Pharmacological manipulations of the dorsomedial and dorsolateral striatum during fear extinction have opposing effects on fear renewal

Greenwood, B. N.; Tanner, M. K.; Hohorst, A. A.; Westerman, J.; Sanchez Mendoza, C.; Han, R.; Moya, N. A.; Jaime, J.; Alvarez, L. M.; Balolia, A.; Abdul, R.; Loetz, E. C.; Dryden, M.

doi:10.1101/2024.01.17.576042

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2024.01.17.576042

Pharmacological manipulations of the dorsomedial and dorsolateral striatum during fear extinction have opposing effects on fear renewal

Greenwood, B. N.·Tanner, M. K.·Hohorst, A. A.·Westerman, J.·Sanchez Mendoza, C.·Han, R.·Moya, N. A.·Jaime, J.·Alvarez, L. M.·Balolia, A.·Abdul, R.·Loetz, E. C.·Dryden, M.

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Systemic manipulations that enhance dopamine (DA) transmission around the time of fear extinction can strengthen fear extinction and reduce conditioned fear relapse. Prior studies investigating the brain regions where DA augments fear extinction focus on targets of mesolimbic and mesocortical DA systems originating in the ventral tegmental area, given the role of these DA neurons in prediction error. The dorsal striatum (DS), a primary target of the nigrostriatal DA system originating in the substantia nigra (SN), is implicated in behaviors beyond its canonical role in movement, such as reward and punishment, goal-directed action, and stimulus-response associations, but whether DS DA contributes to fear extinction is unknown. We have observed that chemogenetic stimulation of SN DA neurons during fear extinction prevents the return of fear in contexts different from the extinction context, a form of relapse called renewal. This effect of SN DA stimulation is mimicked by a DA D1 receptor (D1R) agonist injected into the DS, thus implicating DS DA in fear extinction. Different DS subregions subserve unique functions of the DS, but it is unclear where in the DS D1R agonist acts during fear extinction to reduce renewal. Furthermore, although fear extinction increases neural activity in DS subregions, whether neural activity in DS subregions is causally involved in fear extinction is unknown. To explore the role of DS subregions in fear extinction, adult, male Long-Evans rats received microinjections of either the D1R agonist SKF38393 or a cocktail consisting of GABAA/GABAB receptor agonists muscimol/baclofen selectively into either dorsomedial (DMS) or dorsolateral (DLS) DS subregions immediately prior to fear extinction, and extinction retention and renewal were subsequently assessed drug-free. While increasing D1R signaling in the DMS during fear extinction did not impact fear extinction retention or renewal, DMS inactivation reduced later renewal. In contrast, DLS inactivation had no effect on fear extinction retention or renewal but increasing D1R signaling in the DLS during extinction reduced fear renewal. These data suggest that DMS and DLS activity during fear extinction can have opposing effects on later fear renewal, with the DMS promoting renewal and the DLS opposing renewal. Mechanisms through which the DS could influence the contextual gating of fear extinction are discussed. HighlightsO_LIDorsolateral striatum D1 receptor signaling during fear extinction reduces renewal C_LIO_LINeural activity in the dorsomedial striatum during fear extinction permits renewal C_LIO_LIDorsal striatum subregions have opposing roles in contextual gating of fear extinction C_LI Graphical Abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=51 SRC="FIGDIR/small/576042v2_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (8K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@6d935org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@19e51acorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@103fa30org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1e7017_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Explore related subjects

neuroscience Preprint

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Greenwood, B. N., Tanner, M. K., Hohorst, A. A., Westerman, J., Sanchez Mendoza, C., Han, R., Moya, N. A., Jaime, J., Alvarez, L. M., Balolia, A., Abdul, R., Loetz, E. C., Dryden, M.. 2024-01-20. Pharmacological manipulations of the dorsomedial and dorsolateral striatum during fear extinction have opposing effects on fear renewal. https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.17.576042

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

bioRxiv2026

A systems-level model of sleep-dependent memory-consolidation failure in neurodegeneration: the spindle-slow-oscillation decoupling cascade dissociates amyloid and tau

