Cortical responses to looming sources are explained away by the auditory periphery

Abstract

A wealth of behavioral evidence indicate that sounds with increasing intensity (i.e. appear to be looming towards the listener) are processed with increased attentional and physiological resources compared to receding sounds. However, the neurophysiological mechanism responsible for such cognitive amplification remains elusive. Here, we show that the large differences seen between cortical responses to looming and receding sounds are in fact almost entirely explained away by nonlinear encoding at the level of the auditory periphery. We collected EEG mismatch negativity (MMN) data in response to deviant stimuli with both dynamic (looming and receding) and constant level (flat) differences to the standard in the same participants. We then combined a computational model of the auditory periphery with generative EEG methods (temporal response functions, TRFs) to model the single-participant MMN responses to flat deviants, and used them to predict the effect of the same mechanism on looming and receding stimuli. The flat model explained a remarkable 45% variance of the looming response, and 33% of the receding response. This provide striking evidence that MMN responses to looming and receding sounds result from the same cortical mechanism that generate MMN to constant-level deviants: all such differences are the sole consequence of their particular physical morphology getting amplified and integrated by peripheral auditory mechanisms. Thus, not all effects seen cortically proceed from top-down modulations by high-level decision variables, but can rather be performed early and efficiently by feed-forward peripheral mechanisms that evolved precisely to sparing subsequent networks with the necessity to implement such mechanisms.