How resource abundance and stochasticity affect organisms' space-use requirements

Abstract

The amount of space organisms use is thought to be tightly linked to the availability of resources within their habitats, such that organisms living in productive habitats generally require less space than those in resource-poor habitats. This hypothesis has widespread em-pirical support, but existing studies have focused primarily on responses to the mean amount of resources, while responses to the variance around the mean are still largely unknown. This is not a trivial oversight. Organisms adjust to variable environmental conditions, so failing to consider the effects of resource (un)predictability can result in a limited understanding of an organisms range size, which challenges ecological theory and applied conservation alike. In this study, we leverage the available literature to provide a unifying framework and hypotheses for the effect of mean and variance in resources on range sizes. Next, we use simulated movement data to demonstrate how the combined effects of mean and variance in resource abundance interact to shape predictable patterns in range size. Finally, we use real-world tracking data on a lowland tapir (Tapirus terrestris) from the Brazilian Cerrado to show how this framework can be applied to better understand the movement ecology of free-ranging animals.