What can Ribo-seq and proteomics tell us about the non-canonical proteome?

Prensner, J. R.; Abelin, J. G.; Kok, L. W.; Clauser, K. R.; Mudge, J. M.; Ruiz-Orera, J.; Bassani-Sternberg, M.; Deutsch, E. W.; van Heesch, S.

doi:10.1101/2023.05.16.541049

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2023.05.16.541049

What can Ribo-seq and proteomics tell us about the non-canonical proteome?

Prensner, J. R.·Abelin, J. G.·Kok, L. W.·Clauser, K. R.·Mudge, J. M.·Ruiz-Orera, J.·Bassani-Sternberg, M.·Deutsch, E. W.·van Heesch, S.

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Ribosome profiling (Ribo-seq) has proven transformative for our understanding of the human genome and proteome by illuminating thousands of non-canonical sites of ribosome translation outside of the currently annotated coding sequences (CDSs). A conservative estimate suggests that at least 7,000 non-canonical open reading frames (ORFs) are translated, which, at first glance, has the potential to expand the number of human protein-coding sequences by 30%, from [~]19,500 annotated CDSs to over 26,000. Yet, additional scrutiny of these ORFs has raised numerous questions about what fraction of them truly produce a protein product and what fraction of those can be understood as proteins according to conventional understanding of the term. Adding further complication is the fact that published estimates of non-canonical ORFs vary widely by around 30-fold, from several thousand to several hundred thousand. The summation of this research has left the genomics and proteomics communities both excited by the prospect of new coding regions in the human genome, but searching for guidance on how to proceed. Here, we discuss the current state of non-canonical ORF research, databases, and interpretation, focusing on how to assess whether a given ORF can be said to be "protein-coding". In briefThe human genome encodes thousands of non-canonical open reading frames (ORFs) in addition to protein-coding genes. As a nascent field, many questions remain regarding non-canonical ORFs. How many exist? Do they encode proteins? What level of evidence is needed for their verification? Central to these debates has been the advent of ribosome profiling (Ribo-seq) as a method to discern genome-wide ribosome occupancy, and immunopeptidomics as a method to detect peptides that are processed and presented by MHC molecules and not observed in traditional proteomics experiments. This article provides a synthesis of the current state of non-canonical ORF research and proposes standards for their future investigation and reporting. HighlightsO_LICombined use of Ribo-seq and proteomics-based methods enables optimal confidence in detecting non-canonical ORFs and their protein products. C_LIO_LIRibo-seq can provide more sensitive detection of non-canonical ORFs, but data quality and analytical pipelines will impact results. C_LIO_LINon-canonical ORF catalogs are diverse and span both high-stringency and low-stringency ORF nominations. C_LIO_LIA framework for standardized non-canonical ORF evidence will advance the research field. C_LI Graphical Abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=107 SRC="FIGDIR/small/541049v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (28K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@4878d0org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1f3c9e4org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@4ba1f7org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@17695a6_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Explore related subjects

genomics Preprint

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Prensner, J. R., Abelin, J. G., Kok, L. W., Clauser, K. R., Mudge, J. M., Ruiz-Orera, J., Bassani-Sternberg, M., Deutsch, E. W., van Heesch, S.. 2023-05-18. What can Ribo-seq and proteomics tell us about the non-canonical proteome?. https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.05.16.541049

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

bioRxiv2026

Contig-Resolved Genetic Context of Antimicrobial Resistome in Sediments of Two Contrasting Wastewater-Impacted Rivers

