bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2023.08.01.551585

Targeted analysis of dyslexia-associated regions on chromosomes 6, 12 and 15 in large multigenerational cohorts

Abstract

Dyslexia is a common specific learning disability with a strong genetic basis that affects word reading and spelling. An increasing list of loci and genes have been implicated, but analyses to-date investigated only limited genomic variation within each locus with no confirmed pathogenic variants. In a collection of >2000 participants in families enrolled at three independent sites, we performed targeted capture and comprehensive sequencing of all exons and some regulatory elements of five candidate dyslexia risk genes (DNAAF4, CYP19A1, DCDC2, KIAA0319 and GRIN2B) for which prior evidence of association exists from more than one sample. For each of six dyslexia-related phenotypes we used both individual-single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) and aggregate testing of multiple SNPs to evaluate evidence for association. We detected no promoter alterations and few potentially deleterious variants in the coding exons, none of which showed evidence of association with any phenotype. All genes except DNAAF4 provided evidence of association, corrected for the number of genes, for multiple non-coding variants with one or more phenotypes. Results for a variant in the downstream region of CYP19A1 and a haplotype in DCDC2 yielded particularly strong statistical significance for association. This haplotype and another in DCDC2 affected performance of real word reading in opposite directions. In KIAA0319, two missense variants annotated as tolerated/benign associated with poor performance on spelling. Ten non-coding SNPs likely affect transcription factor binding. Findings were similar regardless of whether phenotypes were adjusted for verbal IQ. Our findings from this large-scale sequencing study complement those from genome-wide association studies (GWAS), argue strongly against the causative involvement of large-effect coding variants in these five candidate genes, support an oligogenic etiology, and suggest a role of transcriptional regulation. Author SummaryFamily studies show that genes play a role in dyslexia and a small number of genomic regions have been implicated to date. However, it has proven difficult to identify the specific genetic variants in those regions that affect reading ability by using indirect measures of association with evenly spaced polymorphisms chosen without regard to likely function. Here, we use recent advances in DNA sequencing to examine more comprehensively the role of genetic variants in five previously nominated candidate dyslexia risk genes on several dyslexia-related traits. Our analysis of more than 2000 participants in families with dyslexia provides strong evidence for a contribution to dyslexia risk for the non-protein coding genetic variant rs9930506 in the CYP19A1 gene on chromosome 15 and excludes the DNAAF4 gene on the same chromosome. We identified other putative causal variants in genes DCDC2 and KIAA0319 on chromosome 6 and GRIN2B on chromosome 12. Further studies of these DNA variants, all of which were non-coding, may point to new biological pathways that affect susceptibility to dyslexia. These findings are important because they implicate regulatory variation in this complex trait that affects ability of individuals to effectively participate in our increasingly informatic world.

Source connections

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Raskind, W., Chapman, N., Navas, P., Dorschner, M., Mehaffey, M., Wigg, K., Price, K., Naumova, O., Elizabeth, K., Guger, S., Lovett, M., Grigorenko, E., Berninger, V., Barr, C., Wijsman, E.. 2023-08-03. Targeted analysis of dyslexia-associated regions on chromosomes 6, 12 and 15 in large multigenerational cohorts. https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.08.01.551585

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Large language model-based bibliometric evaluation of population descriptors in human genetics

As the use of population descriptors such as race, ethnicity, and ancestry have become increasingly common in modern genetics research, there have been growing calls to critically examine their use. Most notably, in 2023, the National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM) published a report titled Using Population Descriptors in Genetics and Genomics Research: A New Framework for an Evolving Field, which included eight specific and actionable recommendations for researchers to implement the ethical and accurate use of population descriptors in genetic research. Here, we use the 2023 NASEM report as a benchmark to analyze the use of population descriptors in genome-wide association studies (GWAS). We develop a general toolkit for large language model-based bibliometrics, operationalize the report's recommendations into an evaluation framework, and apply this framework to evaluate all 4,007 papers from the GWAS Catalog published between 2007 and 2025 with full text available on PubMedCentral. We find significant improvements in adherence to NASEM report recommendations over time. However, most improvements predate the publication of the NASEM report itself, suggesting the report functioned primarily as a synthesis of existing best practices rather than a catalyst for change. We conclude by highlighting opportunities for growth in the field of human genetics.

genetics↗

Mitigating biases of rescaling in forward-in-time population genetic simulations

Forward-in-time population genetic simulations are widely used in evolutionary analyses, but simulating large populations and long genomic regions remains computationally demanding. To reduce this cost, parameter rescaling is widely employed, in which the original evolutionary process is approximated by one with a smaller population size and fewer generations. Recently, several studies using the SLiM simulator have raised concerns about the accuracy of this rescaling approach. In this study, we show that many of the biases reported in these studies can be mitigated by using a different simulation algorithm. These results reveal that the accuracy of parameter rescaling depends on how well the simulation algorithm preserves diffusion-limit properties under rescaling.

genetics↗

OPA1 controls mitochondrial dysfunction-driven liver fibrosis in MASLD

Progressive hepatic fibrosis is the principal determinant of morbidity and mortality in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease and steatohepatitis (MASLD/MASH). Mitochondrial dysfunction is a hallmark of MASH, and the release of mitochondrial damage-associated molecular patterns (mito-DAMPs) from injured hepatocytes can promote fibrosis. However, how mitochondrial dynamics and quality control shape the fibrotic response in MASLD/MASH remains unclear. Here, through large-scale genomic analyses of mitochondrial genes governing mitophagy, fusion and fission in human MASLD, with a power-equivalent sample size of approximately 700,000 individuals, we identify a strong association between hepatic fibrosis and the mitochondrial fusion factor dynamin-like GTPase optic atrophy 1 (OPA1). OPA1 transcripts and protein abundance in the liver epithelium were progressively dysregulated with advancing fibrosis. In mice, hepatocyte-specific OPA1 loss alone was sufficient to induce hepatic stellate cell activation and fibrosis in zone 3, promoted the release of mito-DAMPs into the circulation and exacerbated fibrosis in experimental MASH. These findings identify OPA1 as a central regulator of the hepatic fibrotic response and connect defective mitochondrial homeostasis to mito-DAMP release, hepatic stellate cell activation and fibrosis in MASLD.

genetics↗