bioRxiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/bioRxiv

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2023.06.30.547165

ISiCell: involving biologists in the design process of agent-based models in cell biology

Cogoni, F.·Bernard, D.·Kazhen, R.·Valitutti, S.·Lobjois, V.·Cussat-Blanc, S.
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Agent-based models are commonly used in biology to study tissue-scale phenomena by reproducing the individual behavior of the cells. They offer the possibility to study cellular biology at the individual cell scale to explore the basic behavior of cells which are responsible of the emergence of more complex phenomena at the tissue scale. Additionally, they can produce a predictive tool that will help taking decisions for biologic experiments based on in silico simulations. However these models require a good intercomprehension between the biologists and the modelers and thus it may take weeks or months to end up providing a usable prototype. To address this limitation, we propose a new methodology to facilitate the dialog between biologists and modelers and improve biologists involvement in the design of the model. For this purpose, UML diagrams, in particular, state-transition and activity diagrams, are used. They allow a better comprehension of the model for the biologists and offer a general frame for structuring models. Visualization of simulations is also used to have qualitative feedbacks from the biologist on the model. They are instrumental to validate or refine the prototype before exploring it. Alongside this methodology, we propose a web platform that enables to build state-transition and activity diagrams to describe a model and translate them into code. The generated code is then compiled on-the-fly and simulations are ready to visualize and explore. The platform also disposes of tools to directly visualize and manually explore the model. These tools allow for qualitative validation of the model and additional interaction with the biologists. Finally in this article, we show the capacity of our platform to reproduce models from the literature and to build new models starting from workshops with biologists. Its range of application is wide and includes immunology, oncology or cell biology. Author summaryWe developed a methodology based on diagrams to facilitate the dialog between computer scientists and biologists when building in silico models. The main idea is to limit misunderstandings and improve the involvement of the biologists in the prototyping process. For this purpose, we use visual methods to simplify the modeling phase. Alongside this methodology, we propose a web platform, called ISiCell, which enables to visually code thanks to diagrams that will be translated into code. The platform allows for compiling the generated code on the fly and to visualize and explore the model directly with the platform. The strong advantage of the platform is that one day workshop biologist/modeler allows to build new models. Additionally, we were able to reproduce models from the literature within the modeling platform showing the versatility of the tool. Our long-term objective is to use our methodology and platform in new contexts to develop new models. We intend the make the platform more user friendly in order to expand the community of users. Involving biologists in the conception of in silico models might improve their acceptability in the community.

Explore related subjects

systems biologyPreprint

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Cogoni, F., Bernard, D., Kazhen, R., Valitutti, S., Lobjois, V., Cussat-Blanc, S.. 2023-07-01. ISiCell: involving biologists in the design process of agent-based models in cell biology. https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.06.30.547165

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

bioRxiv2026

Parsimonious Creatures: Building Gene Regulatory Networks Robust to Somatic Evolution

For early multicellular life to have formed and maintained cellular organization, preventing loss of controlled cell replication due to somatic evolution was of critical importance, and remains important to this day for control of cancer. We study how gene regulatory networks (GRNs) can be designed to slow the divergence of somatic clonal lineages in the context of early multicellular life. We model the mutation of GRNs within simplified 12-celled organisms we term "parsimonious creatures", who must replicate from a single cell to 12 cells and then prevent replication past 12 cells to maximize fitness. We found two minimal motifs can achieve these goals, but both are prone to breakdown through somatic evolution: The feedforward motif, which is loosely regulating but relatively robust, and the simple step motif, which uses strong interactions and feedback to form memoryless ultrasensitivity, but is fragile. These simple motifs may be duplicated to form redundant networks via one of two structures: averaging redundancy, which averages multiple sources of information, and min redundancy, which adopts the most conservative source. Averaging redundancy uniformly slows somatic evolution, while min redundancy stalls somatic evolution until neutral mutations accumulate. Either may be superior dependent on life history. However, averaging redundancy slowly increases fitness as the network becomes larger, but large min redundancy networks eventually become "paralyzed", increasing the probability of senescence and reducing fitness. These GRN designs are idealized, yet provide imperfect solutions with fundamental tradeoffs, offering insight as to why somatic evolution remains an incompletely solved problem for multicellular life.

systems biology↗
bioRxiv2026

Homogeneous network inference for subtype-stratified master regulator analysis in cancer

Master-regulator analysis of 34 TCGA tumour cohorts (cancer x molecular subtype; n between 27 and 562 tumours) requires one regulatory network per cohort. Mutual-information (MI) networks inferred with ARACNe3 are the usual choice, but they are not available for the smallest cohorts; filling the gap with correlation networks would mix two methods inside the very comparison between subtypes that the analysis is meant to make. We therefore infer every network with a single procedure, fixed-size Spearman regulons (FSR): rank correlation between regulator and target, a fixed effect-size threshold rho >= 0.2, the per-target data-processing-inequality (DPI) pruning implemented in corto, bootstrap support, and truncation to the 100 best-supported targets per regulator. We quantify what this choice concedes and what it provides, labelling each claim as a standard result, a heuristic, or an empirical result. Rank correlation is more powerful than the MI estimators we simulated for n < 200 but cannot see non-monotone dependence, which in a synthetic worst case costs at most about 0.05-0.10 of the master regulators recovered; the per-target DPI is a heuristic with a measurable disagreement rate with the MI-based one; and pairwise dependence is not direct interaction, for MI and correlation alike. Where both methods are feasible (n >= 95) they overlap in 0.7 of the top-20 regulators, the same as two filterings of the same ARACNe3 network, although the rank correlation of the full score vector shows a measurable method effect in the tail. Subsampling large real cohorts indicates that networks inferred from fewer than 60 tumours do not reliably reproduce their own cohort's master regulators, that 60-100 is a grey zone, and that a cancer-wide network does not rescue small subtypes. We present FSR as an adequate and uniform choice for multi-cohort analysis, not as a statistically superior one.

systems biology↗
bioRxiv2026

Low-fidelity simulator selection for multi-fidelity inference of epithelial vertex models

Vertex models link cell division, neighbour exchange, and intercellular forces to epithelial tissue form through parameters such as junctional line tension and perimeter contractility. Bayesian inference of these parameters from data quantifies their uncertainty, but for stochastic models of proliferating tissues it requires many costly simulations. Multi-fidelity simulation-based inference reduces this cost by training on many runs of a cheaper, less accurate ('low-fidelity') simulator before refining with a few full ('high-fidelity') runs. Low-fidelity versions can be constructed in several ways, for example by stopping simulations early, coarsening the timestep, or averaging fewer replicates, but it is unclear which to choose before committing to costly training. To address this, we introduce PRISM (Paired Ranking Index for Simulator Matching), a screen that compares each candidate with the full simulator on paired runs, scoring agreement in cell-packing statistics against cost. For a vertex model of a proliferating tissue, PRISM flags stopping early as unreliable before training; once trained, this choice can produce confidently wrong parameter estimates. By contrast, a coarser timestep, within the range tested, is cheap and accurate; while fewer replicates are accurate but too costly. Using a screened low-fidelity simulator, multi-fidelity inference outperforms approximate Bayesian computation and neural-network inference trained on full simulations alone, at matched cost and with well-calibrated uncertainty. The same pattern recurs for a second vertex model fitted to published Drosophila pupal-wing imaging data, although there stopping halfway proves safe. Together, our findings suggest that which approximations are safe depends on the model, and that screening them before training makes multi-fidelity inference of tissue mechanics practical.

systems biology↗