bioRxiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/bioRxiv

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2024.03.11.583276

Common cuckoo female host selection is not determined by host quality but can affect cuckoo nestling growth when parasitising Common redstarts

Abaurrea, T.·Moreras, A.·Tolvanen, J.·Thomson, R. L.·Thorogood, R.
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Common cuckoo (Cuculus canorus) females lay their eggs in the nests of other avian hosts, relying on parental care provided by parasitised hosts. Therefore, it would benefit cuckoo females to target high-quality individual hosts, able to provide optimal parental care. Attempts at testing cuckoo female host selection have so far shown mixed results. However, this might be because studies have rarely considered the host nests that are available in space and time during each cuckoo egg-laying event, as well as the implications of host choice on the cuckoo nestling growth. Here we combined long-term monitoring data with an experiment to test whether cuckoo females parasitising Common redstarts (Phoenicurus phoenicurus) target individual hosts to optimise their nestling[s] growth. Making use of data collected between 2013 and 2022 from 350+ nest boxes in Oulu (Finland), we first explored whether there is a range of available host nests for the cuckoo female to choose from. Second, we tested if hosts are targeted according to individual quality (using clutch size as a proxy). And third, we investigated the outcomes of cuckoo female host-selection on nestling growth (mass, tarsus length, and wing length) between 2014 and 2019. We conducted a cross-fostering experiment where we either left cuckoo eggs to hatch and be raised in the nest their mother originally chose for them or moved cuckoo eggs to non-parasitised nests. Additionally, we conducted an exploratory analysis to test the quality of the parents caring for the cross-fostered cuckoo nestlings. After accounting for how many host nests were available to the cuckoo female to choose from, we found that nests with bigger clutches were not more likely to be parasitised, and cross-fostering did not affect mass and tarsus length growth. However, both in the wing length growth and in our exploratory analysis of host parental care on cuckoo nestling growth we found that cuckoo nestlings that grew in the nest selected by their mothers, reached higher asymptotic growth at a slower rate. This suggests that while cuckoos may not choose redstart hosts based on their individual quality when parasitising common redstarts, cuckoo female host selection might improve cuckoo nestling growth and thus, have an adaptive significance.

Explore related subjects

animal behavior and cognitionPreprint

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Abaurrea, T., Moreras, A., Tolvanen, J., Thomson, R. L., Thorogood, R.. 2024-03-13. Common cuckoo female host selection is not determined by host quality but can affect cuckoo nestling growth when parasitising Common redstarts. https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.11.583276

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

bioRxiv2026

roostR: An R package to examine diel activity patterns from Motus radio telemetry data

1. Monitoring the diel activity patterns of free-living animals is a methodological challenge. Signal strength fluctuations from Very High Frequency (VHF) radio transmitters deployed within the Motus Wildlife Tracking System can be used as a proxy for activity. However, analytical tools to extract behavioral metrics that quantify activity patterns from these data are needed. 2. We developed roostR, an open-source R package that converts Motus detection data into quantitative behavioral metrics, including roost initiation and departure, roost duration, observation time, and restlessness. The package uses a sequential pipeline built around signal volatility and rolling medians to detect transitions between active and inactive states. Default parameter values were tuned using data from 55 dark-eyed juncos (Junco hyemalis) overwintering in southeastern Ohio. 3. We provide an example from a dark-eyed junco over a 58-day period. roostR estimated roost onset on 48 nights and departure on 56 mornings, with higher rolling median signal differences during the day than at night, consistent with a diurnal animal, and variable restlessness periods each night. We also used the package to estimate roost behavior of an American tree sparrow (Spizelloides arborea) over 43-nights. 4. roostR enables researchers to extract individual activity data from Motus datasets. Because all thresholds are user-adjustable, the pipeline is adaptable across species, tag specifications, and ecological contexts, enabling researchers to test hypotheses about how environmental factors influence diel activity patterns.

animal behavior and cognition↗
bioRxiv2026

Characterizing rhythmic wheel-turning behavioral patterns in cockroaches Rhyparobia maderae using machine learning

Organisms must adapt to environmental changes occurring across multiple time scales, with endogenous multiscale clocks coordinating physiology and behavior with recurring environmental rhythms, including the dominant 24-hour cycle and faster ultradian rhythms. The Madeira cockroach (Rhyparobia maderae) provides a suitable model for investigating such multiscale temporal organization. Here, locomotor activity was recorded in running-wheel experiments under constant darkness. While the endogenous circadian clock produces a clearly visible 24-hour rhythm, it remains unknown whether locomotor behavior also exhibits temporal patterns at additional time scales. These temporal patterns cannot be found by classical frequency analysis, as they are veiled by higher harmonics of the circadian rhythm which are in the same frequency range. Unsupervised machine learning methods such as K-Means clustering, self-organizing maps and Gaussian mixture are used in search for fast ultradian rhythms possibly linked to circadian cycles in locomotor activity. Prior to applying these methods, data metrics are defined which characterize bouts of activity (called activity impulses) compared to periods of reduced activity. A stochastic pattern was found in these activity metrics which characterizes the time distance between activity impulses. Across all approaches, a consistent ultradian rhythm of approximately one hour was identified in the timing of the activity maxima. This rhythm was mainly detected during the subjective night, suggesting circadian control, and appears to consist of two components with periods of approximately 40 minutes and 1.5 hours. The method proposed in this paper is applied to two cockroach groups with different levels of activity, and is generalizable to diverse datasets occurring in the form of a time series with a dominant rhythm.

animal behavior and cognition↗
bioRxiv2026

Social inequity aversion and fairness preference in polar bears

Decision-making is key to survival, with choices and behaviour typically shaped by evolutionary pressures to enhance fitness and minimize loss. Inequity aversion, the tendency to respond negatively to unequal reward distributions, is therefore unexpected, as acts of fairness may be costly to the individual in the short term. In social, cooperative species, however, fairness may enhance long-term benefits through stable social interactions. Inequity aversion is believed to promote cooperative social structures and has only been demonstrated in certain social species. Yet, solitary species have not been tested, and whether this behaviour depends on social cooperative structures is unknown. Examining solitary species could clarify whether inequity aversion reflects an adaptation to cooperation or a general cognitive capacity linked to social comparison and reward evaluation. We studied inequity aversion in polar bears (Ursus maritimus), a largely solitary species, using three complementary, non-invasive cognition tests on seven bears from two zoos in the Netherlands. (1) An impunity experiment assessing effort-based inequity, in which bears performed a standardized action to obtain food rewards. (2) A choice-based experiment testing active selection between equal and unequal reward distributions. (3) A no-task control experiment assessing responses to unequal reward distribution without effort. Under effort-based inequity, bears reduced task performance and increased task latency when a partner received a superior reward. Unequal reward distributions did not affect reward acceptance independent of effort. In the choice-based paradigm, bears preferentially selected equal reward distributions with a partner present. Although generalizability to wild populations is limited, these findings demonstrate behavioural aversion of social inequity in a non-cooperative species. Inequality aversion may therefore not be restricted to social, cooperative animals but instead reflect a broadly distributed cognitive mechanism that emerges under relevant social conditions. These findings challenge current theories and advance our understanding of the cognitive foundations of fairness-related behaviour in animals.

animal behavior and cognition↗