Comparative pollinator conservation potential of coffee agroforestry relative to coffee monoculture and tropical rainforest in the DR Congo

Depecker, J.; Vandelook, F.; Jordaens, K.; Dorchin, A.; Ntumba, B.; Broeckhoven, I.; Dhed'a, B.; Devriese, A.; Deckers, L.; Stoffelen, P.; Honnay, O.

doi:10.1101/2024.02.23.581744

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2024.02.23.581744

Comparative pollinator conservation potential of coffee agroforestry relative to coffee monoculture and tropical rainforest in the DR Congo

Depecker, J.·Vandelook, F.·Jordaens, K.·Dorchin, A.·Ntumba, B.·Broeckhoven, I.·Dhed'a, B.·Devriese, A.·Deckers, L.·Stoffelen, P.·Honnay, O.

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Animal-pollination is crucial in the reproduction of many crops grown in the tropics, including the self-incompatible Robusta coffee. Coffea canephora Pierre ex A. Froehner. is indigenous to the Congo basin where it is growing in the rainforest understorey yet providing very low yields. Cultivation therefore mainly occurs in either unshaded monocultures or in agroforestry systems. Here we surveyed the Diptera (true flies) and Hymenoptera (bees) communities that are putative coffee pollinating organisms in the Yangambi region in DR Congo, and we assessed the comparative benefits of coffee agroforestry and monocultures to the coffee pollinator community. To assess a base line value of pollinator conservation value of the agroforestry system, we also compared it with natural rainforest. Using white pan traps, we identified 9,597 specimens. Natural rainforest harboured a higher number of individuals, as well as a higher number of species than both agroforestry and coffee monoculture systems, with no differences between the latter two land-uses. The Simpson diversity and Pielous evenness on the other hand did not differ among land-uses. Furthermore, we observed different responses in species richness and diversity to land-use between Diptera and Hymenoptera. Our analyses of pollinator community composition showed a high dissimilarity between natural rainforest and the two cultivation systems, without significant differences between the latter land-uses. Specifically, the community composition of the agroforestry and coffee monoculture systems were totally different, rather than a subset of the community composition of the natural rainforest. Our study indicates that rehabilitation of agricultural land through intercropping fruit trees may not always enhance the pollinator community and that the studied agroforestry system falls short of matching the pollinator conservation potential found in natural rainforests. A more optimal selection of tree species intercropped with coffee may both enhance the conservation value of the agroforestry system and the provisioning of pollination services.

Explore related subjects

ecology Preprint

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Depecker, J., Vandelook, F., Jordaens, K., Dorchin, A., Ntumba, B., Broeckhoven, I., Dhed'a, B., Devriese, A., Deckers, L., Stoffelen, P., Honnay, O.. 2024-02-23. Comparative pollinator conservation potential of coffee agroforestry relative to coffee monoculture and tropical rainforest in the DR Congo. https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.23.581744

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

bioRxiv2026

Beyond Single-Metric Assessments: Uncovering Masked Butterfly Declines via Multi-Scalar Analysis in Central Alberta

1. This study analyzed 21 years (2000-2025) of butterfly count data from Central Alberta, integrated with intensive 5-year (2021-2025) high-resolution intra-seasonal sampling. 2. Long-term macro-scale analysis revealed a significant decline in Shannon Diversity, a change that remained obscured when relying solely on traditional metrics of species richness and evenness. 3. This diversity decline was primarily driven by the severe, long-term collapse of the native Common Ringlet (Coenonympha tullia). 4. Four other dominant species--Cabbage White (Pieris rapae), Clouded Sulphur (Colias eriphyle), European Skipper (Thymelicus lineola), and Common Wood Nymph (Cercyonis pegala)--maintained long-term population stability, though their abundances were significantly constrained by extreme winter minimum temperatures and rapid spring warming. 5. High-resolution intra-seasonal analysis (2021-2025) demonstrated that community indices and species-specific abundances were strongly limited by daily weather, particularly wind velocity and temperature. 6. These findings illustrate that while traditional metrics like richness and evenness are fundamental to community ecology, they provide incomplete insights when applied in isolation; they are most effective when utilized as part of a complementary, multi-scalar framework. 7. This study highlights the necessity of coupling multi-decadal historical datasets with high-frequency, fine-scale sampling to accurately identify the mechanisms of community turnover that simpler metrics may overlook. 8. The results underscore the critical importance of standardized citizen science monitoring in quantifying environmental impacts and establishing conservation priorities for terrestrial insect groups.

