bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2023.09.18.558175

ESR1 fusion proteins invoke breast cancer subtype-dependent enrichment of ligand independent pro-oncogenic signatures and phenotypes

Abstract

Breast cancer is a leading cause of female mortality and despite advancements in diagnostics and personalized therapeutics, metastatic disease largely remains incurable due to drug resistance. Fortunately, identification of mechanisms of therapeutic resistance have rapidly transformed our understanding of cancer evasion and is enabling targeted treatment regimens. When the druggable estrogen receptor (ER, ESR1), expressed in two-thirds of all breast cancer, is exposed to endocrine therapy, there is risk of somatic mutation development in approximately 30% of cases and subsequent treatment resistance. A more recently discovered mechanism of ER mediated endocrine resistance is the expression of ER fusion proteins. ER fusions, which retain the proteins DNA binding domain, harbor ESR1 exons 1-6 fused to an in-frame gene partner resulting in loss of the 3 ER ligand binding domain (LBD). In this report we demonstrate that in no-special type (NST) and invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) cell line models, ER fusion proteins exhibit robust hyperactivation of canonical ER signaling pathways independent of the ligand estradiol or anti-endocrine therapies such as Fulvestrant and Tamoxifen. We employ cell line models stably overexpressing ER fusion proteins with concurrent endogenous ER knockdown to minimize the influence of endogenous wildtype ER. Cell lines exhibited shared transcriptomic enrichment in pathways known to be drivers of metastatic disease, notably the MYC pathway. The heterogeneous 3 fusion partners, particularly transcription factors SOX9 and YAP1, evoked varying degrees of transcriptomic and cistromic activity that translated into unique phenotypic readouts. Herein we report that cell line activity is subtype-, fusion-, and assay-specific suggesting that the loss of the LBD, the 3 fusion partner, and the cellular landscape all influence fusion activity. Therefore, it will be critical to generate additional data on frequency of the ER fusions, in the context of the clinicopathological features of the tumor. SignificanceER fusion proteins exhibit diverse mechanisms of endocrine resistance in breast cancer cell lines representing the no special type (NST) and invasive lobular cancer (ILC) subtypes. Our emphasize upon both the shared and unique cellular adaptations imparted by ER fusions offers the foundation for further translational research and clinical decision making.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Yates, M. E., Li, Z., Li, Y., Guzolik, H., Wang, X., Liu, T., Hooda, J., Atkinson, J. M., Lee, A. V., Oesterreich, S.. 2023-09-19. ESR1 fusion proteins invoke breast cancer subtype-dependent enrichment of ligand independent pro-oncogenic signatures and phenotypes. https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.09.18.558175

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

BAP1 loss and PRAME expression converge to remodel the tumor-immune ecosystem during uveal melanoma progression

Uveal melanoma (UM) is characterized by a small number of recurrent genetic alterations that determine metastatic propensity. BAP1 loss and PRAME expression define the dominant prognostic axes in UM, yet how they promote malignant progression remains unclear. We profiled 190,535 cells from normal uvea, uveal nevus, primary and metastatic UM using single-cell transcriptomics, T cell receptor sequencing, spatial transcriptomics and isogenic perturbation models. Normal melanocytes, nevus cells and UM cells formed a transcriptional continuum marked by loss of differentiation and emergence of neural crest-like, stress-responsive, hypoxic-glycolytic and immune-interacting states. BAP1 loss and PRAME expression imposed distinct but convergent immunoregulatory programs, inducing interferon and TNF-NFkB signaling and MHC-I expression, with HLA-E showing the strongest response. These alterations were accompanied by macrophage and CD8+ T cell remodeling. PRAME-enriched tumor regions formed spatially organized niches enriched for macrophages and plasma cells. These findings define BAP1 loss and PRAME expression as distinct but convergent axes of tumor-immune coevolution and nominate HLA-E as a candidate mediator of immune resistance.

cancer biology↗

A plasma metabolomics workflow for breast cancer detection using quantitative GC/MS and machine learning

