bioRxiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/bioRxiv

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2023.12.19.572320

Testicular mosaicism in non-mosaic postpubertal Klinefelter patients with focal spermatogenesis and in non-mosaic prepubertal Klinefelter boys

Gul, S.·Vloeberghs, V.·Gies, I.·Goossens, E.
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The aim of the study is to investigate testicular mosaicism in non-mosaic postpubertal Klinefelter Syndrome patients and in non-mosaic prepubertal Klinefelter boys Testes of the males with non-mosaic Klinefelter Syndrome at different developmental stages were used. Immunohistochemical and fluorescent in situ hybridization analyses were applied for X chromosome ploidy in testis-specific cells in testicular biopsy samples from non-mosaic Klinefelter Syndrome patients. According to our findings, all analyzed spermatogonia in both postpubertal and prepubertal non-mosaic Klinefelter Syndrome patients have a 46,XY karyotype. However, while the Sertoli cells surrounding spermatogonia in postpubertal samples also have a 46,XY karyotype, the Sertoli cells surrounding spermatogonia in prepubertal samples have a 47,XXY karyotype. Peritubular myoid cells and Leydig cells may also have mosaicism in both postpubertal patients and prepubertal boys. In conclusion, we confirmed in situ using cell-specific markers that testicular mosaicism exists in non-mosaic Klinefelter Syndrome patients. Therefore, we hypothesize that focal spermatogenesis seen in some postpubertal Klinefelter Syndrome patients originates from euploid spermatogonia and Sertoli cells. Additionally, our findings suggest that only spermatogonia that have lost their X chromosome can survive. Furthermore, our data suggest that spermatogonia lose the extra X chromosome during fetal or neonatal life, while Sertoli cells lose it around puberty. These findings will lay the groundwork for new studies on exactly when and by which mechanism an extra X chromosome is lost in spermatogonia and Sertoli cells.

Source connections

Explore related subjects

geneticsPreprint

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Gul, S., Vloeberghs, V., Gies, I., Goossens, E.. 2023-12-20. Testicular mosaicism in non-mosaic postpubertal Klinefelter patients with focal spermatogenesis and in non-mosaic prepubertal Klinefelter boys. https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.12.19.572320

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

bioRxiv2026

Generation of a transgenic cephalopod

Coleoid cephalopods (cuttlefish, octopus, and squid) are marine mollusks with elaborate nervous systems that support a diverse repertoire of complex behaviors. These include the neural control of the color, pattern, and texture of the skin, facilitating both adaptive camouflage and innate patterning that may reflect internal state. The development of transgenic cephalopods expressing fluorescent proteins, optogenetic actuators, and reporters of neural activity would contribute a new and important technology to cephalopod biology. The generation of transgenic cephalopods, however, has remained a major challenge. Here, we report the development of stable transgenic dwarf cuttlefish (Ascarosepion bandense) expressing ubiquitous nuclear-localized mScarlet, a red fluorescent protein. We evaluated multiple strategies for transgenesis, and established cuttlefish lines using both CRISPR and the transposons Sleeping Beauty and Minos. The stable expression of transgenes enabled live imaging of cell dynamics during embryonic development. The Minos transposon emerged as the most efficient transgenesis strategy and is adaptable to promoters and transgenes of choice. These strategies now enable the generation of diverse genetic tools for mechanistic studies of cephalopod biology.

genetics↗
bioRxiv2026

Large language model-based bibliometric evaluation of population descriptors in human genetics

As the use of population descriptors such as race, ethnicity, and ancestry have become increasingly common in modern genetics research, there have been growing calls to critically examine their use. Most notably, in 2023, the National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM) published a report titled Using Population Descriptors in Genetics and Genomics Research: A New Framework for an Evolving Field, which included eight specific and actionable recommendations for researchers to implement the ethical and accurate use of population descriptors in genetic research. Here, we use the 2023 NASEM report as a benchmark to analyze the use of population descriptors in genome-wide association studies (GWAS). We develop a general toolkit for large language model-based bibliometrics, operationalize the report's recommendations into an evaluation framework, and apply this framework to evaluate all 4,007 papers from the GWAS Catalog published between 2007 and 2025 with full text available on PubMedCentral. We find significant improvements in adherence to NASEM report recommendations over time. However, most improvements predate the publication of the NASEM report itself, suggesting the report functioned primarily as a synthesis of existing best practices rather than a catalyst for change. We conclude by highlighting opportunities for growth in the field of human genetics.

genetics↗
bioRxiv2026

Mitigating biases of rescaling in forward-in-time population genetic simulations

Forward-in-time population genetic simulations are widely used in evolutionary analyses, but simulating large populations and long genomic regions remains computationally demanding. To reduce this cost, parameter rescaling is widely employed, in which the original evolutionary process is approximated by one with a smaller population size and fewer generations. Recently, several studies using the SLiM simulator have raised concerns about the accuracy of this rescaling approach. In this study, we show that many of the biases reported in these studies can be mitigated by using a different simulation algorithm. These results reveal that the accuracy of parameter rescaling depends on how well the simulation algorithm preserves diffusion-limit properties under rescaling.

genetics↗