ecology↗

bioRxiv2026

From concentration to export: resource contrasts and bee traits shape pollinator spillover to crops

Floral plantings can either concentrate bees or export them to adjacent crops, yet the ecological conditions influencing these outcomes remain unclear. Here, we develop a mathematical model as proof of concept for our previous integrative hypothesis: concentrator and exporter outcomes can arise as alternative, context-dependent outcomes of the same underlying resource-selection process. Using bees as a model and focusing specifically on spillover from floral plantings to crops, we identified resource-specific thresholds separating concentration- and export-favoring conditions. Our model translates differences in relative patch attractiveness into context-dependent concentration and export outcomes and generates resource-specific, testable predictions about the conditions favoring pollinator movement into crops. In our simulations, the concentrator-exporter transition occurred at a lower flowering-intensity contrast than at pollen or nectar contrasts, which suggests that flowering intensity may provide an initial cue for bee movement, whereas nectar and pollen rewards refine or sustain bee responses once crops are perceived as attractive. Spillover thresholds differed among resource contrasts, whereas response steepness varied across bee-trait and community scenarios. Under the model's trait-sensitivity formulation, predicted spillover probability responded more strongly to flowering contrast for specialists than for generalists; colony size amplified this response, whereas bee richness dampened it. Together, these patterns show how flowering and resource contrasts interact with bee traits and community context to shape predicted spillover. Our results confirm that the concentrator and exporter hypotheses can be understood as context-dependent outcomes of the same ecological process rather than as mutually exclusive alternatives. Experimental tests of the predicted thresholds conducted in the field could reveal when and where floral plantings are most likely to promote bee spillover to crops, potentially supporting crop pollination.

ecology↗

bioRxiv2026

A Computational Re-evaluation of Spatial Trials for Zoonotic Tuberculosis Control: Model Misspecification, Diagnostic Miss-classification, and the Illusion of Wildlife Culling Efficacy

1. Wildlife reservoir management frequently relies on the Randomised Badger Culling Trial's (RBCT) trade-off hypothesis, which posits that reductions in cattle herd infections are offset by a perturbation effect driven by disrupted host dispersal. This paper evaluates the computational and epidemiological robustness of this historical trial, which serves as the foundational empirical experiment guiding zoonotic tuberculosis (Mycobacterium bovis) control policies. 2. Using generalized linear mixed models with a generalized Poisson error distribution to explicitly address historical data overdispersion, this study contrasts traditional parametric inference against exact cluster-constrained permutation tests across distinct operational definitions of disease incidence. 3. Non-parametric diagnostics reveal that previously reported treatment and perturbation effects render as statistical artifacts under exact non-parametric permutation. Inside culling zones, parametric significance fails to withstand exact permutation verification due to extreme data leverage in localized cluster blocks. 4. Crucially, when diagnostic misclassification biases are eliminated by analysing total reactor datasets, all apparent culling effects disappear, and information criteria overwhelmingly favour nested null architectures. Unconfirmed reactors likely represent true biological infections missed by low-sensitivity post-mortem macro-necropsy, proving that host removal tracks observation noise rather than genuine zoonotic transmission pathways. 5. Finally, empirical scaling conducted in this study identifies a novel mathematical saturation effect, demonstrating that this sub-linear scaling is an operational artifact of unmodelled herd-level disease recurrence over time. 6. Policy implications. Because current zoonotic tuberculosis intervention frameworks are built upon a structurally misspecified statistical model, they have driven large-scale veterinary policies resulting in substantial, unevidenced ecological and economic interventions while failing to provide genuine public health, animal health, or disease control benefits.

ecology↗