Blood-based metabolomic profiling has been widely investigated for breast cancer (BC) detection; however, clinical implementation remains limited due to variability in sample handling, analytical reproducibility, and overfitting during statistical analysis. We established a plasma GC/MS metabolomics workflow for discriminating BC from healthy controls (HC) using conventional machine-learning algorithms. Plasma samples (n = 360; BC = 180, HC = 180) were collected prospectively under standardized preanalytical conditions before surgery and the initiation of systematic anticancer therapy and analyzed using a quantitative GC/MS platform with automated derivatization. Feature selection and model development were conducted using three machine-learning (ML) algorithms (Lasso logistic regression (LR), random forest classifier (RFC), and support vector machine (SVM)). A total of 45 metabolite candidate biomarkers were identified, and the optimal number of metabolite features for each algorithm was estimated by a recursive feature elimination (RFE)-based strategy. The best-performing models achieved area under the ROC curve values (AUC) of 0.910 (LR), 0.893 (RFC), and 0.843 (SVM). We selected prioritizing candidate biomarkers consistently expressed across the multi-algorithm pipeline. A bagging ensemble model improved stability (AUC = 0.911) and reduced false-positive predictions in the independent HC dataset. In addition, model stability with respect to false-positive predictions was assessed using an independent HC cohort (n = 15) that was collected at a separate institution. These results indicate that a plasma metabolomics workflow combined with conventional multi-algorithm ML, algorithm-specific feature selection, and independent assessment provides stable discrimination between BC and HC in a moderately sized cohort.

cancer biology↗

Prognostic value, signal interaction network, and immune infiltration characteristics of MET gene expression in gastric cancer analyzed by multi-database bioinformatics

Objective Based on the bioinformatics method of multi-database integration, this study systematically analyzes the expression characteristics, clinical pathological correlation, prognostic value, potential molecular mechanisms, and immune infiltration patterns of hepatocyte growth factor receptor (MET) in gastric cancer. Methods The UALCAN and GEPIA databases were employed to examine the differential expression of MET between gastric cancer and normal gastric mucosal tissues, as well as its associations with clinicopathological features. Kaplan-Meier Plotter was utilized to evaluate the impact of MET expression on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Protein-protein interaction (PPI) network was constructed via LinkedOmics, followed by Gene Ontology (GO) functional annotation and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analysis of co-expressed genes. Four algorithms, TIMER, CIBERSORT, EPIC, and MCPcounter, were used to cross evaluate the correlation between MET expression and immune cell infiltration; Further validate the cell type specific expression of MET using the gastric cancer single-cell sequencing queues (GSE134520, GSE167297) built into the TISCH database. Results MET expression was significantly elevated in gastric cancer tissues compared with normal gastric mucosa (P < .05), and its expression level was significantly correlated with tumor grade and TNM stage. Patients with high MET expression exhibited significantly poorer OS and PFS than those with low MET expression (P < .05). The PPI network revealed that MET could interact with 20 key proteins, including EGFR, ERBB2, HGF, STAT3, and GRB2 etc. GO enrichment analysis suggests that differentially expressed genes are significantly enriched in functions such as the ERBB signaling pathway, cadherin binding, and DNA repair complexes; KEGG enrichment analysis showed that MET related genes were significantly enriched in pathways such as homologous recombination, nuclear cytoplasmic transport, mismatch repair, and oxidative phosphorylation. Immune infiltration analysis showed that the negative association between MET and B cells infiltration has cross algorithm robustness, while the association with neutrophils, CD8+ T cells, CD4+ T cells, and macrophages exhibits algorithmic heterogeneity or insignificance; There is no significant correlation between MET and common immune checkpoint molecules such as PD-1, PD-L1, CTLA4, etc. Single cell validation further confirmed that MET is mainly enriched in malignant epithelial cells and endothelial cells, and is almost not expressed in immune cells. Conclusions Multidimensional bioinformatic analyses demonstrate that elevated MET expression serves as an independent risk factor for unfavorable prognosis in gastric cancer. MET may mediate dual drug resistance in gastric cancer via crosstalk with multiple signaling molecules (including EGFR, ERBB2, HGF, STAT3 and GRB2) and dysregulation of the homologous recombination repair pathway. Results from multiple-algorithm immune infiltration analysis, single-cell dataset analysis and immune checkpoint correlation analysis indicate that MET exerts only modest direct regulatory effects on the gastric cancer immune microenvironment. This exploratory study offers systematic bioinformatic evidence supporting MET as a candidate prognostic biomarker and potential therapeutic target for gastric cancer. Further functional experiments and prospective cohort studies are required to validate its molecular mechanisms and clinical utility.

cancer biology↗