bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2023.12.20.572572

What doesn't kill you makes you stronger? Effects of paternal age at conception on fathers and sons

Abstract

Advancing male age is often hypothesised to reduce both male fertility and offspring quality through reproductive senescence. However, the effects of advancing male age on reproductive output and offspring quality need not always be deleterious. For example, older fathers might compensate for reproductive senescence by terminally investing in reproduction. Similarly, males that survive to reproduce at an old age, might carry alleles that confer high viability (viability selection) which are then inherited by offspring, or might have high reproductive potential (selective disappearance). Differentiating these mechanisms requires an integrated experimental study of paternal survival and reproductive performance, as well as offspring quality, which is currently lacking. Using Drosophila melanogaster, we test the effects of paternal age at conception (PAC) on paternal survival and reproductive success, and the lifespans of sons. We discover that mating at an old age is temporarily linked with decreased future male survival, suggesting that mating-induced mortality is possibly due to old fathers being frail. We also find a quadratic reproductive ageing pattern, with an onset of senescence in late-life. We discover no evidence for terminal investment, and instead discover positive covariances between a fathers lifespan and his probability of siring offspring, for older PAC groups. Lastly, we show that sons born to older fathers live longer than those born to younger fathers, due to viability selection. Collectively, our results suggest that effects of advancing PAC need not be deleterious for fathers or offspring, and can increase fitness if older fathers produce more viable offspring. Lay summaryIts often assumed that old fathers have fewer or lower-quality offspring than young fathers. However, old fathers have on average, usually survived to and reproduced at an older age than young fathers, which might be signals of high quality of old fathers, and benefit offspring. These opposing predictions have rarely been tested, and its unclear what their combined influence is, in determining the fathers and offsprings fitness. Using fruit flies, we explored how old paternal age affects a fathers reproduction and his sons lifespans. We find evidence for age-related reproductive decline in fathers. However, we also discover that fathers who mate at an older age live longer than fathers who mate at a younger age, and subsequently, the sons of older fathers live longer than sons of younger fathers. We suggest that the relationship between paternal age, paternal reproduction and lifespan, and offspring quality, is more complex than previously assumed, and that old fathers might provide benefits to their offspring that future studies need to consider. Teaser textIs an old dad really that bad? While old fathers might in some cases produce fewer offspring or offspring of worse quality than young fathers, they have also survived to an older age, thus might be of higher quality. We test how reproducing at an old age affects a father and his sons fitness. We show that old fathers show evidence of reproductive senescence, but, surprisingly, produce sons that are longer lived than the sons of young fathers. This effect is driven largely by old fathers themselves living longer than young fathers, thus possibly passing alleles conferring higher viability to their sons. Our research is important because it reveals specific mechanisms that drive multifaceted effects of age on fitness.

Source connections

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Sanghvi, K., Pizzari, T., Sepil, I.. 2023-12-21. What doesn't kill you makes you stronger? Effects of paternal age at conception on fathers and sons. https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.12.20.572572

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Geometry of antigenic evolution improves influenza vaccine selection

Anticipating antigenic evolution is essential for selecting effective seasonal influenza A/H3N2 vaccine strains. To this end, we integrated hemagglutination-inhibition and neutralization titers spanning 2002 to 2025 into a unified Bayesian antigenic map. The map resolves twelve antigenic clusters advancing in discrete steps, with several clusters co-circulating in most seasons. In 15 of 21 seasons, the WHO-recommended vaccine belonged to an earlier cluster than the dominant circulating cluster. The direction of each vaccine update relative to recent viral drift predicted vaccine effectiveness one season ahead in out-of-sample forecasts. Antigenic distance, the conventional measure of vaccine-virus match, was weakly associated with effectiveness until update direction was accounted for. Retrospectively ranking candidate strains by predicted effectiveness would have selected a strain predicted to outperform the WHO recommendation in every season, raising mean predicted effectiveness by 10 percentage points.

evolutionary biology↗

Evolutionary replay of duplicate-gene retention across independent whole-genome duplications

Whole-genome duplications repeatedly expose ancestral gene lineages to the same broad evolutionary outcome-retention or loss of duplicated copies-but it remains unclear whether this history replays similarly across evolutionary scales. We placed duplicate retention in shared hierarchical orthologous-group coordinates and compared percentile ranks defined within each event-wide mapped universe. Three independent angiosperm whole-genome duplications showed reproducible replay (global rank effect T-replay = 0.210, bootstrap 95% confidence interval 0.172-0.248; permutation P = 1/100,001). A plant reference-panel score specified before target outcomes were examined predicted retention after the Apple/Pear duplication ({rho} = 0.169, n = 373). Deep transfer was heterogeneous: the teleost-genome-duplication estimate was positive but unresolved ({rho} = 0.107, n = 151, 95% confidence interval -0.050 to 0.260), whereas transfer to the ancient budding-yeast whole-genome duplication (yeast WGD) was supported ({rho} = 0.280, n = 186). Independently reconstructed animal outcomes also replayed between teleost and Stylommatophora duplications (r = 0.226, n = 146, P = 0.00326), although the effect remained below a prespecified strong-effect threshold. A strict plant-animal comparison was limited to 25 deeply one-to-one lineages and was unresolved (r = 0.033, 95% confidence interval -0.303 to 0.340). Thus, ancestral gene-lineage identity contributes reproducibly to duplicate retention after independent whole-genome duplications, but replay is structured by evolutionary lineage and modified by event-specific history rather than governed by one universal gene-fate ranking.

evolutionary biology↗

A Hymenoptera-restricted gene mediating ant castes co-opts deeply conserved machinery to control organ size

Lineage-specific genes are widespread and have been implicated as phenotypic innovation inducers, but how they acquire complex developmental functions remains poorly understood. Ant queens and workers develop dramatically different organ sizes from identical genomes under juvenile hormone (JH) control, yet the molecular effectors translating JH signalling into caste-specific organ growth remain unknown. Here we identify torch, a Hymenoptera-restricted gene, as the most consistently gyne-biased and JH-responsive gene across 68 ant species. Knockdown of torch in virgin queens of Monomorium pharaonis produces a worker-like, multi-organ growth-restricted phenotype. Mechanistically, torch harbours an E-box-like motif activated by the JH receptor Gce-Tai and acts as a GA-repeat-binding transcription factor that regulates Hippo signalling, the deeply conserved organ-size control pathway in animals. Expressing torch heterologously in mice and a growth-restricted Drosophila background shows that the gene retained its general growth-promoting activity across more than 700 million years of animal evolution in lineages that lack the gene, establishing that its function is mediated through conserved rather than ant-specific machinery. A lineage-specific gene can therefore acquire complex morphogenetic function by co-opting ancient organ-size circuitry, providing a general route by which novel genes can drive phenotypic innovation.

evolutionary biology↗