River sediments harbor diverse antimicrobial resistance (AMR) determinants; however, gene abundance alone provides limited insight into their genomic context, mobility potential, and associated bacterial hosts. This study employed an assembly- and read-mapping metagenomic framework to surface-sediment metagenomes (40.78 Gb clean data) from two contrasting wastewater-impacted Indian rivers, Adyar (Chennai) and Musi (Hyderabad), retaining sample-, contig- and open reading frame level provenance. ARG-carrying contigs (ACCs; n = 2,402) were annotated for mobile genetic elements (MGEs), biocide/metal resistance genes (BMRGs), virulence factor genes (VFGs), nitrogen-cycling genes (NCycGs), and putative host taxonomy. The resistomes exhibited substantial diversity (264 ARG subtypes) and spatial heterogeneity, with subtype richness in the Adyar (up to 171 subtypes) than in the Musi, where richness progressively declined downstream. Rank IV determinants dominated ARG abundance (77.82%), whereas Rank I determinants accounted for only 9.89%. MGEs were detected on just 3.12% (75/2,402) of ACCs, predominantly comprising plasmid-like contigs and proximal ARG-MGE associations. Co-occurrence with BMRGs was observed on 386 ACCs, whereas VFGs were uncommon (26 ACCs) and primarily represented dual-annotated efflux and envelope-integrity determinants rather than independent virulence loci. NCyc annotations were sparse (12 ACCs), with no evidence of complete nitrification or denitrification pathways. Taxonomic classification resolved 217 ACCs to the species level, with no matches to curated human pathogenic bacteria. Only two Acinetobacter-assigned ACCs exhibited both genus-level pathogenicity and mobility evidence. These findings highlight the importance of integrating mobility and host-taxonomic information to distinguish baseline environmental resistance from potential priorities for AMR surveillance.

genomics↗

bioRxiv2026

Time-resolved single-cell screening reveals the dynamic regulatory architecture of human cardiogenesis

Congenital heart disease (CHD) originates during early embryogenesis, yet when disease genes act cannot be determined from existing data. Human fetal heart atlases lack critical time points, and perturbation screens that systematically assess gene function currently profile at most a few time points. Here we combined single-cell CRISPR screening of 400 disease-relevant genes in cardioids, sampled daily over seven developmental days (~975,000 cells), with a matched multiome atlas. Perturbation phenotypes were strongly dependent on developmental stage. Perturbations that reshaped cell-fate allocation or gene expression were enriched for CHD-linked genes, and most acted already during progenitor stages. Timing was largely independent of the target gene's own expression, marking instead when a cell state became functionally dependent on it, and some effects persisted after expression declined. Consensus gene regulatory networks integrating perturbation and multiome data recovered stage-specific regulators and nominated HOXB2 and HOXB3 as candidate cardiac regulators. Many perturbations converged on shared downstream programmes, which were reorganised through differentiation. Effects correlated in progenitors were maintained in differentiated cells, split into distinct programmes, converged with other perturbations or disappeared entirely, indicating that gene function is highly context dependent. Beyond advancing our understanding of the developmental regulatory logic underlying CHD, our work provides a resource for developing context-dependent models for in silico prediction of perturbation effects.

genomics↗

bioRxiv2026

A Y-specific translocated gsdf copy is a candidate master sex-determining gene in common dab (Limanda limanda)

Sex-determining systems in flatfishes are highly diverse, and even closely related species can differ in both sex-determining loci and heterogametic systems. In common dab (Limanda limanda), the genetic basis of sex determination has not yet been established. Here, we investigated sex determination using pooled whole-genome sequencing combined with long-read genome sequencing of females and males from Iceland and Norway. Genome-wide allele-frequency analyses identified sex-associated regions consistent with male heterogamety (XX/XY), with the strongest signal on chromosome 16. Comparison of the existing reference assembly, which represents an X haplotype at this locus, with a haplotype-resolved male PacBio HiFi assembly revealed a [~]21.5 kb Y-specific insertion on chromosome 16. The insertion showed complete coverage in male pools but little or no coverage in female pools from either population. It contained a translocated genomic segment including a copy of gonadal soma-derived factor (gsdf) and a predicted gene of unknown function. Comparative genomic analyses were consistent with this segment originating from an autosomal gsdf-containing region on chromosome 1. Given the recurrent recruitment of gsdf as a sex-determining factor in teleosts, we designate the Y-linked copy gsdfY and identify it as the strongest candidate for the master sex-determining gene in common dab. Additional broad sex-associated differentiation on chromosome 19 was restricted to the Icelandic samples and may reflect population-specific expansion of the sex-linked region, although its structural basis remains unresolved. Together, these findings provide the first genomic characterization of sex determination in common dab and demonstrate how gene duplication and translocation can contribute to the evolution of novel sex-determining systems in flatfishes.

genomics↗