bioRxiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/bioRxiv

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2023.09.13.557568

Comparative analysis of metabolic models of microbial communities reconstructed from automated tools and consensus approaches

Hsieh, Y. E.·Tandon, K.·Verbruggen, H.·Nikoloski, Z.
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Genome-scale metabolic models (GEMs) of microbial communities offer valuable insights into the functional capabilities of their members and facilitate the exploration of microbial interactions. These models are generated using different automated reconstruction tools, each relying on different biochemical databases that may affect the conclusions drawn from the in silico analysis. One way to address this problem is to employ a consensus reconstruction method that combines the outcomes of different reconstruction tools. Here, we conducted a comparative analysis of community models reconstructed from three automated tools, i.e. CarveMe, gapseq, and KBase, alongside a consensus approach, utilizing data from two marine bacterial communities. Our analysis revealed that these reconstruction approaches, while based on the same genomes, resulted in GEMs with varying numbers of genes and reactions as well as metabolic functionalities, attributed to the different databases employed. Further, our results indicated that the set of exchanged metabolites was more influenced by the reconstruction approach rather than the specific bacterial community investigated. This observation suggests a potential bias in predicting metabolite interactions using community GEMs. We also showed that consensus models encompassed a larger number of reactions and metabolites while concurrently reducing the presence of dead-end metabolites. Therefore, the usage of consensus models allows making full and unbiased use from aggregating genes from the different reconstructions in assessing the functional potential of metabolic communities. ImportanceOur study contributes significantly to the field of microbial community modeling through a comprehensive comparison of genome-scale metabolic models (GEMs) generated via various automated tools, including: CarveMe, gapseq, KBase, and a consensus approach. We revealed substantial structural disparities in model outcomes, primarily attributed to variations in the employed databases. A key finding underscored the substantial impact of the reconstruction approach on the set of exchanged metabolites, emphasizing the necessity for enhanced data integration strategies. The consensus models emerge as a powerful solution, exhibiting improved functional capabilities by encompassing a greater number of reactions, metabolites, and genes. This not only offers a more comprehensive representation of metabolic networks within bacterial communities but also shows promise in reducing variability for more accurate predictions of exchange metabolites. Overall, our research provides a critical framework for refining microbial community simulations, impacting fields from ecology to synthetic biology.

Source connections

Explore related subjects

systems biologyPreprint

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Hsieh, Y. E., Tandon, K., Verbruggen, H., Nikoloski, Z.. 2023-09-17. Comparative analysis of metabolic models of microbial communities reconstructed from automated tools and consensus approaches. https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.09.13.557568

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

bioRxiv2026

INFORME: coupling information-theoretic experimental design with nonlinear mixed-effects modeling for efficient observation scheduling

Mathematical models of treatment response can inform individualized therapy, but their calibration often requires longitudinal measurements that are costly, burdensome, and collected on fixed schedules. Such schedules may be inefficient, over-sampling patients whose response is already well characterized while delaying informative measurements for those whose model parameters remain uncertain. We present INFORME (INFORmation-theoretic design with Mixed Effects), a framework that combines Bayesian information-theoretic experimental design with nonlinear mixed-effects modeling to adaptively select each patients next measurement time. Population and response-subgroup parameter distributions learned from an existing cohort provide informative priors, allowing candidate measurement times to be ranked by their expected reduction in patient-specific parameter uncertainty. As observations accumulate, priors can be updated to reflect the response subgroup most consistent with the patients data. We evaluate INFORME in two radiotherapy datasets: 150 synthetic tumor volume trajectories from a hybrid cellular automaton model of prostate cancer spheroids (HD1) and longitudinal tumor volumes from 39 patients with head-and-neck cancer (HD2). In HD1, population priors allowed omission of both pretreatment scans, while adaptive scheduling reduced the protocol from nine scans to three or four, with the response group identified from a single post-treatment scan on day 27. In HD2, the adaptive schedule used three scans instead of six and improved prediction by delaying the first on-treatment scan from week 1 to week 2, avoiding transient dynamics that produced false-positive and false-negative response projections. Across both datasets, the adaptive schedules used a mean of 2.7 scans in stead of seven and advanced completion of the patient-specific prediction by a mean of 15.5 days (95% CI, 6.7-24.3) relative to the equidistant protocol, while treatment duration remained unchanged. INFORME therefore reduces measurement burden and accelerates patient-specific prediction by concentrating observations at times that are most informative for model calibration.

systems biology↗
bioRxiv2026

Sobetirome, a thyroid hormone receptor beta agonist, is a potential therapeutic agent for pulmonary fibrosis

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a progressive and fatal disease with limited treatment options. Our group previously identified the antifibrotic potential of thyroid hormone, triiodothyronine (T3); however, clinical translation of thyroid hormone therapy is limited by its systemic adverse effects. In this study, we investigate whether sobetirome, a selective and well tolerated thyroid hormone receptor beta (THRB) agonist, offers antifibrotic benefits of thyroid hormone while minimizing systemic toxicity. Our study reveals that sobetirome, administered via intraperitoneal or inhalational routes, effectively mitigates bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis in mice, with no evidence of toxicity. We identified that sobetirome restores mitochondrial homeostasis via activating the THRB-PPARGC1a axis. This protects alveolar type II epithelial cells from injury-induced apoptosis while selectively inducing apoptosis and metabolic reprogramming in apoptosis resistant IPF fibroblasts. Cell-specific deletion of Ppargc1a in either alveolar epithelial cells or fibroblasts abolishes sobetirome-mediated protection, establishing PPARGC1a as an essential mediator of therapeutic response. Importantly, sobetirome reverses fibrosis-associated transcriptional programs in human IPF lung tissue, reducing expression of key fibrosis-associated genes, including collagen I alpha 1 (COL1A1), collagen III alpha 1 (COL3A1), periostin (POSTN), cathepsin K (CTSK), and Chitinase 3 Like 1 (CHI3L1), while promoting extracellular matrix remodeling, epithelial restoration, and tissue homeostasis. Collectively, our findings identify THRB activation as a novel metabolic strategy for reversing pulmonary fibrosis. Across complementary in vitro, in vivo, and human ex vivo models, sobetirome restores mitochondrial function, modulates apoptotic pathways in pathogenic cells, and promotes fibrosis resolution, highlighting its potential as a lung-targeted therapeutic approach for IPF and other fibrotic lung diseases.

systems biology↗
bioRxiv2026

Mechanistic modeling of bacterial translation initiation across growth conditions

Translation frequency in bacteria depends on how ribosomes, mRNAs, and initiation factors are allocated across growth conditions. Here, we developed a mechanistic ODE-based model of Escherichia coli translation that represents initiation, elongation, termination, and coupled auxiliary processes. Growth-dependent abundances were derived from physiological relationships and reprocessed omics data, and simulated outputs were compared with translation-frequency and active-ribosome references. The model predicts a continuous shift from complex-formation-limited toward ribosome-limited behavior as growth increases. This shift is characterized by a decline in free-ribosome abundance, whereas initiation-factor pools remain largely unbound and do not become depleted in parallel. Together with the implemented IF-dependent kinetic term, this preserved availability provides a model-internal route through which productive initiation can be maintained despite increasing ribosome utilization. Consistently, transcript-wide ribosome loading remains below its theoretical maximum, while COG-level simulations reveal distinct sector-specific translation-frequency trajectories. The study therefore provides a resource-allocation framework for interpreting how mRNA--ribosome interactions shape bacterial translation across growth conditions.

systems biology↗