bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2024.02.16.580671

Impact of a national tsetse control programme to eliminate Gambian sleeping sickness in Uganda: a spatio-temporal modelling study.

Abstract

IntroductionTsetse flies (Glossina) transmit Trypanosoma brucei gambiense which causes gambiense human African trypanosomiasis (gHAT). As part of national efforts to eliminate gHAT as a public health problem, Uganda implemented a large-scale programme of deploying Tiny Targets, which comprise panels of insecticide-treated material which attract and kill tsetse. At its peak, the programme was the largest tsetse control operation in Africa. Here, we quantify the impact of Tiny Targets and environmental changes on the spatial and temporal patterns of tsetse abundance across north-western Uganda. MethodsWe leverage a 100-month longitudinal dataset detailing Glossina fuscipes fuscipes catches from monitoring traps between October 2010 and December 2019 within seven districts in north-western Uganda. We fitted a boosted regression tree model assessing environmental suitability which was used alongside Tiny Target data to fit a spatio-temporal geostatistical model predicting tsetse abundance across our study area ([~]16,000 km2). We used the spatio-temporal model to quantify the impact of Tiny Targets and environmental changes on the distribution of tsetse, alongside metrics of uncertainty. ResultsEnvironmental suitability across the study area remained relatively constant over time, with suitability being driven largely by elevation and distance to rivers. By performing a counterfactual analysis using the fitted spatio-temporal geostatistical model we show that deployment of Tiny Targets across an area of 4000 km2 reduced the overall abundance of tsetse to low levels (median daily catch = 1.1 tsetse/trap, IQR = 0.85-1.28) with no spatial-temporal locations having high (>10 tsetse/trap/day) numbers of tsetse compared to 18% of locations for the counterfactual. ConclusionsIn Uganda, Tiny Targets reduced the abundance of G. f. fuscipes and maintained tsetse populations at low levels. Our model represents the first spatio-temporal model investigating the effects of a national tsetse control programme. The outputs provide important data for informing next steps for vector-control and surveillance. Key questionsO_ST_ABSWhat is already known on this topic?C_ST_ABSSmall panels of insecticide-treated fabric, called Tiny Targets, are used to attract, and kill riverine tsetse, the vectors of T. b. gambiense which causes gambiense human African trypanosomiasis (gHAT). In large-scale (250-2000 km2) trials conducted in five countries, deployment of Tiny Targets reduced the densities of tsetse by between 60 and >90%. What this study addsWe report an analysis of, and data from, a large-scale ([~]4,000km2) national tsetse control programme, implemented in Uganda to eliminate gHAT as a public health problem. We found that Tiny Targets reduced tsetse abundance across the study period (2011-2019) and maintained densities at low (<1 tsetse/trap/day) levels. We produce maps which detail spatial variances in tsetse abundance in response to vector control. How this study might affect research, practice, or policyIn 2022, Uganda received validation from the World Health Organisation (WHO) that it had eliminated gHAT as a public health problem. The large-scale deployment of Tiny Targets contributed to this achievement. Our findings provide evidence that Tiny Targets are an important intervention for other countries aiming to eliminate gHAT.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Longbottom, J., Esterhuizen, J., Hope, A., Lehane, M. J., Mangwiro, C. T., Mugenyi, A., Dunkley, S., Selby, R., Tirados, I., Torr, S. J., Stanton, M. C.. 2024-02-21. Impact of a national tsetse control programme to eliminate Gambian sleeping sickness in Uganda: a spatio-temporal modelling study.. https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.16.580671

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Beyond Single-Metric Assessments: Uncovering Masked Butterfly Declines via Multi-Scalar Analysis in Central Alberta

