Modeling CSF circulation and the glymphatic system during infusion using subject specific intracranial pressures and brain geometries

Abstract

BackgroundInfusion testing is an established method for assessing CSF resistance in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH). To what extent the increased resistance is related to the glymphatic system is an open question. Here we introduce a computational model that includes the glymphatic system and enables us to determine the importance of 1) brain geometry, 2) intracranial pressure and 3) physiological parameters on the outcome of and response to an infusion test. MethodsWe implemented a seven-compartment multiple network porous medium model with subject specific geometries from MR images. The model consists of the arterial, capillary and venous blood vessels, their corresponding perivascular spaces, and the extracellular space (ECS). Both subject specific brain geometries and subject specific infusion tests were used in the modeling of both healthy adults and iNPH patients. Furthermore, we performed a systematic study of the effect of variations in model parameters. ResultsBoth the iNPH group and the control group reached a similar steady state solution when subject specific geometries under identical boundary conditions was used in simulation. The difference in terms of average fluid pressure and velocity between the iNPH and control groups, was found to be less than 6 % during all stages of infusion in all compartments. With subject specific boundary conditions, the largest computed difference was a 75 % greater fluid speed in the arterial perivascular space (PVS) in the iNPH group compared to the control group. Changes to material parameters changed fluid speeds by several orders of magnitude in some scenarios. A considerable amount of the CSF pass through the glymphatic pathway in our models during infusion, i.e., 28% and 38% in the healthy and iNPH patients, respectively. ConclusionsUsing computational models, we have found the relative importance of subject specific geometries to be less important than individual differences in terms of fluid pressure and flow rate during infusion. Model parameters such as permeabilities and inter-compartment transfer parameters are uncertain but important and have large impact on the simulation results. The computations predicts that a considerable amount of the infused volume pass through the brain either through the perivascular spaces or the extracellular space.