bioRxiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/bioRxiv

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2023.06.13.544773

Can leafhoppers help us trace the impact of climate change on agriculture?

Plante, N.·Durivage, J.·Brochu, A.-S.·Dumonceaux, T.·Torres, D.·Bahder, B.·Kits, J.·Dionne, A.·Legare, J.-P.·Tellier, S.·McCune, F.·Goulet, C.·Fournier, V.·Perez-Lopez, E.
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

SUMMARYClimate change is reshaping agriculture and insect biodiversity worldwide. With rising temperatures, insect species with narrow thermal margins are expected to be pushed beyond their thermal limits, and losses related to herbivory and diseases transmitted by them will be experienced in new regions. Several previous studies have investigated this phenomenon in tropical and temperate regions, locally and globally; however, here, it is proposed that climate changes impact on agriculture can be traced through the study of Nearctic migratory insects, specifically leafhoppers. To test this hypothesis, leafhoppers in strawberry fields located in the province of Quebec, eastern Canada, were evaluated. The strawberry-leafhopper pathosystem offers a unique opportunity because leafhoppers can transmit, among other diseases, strawberry green petal disease (SbGP), which is associated with pathogenic phytoplasmas. Here, we found that in the last ten years, the number of leafhoppers has been increasing in correspondence with the number of SbGP cases detected in eastern Canada, reporting for the first time ten species new to eastern Canada and two to the country, although the leafhopper diversity has been seriously affected. Our model using more than 34 000 leafhoppers showed that their abundance is influenced by temperature, a factor that we found also influences the microbiome associated with Macrosteles quadrilineatus, which was one of the most abundant leafhoppers we observed. One of our most striking findings is that none of the insecticides used by strawberry growers can control leafhopper incidence, which could be linked to microbiome changes induced by changing temperatures. We suggest that Nearctic leafhoppers can be used as sentinels to trace the multilayered effects of climate change in agriculture. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=185 SRC="FIGDIR/small/544773v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (77K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@e984eorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@3146a9org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1160b9aorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@53c39c_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG IN BRIEFThe current climate crisis is reshaping insect biodiversity and abundance, but little is known about the direct effect of this phenomenon on agriculture. In this study, we explored leafhoppers, a group of agriculturally important insect pests and disease vectors, as sentinels of the effect of climate change on agriculture. Our findings indicate that this group of insects can help us to understand the effect of the current climate crisis on insect invasions, diversity, abundance, disease dynamics and insecticide resistance and to take quick action to ensure food security while achieving more sustainable agriculture. HIGHLIGHTSO_LIMigratory leafhoppers benefit from temperature increases C_LIO_LILeafhopper-transmitted diseases have increased in the last decade C_LIO_LINew non-migratory leafhoppers can be found now in Nearctic regions C_LIO_LILeafhopper insecticide resistance could be linked to the insect microbiome C_LI

Explore related subjects

ecologyPreprint

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Plante, N., Durivage, J., Brochu, A.-S., Dumonceaux, T., Torres, D., Bahder, B., Kits, J., Dionne, A., Legare, J.-P., Tellier, S., McCune, F., Goulet, C., Fournier, V., Perez-Lopez, E.. 2023-06-14. Can leafhoppers help us trace the impact of climate change on agriculture?. https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.06.13.544773

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

bioRxiv2026

Beyond Single-Metric Assessments: Uncovering Masked Butterfly Declines via Multi-Scalar Analysis in Central Alberta

1. This study analyzed 21 years (2000-2025) of butterfly count data from Central Alberta, integrated with intensive 5-year (2021-2025) high-resolution intra-seasonal sampling. 2. Long-term macro-scale analysis revealed a significant decline in Shannon Diversity, a change that remained obscured when relying solely on traditional metrics of species richness and evenness. 3. This diversity decline was primarily driven by the severe, long-term collapse of the native Common Ringlet (Coenonympha tullia). 4. Four other dominant species--Cabbage White (Pieris rapae), Clouded Sulphur (Colias eriphyle), European Skipper (Thymelicus lineola), and Common Wood Nymph (Cercyonis pegala)--maintained long-term population stability, though their abundances were significantly constrained by extreme winter minimum temperatures and rapid spring warming. 5. High-resolution intra-seasonal analysis (2021-2025) demonstrated that community indices and species-specific abundances were strongly limited by daily weather, particularly wind velocity and temperature. 6. These findings illustrate that while traditional metrics like richness and evenness are fundamental to community ecology, they provide incomplete insights when applied in isolation; they are most effective when utilized as part of a complementary, multi-scalar framework. 7. This study highlights the necessity of coupling multi-decadal historical datasets with high-frequency, fine-scale sampling to accurately identify the mechanisms of community turnover that simpler metrics may overlook. 8. The results underscore the critical importance of standardized citizen science monitoring in quantifying environmental impacts and establishing conservation priorities for terrestrial insect groups.