1. This study analyzed 21 years (2000-2025) of butterfly count data from Central Alberta, integrated with intensive 5-year (2021-2025) high-resolution intra-seasonal sampling. 2. Long-term macro-scale analysis revealed a significant decline in Shannon Diversity, a change that remained obscured when relying solely on traditional metrics of species richness and evenness. 3. This diversity decline was primarily driven by the severe, long-term collapse of the native Common Ringlet (Coenonympha tullia). 4. Four other dominant species--Cabbage White (Pieris rapae), Clouded Sulphur (Colias eriphyle), European Skipper (Thymelicus lineola), and Common Wood Nymph (Cercyonis pegala)--maintained long-term population stability, though their abundances were significantly constrained by extreme winter minimum temperatures and rapid spring warming. 5. High-resolution intra-seasonal analysis (2021-2025) demonstrated that community indices and species-specific abundances were strongly limited by daily weather, particularly wind velocity and temperature. 6. These findings illustrate that while traditional metrics like richness and evenness are fundamental to community ecology, they provide incomplete insights when applied in isolation; they are most effective when utilized as part of a complementary, multi-scalar framework. 7. This study highlights the necessity of coupling multi-decadal historical datasets with high-frequency, fine-scale sampling to accurately identify the mechanisms of community turnover that simpler metrics may overlook. 8. The results underscore the critical importance of standardized citizen science monitoring in quantifying environmental impacts and establishing conservation priorities for terrestrial insect groups.

ecology↗

From concentration to export: resource contrasts and bee traits shape pollinator spillover to crops

Floral plantings can either concentrate bees or export them to adjacent crops, yet the ecological conditions influencing these outcomes remain unclear. Here, we develop a mathematical model as proof of concept for our previous integrative hypothesis: concentrator and exporter outcomes can arise as alternative, context-dependent outcomes of the same underlying resource-selection process. Using bees as a model and focusing specifically on spillover from floral plantings to crops, we identified resource-specific thresholds separating concentration- and export-favoring conditions. Our model translates differences in relative patch attractiveness into context-dependent concentration and export outcomes and generates resource-specific, testable predictions about the conditions favoring pollinator movement into crops. In our simulations, the concentrator-exporter transition occurred at a lower flowering-intensity contrast than at pollen or nectar contrasts, which suggests that flowering intensity may provide an initial cue for bee movement, whereas nectar and pollen rewards refine or sustain bee responses once crops are perceived as attractive. Spillover thresholds differed among resource contrasts, whereas response steepness varied across bee-trait and community scenarios. Under the model's trait-sensitivity formulation, predicted spillover probability responded more strongly to flowering contrast for specialists than for generalists; colony size amplified this response, whereas bee richness dampened it. Together, these patterns show how flowering and resource contrasts interact with bee traits and community context to shape predicted spillover. Our results confirm that the concentrator and exporter hypotheses can be understood as context-dependent outcomes of the same ecological process rather than as mutually exclusive alternatives. Experimental tests of the predicted thresholds conducted in the field could reveal when and where floral plantings are most likely to promote bee spillover to crops, potentially supporting crop pollination.

ecology↗

A Computational Re-evaluation of Spatial Trials for Zoonotic Tuberculosis Control: Model Misspecification, Diagnostic Miss-classification, and the Illusion of Wildlife Culling Efficacy

1. Wildlife reservoir management frequently relies on the Randomised Badger Culling Trial's (RBCT) trade-off hypothesis, which posits that reductions in cattle herd infections are offset by a perturbation effect driven by disrupted host dispersal. This paper evaluates the computational and epidemiological robustness of this historical trial, which serves as the foundational empirical experiment guiding zoonotic tuberculosis (Mycobacterium bovis) control policies. 2. Using generalized linear mixed models with a generalized Poisson error distribution to explicitly address historical data overdispersion, this study contrasts traditional parametric inference against exact cluster-constrained permutation tests across distinct operational definitions of disease incidence. 3. Non-parametric diagnostics reveal that previously reported treatment and perturbation effects render as statistical artifacts under exact non-parametric permutation. Inside culling zones, parametric significance fails to withstand exact permutation verification due to extreme data leverage in localized cluster blocks. 4. Crucially, when diagnostic misclassification biases are eliminated by analysing total reactor datasets, all apparent culling effects disappear, and information criteria overwhelmingly favour nested null architectures. Unconfirmed reactors likely represent true biological infections missed by low-sensitivity post-mortem macro-necropsy, proving that host removal tracks observation noise rather than genuine zoonotic transmission pathways. 5. Finally, empirical scaling conducted in this study identifies a novel mathematical saturation effect, demonstrating that this sub-linear scaling is an operational artifact of unmodelled herd-level disease recurrence over time. 6. Policy implications. Because current zoonotic tuberculosis intervention frameworks are built upon a structurally misspecified statistical model, they have driven large-scale veterinary policies resulting in substantial, unevidenced ecological and economic interventions while failing to provide genuine public health, animal health, or disease control benefits.

ecology↗