analyses of iPSC-derived astrocytes and neurons further revealed cell-type-specific APOE {varepsilon}4-associated changes. APOE {varepsilon}4 is associated with a consistent proteomic signature across plasma and CSF. Its molecular effects in the brain differ across cell types, brain regions and molecular layers. These findings support the need for cell-type-resolved multi-omic studies to elucidate how APOE {varepsilon}4 confers AD risk.

neuroscience↗