During non-rapid-eye-movement (NREM) sleep, the temporal coupling of cortical slow oscillations (SOs), thalamic spindles, and hippocampal sharp wave ripples drives the consolidation of declarative memories. This coupling degrades in ageing and Alzheimers disease (AD), and although A{beta} and tau leave dissociable signatures in human sleep, the mechanisms by which progressive pathology dismantles the consolidation machinery are difficult to isolate experimentally, and have not to our knowledge been reproduced in a model that can be perturbed directly. We built a systems-level model in which cortical SOs and thalamic spindles are generated by reduced oscillators, hippocampal ripples replay encoded spike sequences, and the measured per-event SO-spindle timing alignment causally gates spike-timing dependent plasticity on cortical sequence synapses. A post-sleep cued-recall test reads out consolidation. Five neurodegeneration parameters (amyloid, tau, synaptic density, GABAergic inhibition, cholinergic tone) map to dis tinct mechanisms grounded in the human and animal literature. The model reproduces graded healthy consolidation and a progressive collapse in which coupling, slow-wave power, spindle power and recall fall monotonically and the overnight memory effect flips from consolidation to net forgetting, with weak memories failing first. Scrambling SO-spindle timing while holding oscillation power fixed abolishes consolidation, establishing that coupling timing, rather than oscillation power, is what the plasticity gate depends on within the model. A{beta} and tau impair memory through orthogonal signatures (A{beta} collapses slow-wave power while sparing replay order, tau the reverse) and this orthogonality holds across the entire A{beta} x tau plane and survives simultaneous {+/-}50% resampling of every mapping coefficient (40/40 samples), so it is not an artefact of a single calibration point. The model yields a falsifiable clinical prediction: closed-loop slow-oscillation enhancement rescues memory only when the deficit is amplitude/coupling-dominated, not when it is replay(tau)-dominated, despite normalising slow-wave power in both cases. Because the therapy arms dissociate coupling from memory benefit, the model also cautions against adopting SO-spindle coupling as a standalone surrogate endpoint.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2026

Toxicity of MAPT 4R RNA Contributes to Motor Neuron Degeneration in ALS

MAPT (Tau) dysregulation is implicated in several neurodegenerative diseases, but its contribution to amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is poorly understood. Here we show that mRNA isoforms encoding 4-repeat (4R) Tau are upregulated and cytoplasmically enriched in iPSC-derived motor neurons (MNs) from VCP-mutant and sporadic ALS, without a corresponding change in Tau protein. Using splice-switching antisense oligonucleotides and isoform-specific siRNAs, we find that enhanced 4R expression reduces MN viability, whereas its selective knockdown improves survival, with kinetics more consistent with an RNA-intrinsic effect than altered protein synthesis. Exon 10-containing MAPT RNA shows increased predicted secondary structure, self-association and altered Tau biocondensation in vitro. In post-mortem ALS cervical spinal cord, increased relative exon 10 usage is associated with a higher-risk clinical phenotype and shorter disease duration These findings identify an isoform-specific contribution of MAPT to MN vulnerability in ALS and nominate 4R MAPT RNA as a therapeutic target.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2026

State dependant modulation of optic flow-processing lobula plate cells in butterflies

Increasing experimental evidence suggests that biological systems cancel predictable components of sensory signals while maintaining sensitivity to externally induced state changes. This strategy provides task-specific sensor responses for posture, locomotion, and gaze control. A prime example is found in interneurons that respond to visual image shifts resulting from the relative motion between an animal's eyes and its visual surroundings. Such optic flow-processing interneurons, found across phyla and are particularly well characterized in Dipteran and other flying insects. We studied optic flow-processing interneurons in the Monarch butterfly whose large and highly contrasted wings sweep through the visual field with every wing-beat cycle, potentially obscuring interneuron output signals. Our results show baseline spiking activity increases when animals flap their wings, and individual spikes are phase-locked to the wing-beat cycle, even in the dark, when no visual motion input is available. A qualitative estimate of the interneurons' response to directional wing motion through its receptive field is not sufficient to explain the recorded activity patterns. Our results suggest that an additional internal signal suppresses responses to wing-induced visual motion to support effective vision-based stabilization reflexes. These findings support the principle that self-generated signals are suppressed while sensitivity to external modulation is preserved.

neuroscience↗