ecology↗
bioRxiv2026

From concentration to export: resource contrasts and bee traits shape pollinator spillover to crops

Floral plantings can either concentrate bees or export them to adjacent crops, yet the ecological conditions influencing these outcomes remain unclear. Here, we develop a mathematical model as proof of concept for our previous integrative hypothesis: concentrator and exporter outcomes can arise as alternative, context-dependent outcomes of the same underlying resource-selection process. Using bees as a model and focusing specifically on spillover from floral plantings to crops, we identified resource-specific thresholds separating concentration- and export-favoring conditions. Our model translates differences in relative patch attractiveness into context-dependent concentration and export outcomes and generates resource-specific, testable predictions about the conditions favoring pollinator movement into crops. In our simulations, the concentrator-exporter transition occurred at a lower flowering-intensity contrast than at pollen or nectar contrasts, which suggests that flowering intensity may provide an initial cue for bee movement, whereas nectar and pollen rewards refine or sustain bee responses once crops are perceived as attractive. Spillover thresholds differed among resource contrasts, whereas response steepness varied across bee-trait and community scenarios. Under the model's trait-sensitivity formulation, predicted spillover probability responded more strongly to flowering contrast for specialists than for generalists; colony size amplified this response, whereas bee richness dampened it. Together, these patterns show how flowering and resource contrasts interact with bee traits and community context to shape predicted spillover. Our results confirm that the concentrator and exporter hypotheses can be understood as context-dependent outcomes of the same ecological process rather than as mutually exclusive alternatives. Experimental tests of the predicted thresholds conducted in the field could reveal when and where floral plantings are most likely to promote bee spillover to crops, potentially supporting crop pollination.

ecology↗
bioRxiv2026

A Computational Re-evaluation of Spatial Trials for Zoonotic Tuberculosis Control: Model Misspecification, Diagnostic Miss-classification, and the Illusion of Wildlife Culling Efficacy

1. Wildlife reservoir management frequently relies on the Randomised Badger Culling Trial's (RBCT) trade-off hypothesis, which posits that reductions in cattle herd infections are offset by a perturbation effect driven by disrupted host dispersal. This paper evaluates the computational and epidemiological robustness of this historical trial, which serves as the foundational empirical experiment guiding zoonotic tuberculosis (Mycobacterium bovis) control policies. 2. Using generalized linear mixed models with a generalized Poisson error distribution to explicitly address historical data overdispersion, this study contrasts traditional parametric inference against exact cluster-constrained permutation tests across distinct operational definitions of disease incidence. 3. Non-parametric diagnostics reveal that previously reported treatment and perturbation effects render as statistical artifacts under exact non-parametric permutation. Inside culling zones, parametric significance fails to withstand exact permutation verification due to extreme data leverage in localized cluster blocks. 4. Crucially, when diagnostic misclassification biases are eliminated by analysing total reactor datasets, all apparent culling effects disappear, and information criteria overwhelmingly favour nested null architectures. Unconfirmed reactors likely represent true biological infections missed by low-sensitivity post-mortem macro-necropsy, proving that host removal tracks observation noise rather than genuine zoonotic transmission pathways. 5. Finally, empirical scaling conducted in this study identifies a novel mathematical saturation effect, demonstrating that this sub-linear scaling is an operational artifact of unmodelled herd-level disease recurrence over time. 6. Policy implications. Because current zoonotic tuberculosis intervention frameworks are built upon a structurally misspecified statistical model, they have driven large-scale veterinary policies resulting in substantial, unevidenced ecological and economic interventions while failing to provide genuine public health, animal health, or disease control benefits.

ecology↗