bioRxiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/bioRxiv

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2023.09.20.558566

Test-retest reliability of spectral parameterization by 1/f characterization using SpecParam

McKeown, D. J.·Finley, A.·Kelley, N.·Cavanagh, J.·Keage, H.·Baumann, O.·Schinazi, V.·Moustafa, A.·Angus, D.
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

SpecParam (formally known as FOOOF) allows for the refined measurements of electroencephalography periodic and aperiodic activity, and potentially provides a non-invasive measurement of excitation:inhibition balance. However, little is known about the psychometric properties of this technique. This is integral for understanding the usefulness of SpecParam as a tool to determine differences in measurements of cognitive function, and electroencephalography activity. We used intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) to examine the test-retest reliability of parameterized activity across three sessions (90 minutes apart and 30 days later) in 49 healthy young adults at rest with eyes open (EO), eyes closed (EC), and during three EC cognitive tasks including subtraction (Math), music recall (Music), and episodic memory (Memory). ICCs were good for the aperiodic exponent and offset (ICCs > .70) and parameterized periodic activity (ICCs > .66 for alpha and beta power, central frequency, and bandwidth) across conditions. Across all three sessions, SpecParam performed poorly in EO (40% of participants had poor fits over non-central sites) and had poor test-retest reliability for parameterized periodic activity. SpecParam mostly provides reliable metrics of individual differences in parameterized neural activity. More work is needed to understand the suitability of EO resting data for parameterization using SpecParam.

Explore related subjects

neurosciencePreprint

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

McKeown, D. J., Finley, A., Kelley, N., Cavanagh, J., Keage, H., Baumann, O., Schinazi, V., Moustafa, A., Angus, D.. 2023-09-22. Test-retest reliability of spectral parameterization by 1/f characterization using SpecParam. https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.09.20.558566

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

bioRxiv2026

Distinguishing evidence accumulation from choice confidence in neural signatures of perceptual decision making

Human electrophysiology research has identified the centro-parietal positivity (CPP) as an apparent neural correlate of sensory evidence accumulation during perceptual decision-making. The CPP has also been shown to closely scale with subjective confidence. Coupled with the fact of its domain-generality and lack of choice selectivity, this observation raises the possibility that the CPP might in fact trace subjective confidence rather than cumulative evidence, two quantities that are closely correlated in most experiments. To disentangle confidence from cumulative evidence, we used predictive cues with 80% validity to manipulate prior expectations of participants during a contrast discrimination task while recording electroencephalography (EEG). At the time of decision termination, confidence is expected to reach a higher level for validly cued versus invalidly cued choices, whereas the opposite would be expected of a cumulative evidence signal due to biased decision starting points. As expected, valid cues led to faster, more accurate and more confident responses compared to invalid and neutral cues. At the neural level, cues produced systematic increases in preparation of the expected action prior to evidence onset as indexed by premotor mu/beta activity, consistent with cue-biased criterion adjustments. The pre-response CPP amplitude was significantly reduced for validly cued choices and the effect remained even when matching for confidence. Together these findings suggest that the CPP is not a direct read-out of subjective confidence, but an evidence accumulation signal that contributes to both decision formation and confidence estimation.

neuroscience↗
bioRxiv2026

A Neurocompliant Ionic Conductive Hydrogel Orchestrates Glial and Vascular Remodeling to Mitigate Traumatic Brain Injury

Developing conductive scaffolds for neural regeneration is often hindered by the cytotoxicity and mechanical mismatch inherent to conventional electronic fillers. Here, we report an ultrasoft ionically conductive hydrogel engineered by grafting choline-based bioionic liquids (BIL) onto fish gelatin (FiBGel). Systematic optimization yields brain-mimetic conductivity (0.25-0.68 S/m), elastic moduli (0.6-0.9 kPa), and physiological water content (72-81%). In 3D culture, the matrix drives spontaneous neurogenesis, achieving ~90% MAP2+ neurons with robust calcium signaling, while concurrently supporting endothelial network formation. We report the first intracerebral administration of a BIL hydrogel, demonstrating remarkable biocompatibility and immunomodulation. In a traumatic brain injury model, a single FiBGel dose halves reactive astrogliosis, enhances cortical revascularization, and limits lesion cavity expansion. Leveraging an FDA-recognized micronutrient, FiBGel offers a translatable strategy that integrates neuromechanics, conductivity, immune modulation, and vascular support within one injectable scaffold for minimally invasive treatment of brain injuries.

neuroscience↗
bioRxiv2026

Changes in anterior cingulate connectivity associated with response to antidepressant treatment for major depressive disorder

Background: Resting-state functional connectivity (rsFC) involving the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and the hippocampal formation has been implicated in major depressive disorder (MDD) and antidepressant response. However, it remains unclear whether connectivity changes in distinct ACC subdivisions and hippocampal formation reflect general antidepressant effects or are specifically associated with clinical improvement. Methods: Forty-one, unmedicated adults with MDD underwent functional MRI before and after 8 weeks of sertraline or bupropion treatment. Seed-based rsFC analyses examined subgenual ACC (sgACC), pregenual ACC (pgACC), dorsal ACC (dACC), and hippocampal formation connectivity. Linear mixed-effects models tested whether connectivity change was associated with treatment response, remission, and dimensional improvement in depressive symptoms. Results: Thirty individuals (73.2%) responded to treatment and 26 (63.4%) achieved remission. Overall, rsFC decreased pre- to post-treatment between (1) dACC and pgACC (but not sgACC and hippocampal formation) and (2) cortical regions primarily involving default mode and frontoparietal networks. When considering treatment response, differences in sgACC and pgACC connectivity with temporal and inferior frontal regions emerged (increased in responders vs. decreased in non-responders). Remission was similarly associated with increased sgACC connectivity with temporal and prefrontal regions, and increased sgACC connectivity with temporal cortical regions related to greater reductions in depressive symptoms. Conclusions: Antidepressant treatment was associated with distinct patterns of ACC connectivity change, with general reductions in dorsal and pregenual connectivity but increases in subgenual and pregenual connectivity associated with favorable clinical outcomes. Findings suggest that changes in sgACC/pgACC connectivity are particularly relevant to antidepressant treatment response. Keywords: Major depressive disorder; Resting-state functional connectivity; Anterior cingulate cortex; Antidepressant treatment; Treatment response; Subgenual anterior cingulate cortex.

neuroscience↗