Differences Between Human and Non-Human Primate Theory of Mind: Evidence from Computational Modeling

Berke, M.; Horschler, D.; Jara-Ettinger, J.; Santos, L.

doi:10.1101/2023.08.02.551487

Home/Archive/bioRxiv

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2023.08.02.551487

Differences Between Human and Non-Human Primate Theory of Mind: Evidence from Computational Modeling

Berke, M.·Horschler, D.·Jara-Ettinger, J.·Santos, L.

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Can non-human primates (NHPs) represent other minds? Answering this question is difficult because primates can fail tasks due to a lack of motivation or succeed through simpler strategies. Here we address these challenges through a computational theory-testing framework for NHP Theory of Mind. In this framework, each theory combines a proposed social representation with a parameter for how often it is used. This allow us to move beyond dichotomous positions about Theory of Minds presence or absence and instead analyze graded patterns of behavior as a combination of cognitive representations and their use. We apply this approach to one of the most foundational and well-studied aspects of Theory of Mind: the relation between seeing and knowing. Our results show that only theories in which NHPs have some representation of other minds can capture the qualitative pattern of successes and failures across five classic perspective-taking paradigms. However, these theories vary in their reliance on their representations, each showing significantly lower reliance than a human baseline. These results suggest that human and NHP social cognition differ in terms of reliance and possibly also in terms of representational complexity.

Explore related subjects

animal behavior and cognition Preprint

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Berke, M., Horschler, D., Jara-Ettinger, J., Santos, L.. 2023-08-03. Differences Between Human and Non-Human Primate Theory of Mind: Evidence from Computational Modeling. https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.08.02.551487

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

bioRxiv2026

Causal Multiscale Modeling of Ocular FLASH Electroretinography: Model Development, Experimental Fitting, and Spin-Glass--Percolation Predictions

\textbf{Purpose:} To develop a causal multiscale model of retinal electroretinography (ERG) after ocular ultrahigh-dose-rate (FLASH) and conventional-dose-rate (CONV) irradiation, evaluate the framework against published ocular ERG data, and derive prospective dose-response predictions for future validation. \textbf{Methods:} The retina was coarse-grained into $N=200$ functional modules. Local rate equations were formulated as Hodgkin--Huxley-inspired conductance-balance/RC reductions of retinal ion-channel and synaptic pathways. Radiation generated an injury field that altered phototransduction, a-wave and b-wave dynamics and, in the network extension, inter-module coupling and bond survival. A reduced amplitude benchmark and nested M0/M1/M2 causal models were evaluated. \textbf{Results:} The reduced benchmark achieved $R^2=0.9721$ and RMSE $=11.94~\mu$V. M0, M1, and M2 yielded $R^2=0.8546$, 0.8559, and 0.8560, respectively, indicating limited independent identifiability of the network terms from amplitude data alone. Under an exploratory 50\% retained-gain criterion, the reduced benchmark predicted a-wave preservation thresholds of 28.6 Gy for FLASH and 23.7 Gy for CONV, and b-wave thresholds of 29.2 Gy and 24.1 Gy, respectively, corresponding to a model-based functional dose-modifying factor (DMF) of 1.21. \textbf{Conclusion:} The ERG amplitude data support the causal radiation-injury-to-ERG framework, while additional observables will be needed to distinguish the predicted collective-network contributions. The model also provides quantitative dose targets for prospective studies of the FLASH retinal-preservation window and a framework for testing how local retinal injury may propagate into collective dysfunction.

animal behavior and cognition↗

bioRxiv2026

Neonatal personality is associated with sex-specific developmental trajectories in a wild mammal

Animal personality, defined as consistent among-individual differences in behaviour, is an important source of phenotypic variation, but its developmental origins and associations with subsequent development remain poorly understood. We measured neonatal personalities, early-life growth, and yearling male antler length in wild fallow deer (Dama dama). Using eight years of data, we estimated repeatability and among-individual correlations among neonatal personalities and growth and applied structural equation modelling to examine associations with yearling male morphology. Heart rate and behavioural reaction measures showed repeatable among-individual variation, demonstrating that stable differences were detectable shortly after birth. Behavioural reaction was negatively correlated with growth in males but not in females. Heart rate was not associated with growth in either sex. In males, the effects of neonatal behavioural reactivity persisted beyond early life: more behaviourally reactive neonates had shorter antlers as yearlings, indirectly through reduced early-life growth. These findings show that stable among-individual differences emerge during the neonatal period and are associated with sex-specific developmental trajectories.

animal behavior and cognition↗

bioRxiv2026

The role of familiarity in grouping decisions of Trinidadian guppies

Social grouping is widely observed in numerous taxa, providing individuals with a variety of benefits including efficient information exchange and predator protection. However, grouping can also carry costs such as increased competition for resources, which means that individuals must often make decisions regarding joining or leaving a group. These decisions to leave or stay might in turn depend on prior experience with potential groupmates. Past work has shown that many fish distinguish between familiar and unfamiliar conspecifics and use these distinctions in their grouping choices. Trinidadian guppies (Poecilia reticulata), well known for their diversity in shoaling preferences, are an excellent system in which to investigate the role of familiarity in grouping decisions. We examined preferences for familiar individuals following both a 15-day and 55-day cohabitation period in two different guppy populations. Utilizing two binary-choice designs, we found no evidence for a familiarity preference in either population, despite observing a high preference to group with conspecifics in both populations. These results suggest that various contextual- and population-level differences may impact familiarity preferences, in turn contributing to the growing body of work on the evolution of social organization and grouping decisions in teleost species and beyond.

animal behavior and cognition↗