bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2023.11.29.569194

Aurora Kinase A Inhibition plus Tumor Treating Fields Suppress Glioma Cell Proliferation in a Cilium-Independent Manner

Abstract

Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) have been shown to extend the survival of glioblastoma (GBM) patients. TTFields interfere with a broad range of cellular processes which may contribute to their efficacy. Among these, TTFields disrupt primary cilia stability on GBM cells. Here we asked if concomitant treatment of TTFields with other agents that interfere with GBM ciliogenesis can further suppress GBM cell proliferation in vitro. Aurora Kinase A (AURKA) promotes both cilia disassembly and GBM growth in vitro and in xenograft models. Inhibitors of AURKA such as Alisertib have been previously demonstrated to inhibit cilia disassembly and increase the frequency of cilia in various cell types. However, here we show that physiological concentrations of Alisertib treatment significantly reduced GBM cilia frequency in gliomaspheres across multiple patient derived cell lines, and in patient biopsies treated ex vivo with Alisertib. This activity of Alisertib seems to be glioma cell specific as it did not reduce neuronal or glial cilia frequencies in mixed primary cell cultures from mouse forebrain. Furthermore, Alisertib depletion of glioma cilia appears specific to AURKA inhibition, as a potent AURKB inhibitor, AZD1152, had no effect on GBM ciliary frequency. Treatment of two different GBM patient-derived cell lines with TTFields and Alisertib resulted in a significant reduction in cell proliferation compared to either treatment alone. However, this effect was not cilia-dependent as the combined treatment reduced proliferation in cilia-depleted cell lines lacking, ARL13b, or U87MG cells which are naturally devoid of ARL13B+ cilia. This result is not surprising given the wide range of pathways regulated by AURKA in addition to cilia. Nonetheless, Alisertib-mediated effects on glioma cilia may be a useful biomarker of drug efficacy within tumor tissue. Considering Alisertib has been shown to cross the blood brain barrier and inhibit intracranial growth of xenografted tumor models, our data warrant future studies to explore whether concomitant Alisertib and TTFields exposure prolongs survival of brain tumor-bearing animals in vivo.

Source connections

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Tian, J., Mallinger, J., Shi, P., Ling, D., Deleyrolle, L. P., Lin, M., Khoshbouei, H., Sarkisian, M.. 2023-11-30. Aurora Kinase A Inhibition plus Tumor Treating Fields Suppress Glioma Cell Proliferation in a Cilium-Independent Manner. https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.11.29.569194

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

m6A-Driven Intratumoral Cholesterol Biosynthesis Fuels Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Progression

Both nuclear pore complexes (NPCs) and RNA N6-methyladenosine (m6A) machinery are indispensable for proper cellular function. Although their collaborative roles in the nuclear export of messenger RNAs (mRNAs) have been reported, it remains ambiguous whether and how this collaboration may contribute to cancer progression. Here we identify a functional cooperation between NPCs and m6A signaling that promotes the development of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). We showed that nuclear export of m6A-modified mRNAs, mediated by the interaction between RNA methyltransferase METTL3 and the nucleoporin NUP93, is functionally coupled to cholesterol biosynthesis. Given that cholesterol-fueled intratumoral androgen production is one of the mechanisms driving CRPC, we demonstrated that overexpression of the wild-type METTL3 or NUP93, but neither the enzymatically dead METTL3 nor the mutant NUP93 that loses METTL3-interacting capability, elevates intracellular levels of androgens, activates AR signaling under castrate condition, and promotes androgen-independent growth of prostate cancer cells both in vitro and in vivo. Importantly, pharmacological inhibition of METTL3 or targeted demethylation on mRNAs encoding key cholesterol biosynthesis enzymes effectively suppressed CRPC malignancy. Together, these findings uncover a therapeutically targetable m6A-METTL3-NUP93 axis that links nuclear mRNA export and metabolic reprogramming to fuel CRPC progression, providing a conceptually new strategy for the treatment of this lethal disease.

cancer biology↗

ST6Gal2 promotes α2,6-sialylation and aggressive phenotypes in neuroblastoma cells

Neuroblastoma is the most common extracranial solid tumor of childhood. Its clinical behavior ranges from spontaneous regression to lethal, treatment-refractory disease. Aberrant 2,6-sialylation contributes to aggressive phenotypes in many cancers, but the role of ST6Gal2, a neural-enriched 2,6-sialyltransferase, in neuroblastoma is largely unexplored. Here, we examine the clinical and functional significance of ST6Gal2 in neuroblastoma. In two independent public cohorts (SEQC, n=498; Kocak, n=649), high ST6GAL2 expression was associated with significantly worse overall and event-free survival. In the SEQC cohort, ST6GAL2 expression was higher in high-risk and MYCN-amplified tumors, varied across International Neuroblastoma Staging System stages, and correlated positively with a mesenchymal transcriptional signature (Spearman {rho}=0.181). The mesenchymal correlation was reproduced in the Kocak cohort ({rho}=0.204). Stable shRNA-mediated knockdown of ST6GAL2 in SK-N-AS and SK-N-BE(2) cells reduced proliferation and viability, impaired wound closure, and decreased migration and invasion. In preliminary experiments in SK-N-AS cells, ST6GAL2 knockdown reduced binding of Sambucus nigra agglutinin, consistent with a role for ST6Gal2 in 2,6-sialylation. Together, these findings link ST6Gal2 expression to aggressive clinical and transcriptional features and pro-tumorigenic phenotypes in neuroblastoma and nominate ST6Gal2-mediated sialylation as a candidate pathway for mechanistic study.

cancer biology↗

Unsupervised transcriptomic analysis of paired pre- and post-treatment specimens reveals divergent chemoimmunomodulatory induction trajectories in breast cancer

The immunomodulatory effects of chemotherapy (chemoimmunomodulation; CIM) are clinically consequential and heterogeneous, yet no systematic framework exists for classifying the immunomodulatory trajectory a tumor follows in response to treatment (CIM trajectory). Here, we present the CIM Induction Classifier (CIMIC), an unsupervised clustering pipeline leveraging delta gene expression across 3,189 CIM-related genes to classify specimens chemoimmunomodulatory trajectory. Applied to two pre- and post-chemotherapy breast cancer (BC) datasets (NKI/SMC, N = 36; NEO, N = 19) and nine epirubicin-perturbed triple-negative BC (TNBC) cell lines, CIMIC identified two divergent CIM trajectories: a functional CIM (Fun-CIM) trajectory, broadly conserved across tumors and cell lines and characterized by induction of inflammatory cell death, antigen presentation, viral mimicry, and adaptive immune activation programs, and a dysfunctional CIM (Dys-CIM) trajectory, characterized by induction of proteostatic and metabolic stress-adaptation programs, reduced immune cell abundances and cytotoxic activity, and enrichment of aggressive BC subtypes. Using survival and longitudinal transcriptomic data in NKI/SMC (N = 20), treatment-induced increases in Fun-CIM-associated genes and ssGSEA scores were associated with reduced recurrence, whereas Dys-CIM-associated genes and scores were associated with increased recurrence. In multivariable analyses within independent chemotherapy-treated BC cohorts (METABRIC, N = 412; SCAN-B, N = 2,462), higher baseline Fun-CIM ssGSEA scores were associated with better outcomes, whereas higher baseline Dys-CIM ssGSEA scores were associated with worse outcomes. These findings establish CIM as a dynamic, trajectory-level process and position CIMIC as a framework for defining CIM trajectories and supporting future efforts to identify predictors, mechanisms, and therapeutic strategies that maximize beneficial CIM.

cancer biology↗