bioRxiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/bioRxiv

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2023.03.22.533785

AG3D: A low-cost educational 3D printable toolkit for agarose gel electrophoresis

Barwick, M. W.·Fanucci, S.·Mbanxa, S.·Buthelezi, K.·Jukes, M. D.·Abrahams, G. L.·Prinsloo, E.
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Access to desktop additive manufacturing is growing and the argument could be made for 3D printers to be standard laboratory equipment. The power of the printers lies in the democratisation of scientific equipment. Traditional agarose gel electrophoresis forms a cornerstone of molecular biology research, teaching and learning. Reliable electrophoresis is dependent on a number of factors which include standardized commercial equipment with respect to casting trays, combs, horizontal tanks and power supplies. The aforementioned systems come at a high initial cost; this is before factoring in the costs of standard electrophoresis grade agarose and associated reagent pricing. Here, we present a basic method for the additive manufacturing of a simple 3D printable agarose gel electrophoresis (AGE) unit with a built-in gel casting tray for standard size microscope slide-based AGE; named AG3D. The system presented was validated using different standard agarose-buffers (Tris Acetate EDTA and Tris Borate EDTA) and commercially available base-pair ladders. We provide a comparison between the AG3D and a commercial AGE system in respect to resolving power of the electrophoresis unit and discuss the overall reduction in cost afforded by the AG3D electrophoresis toolkit. The method presented has the potential for application in low resource educational environments by: O_LISignificantly lowering costs through the reduction of reagents (agarose, buffers etc). C_LIO_LIAllow for the use of low sample volumes. C_LIO_LIProviding an open-source toolkit for modification whether for research or teaching & learning C_LI Graphical abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=64 SRC="FIGDIR/small/533785v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (16K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@135b120org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1ffca3eorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@36ce4corg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@21dfb0_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG Specifications table O_TBL View this table: org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1e4a30forg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@18d57c9org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@7e8b77org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1f64979org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@51e36f_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_TBL C_TBL

Explore related subjects

scientific communication and educationPreprint

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Barwick, M. W., Fanucci, S., Mbanxa, S., Buthelezi, K., Jukes, M. D., Abrahams, G. L., Prinsloo, E.. 2023-03-24. AG3D: A low-cost educational 3D printable toolkit for agarose gel electrophoresis. https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.03.22.533785

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

bioRxiv2026

Evaluating Large Language Models as Tools to Navigate Researchers in Rapidly Evolving Research Landscapes: A Case Study in Cancer Drug Response Prediction

Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as promising tools for assisting researchers in automating and accelerating the synthesis of literature reviews. However, their reliability is a significant concern due to issues like factual inaccuracies and hallucinations. The key question is whether LLMs can reliably provide comprehensive, up-to-date overviews and analyses. This study evaluates the performance of three leading LLMs (OpenAI's ChatGPT, Google's Gemini, and DeepSeek) on the complex task of generating a comprehensive survey paper on deep learning for cancer Drug Response Prediction (DRP). By testing both standard and Deep Research (DR) / Deep Think (DT) modes of LLMs with prompts of varying detail, this paper assesses key academic dimensions, including reference management, content quality, and analytical depth. Key findings reveal that while DR modes of LLMs significantly improve reliability by eliminating hallucinations, performance variations exist across models and prompts. A trade-off between reference quantity and integration quality was observed, and even the best-performing models lacked the analytical depth of human experts, often requiring extensive human supervision. The study concludes that LLMs currently serve as powerful assistive tools but still cannot replace the critical validation and synthesis provided by human researchers. Choosing the best LLM to use depends on the task in hand, while several strategies can be implemented to improve the produced output.

scientific communication and education↗
bioRxiv2023

"When I talk about it, my eyes light up!" Impacts of a national laboratory internship on community college student success

Participation in technical/research internships may improve undergraduate graduation rates and persistence in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM), yet little is known about the benefits of these activities a) for community college students, b) when hosted by national laboratories, and c) beyond the first few years after the internship. We applied Social Cognitive Career Theory (SCCT) to investigate alumni perspectives about how CCI at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL) impacted their academic/career activities. We learned that alumni had low confidence and expectations of success in STEM as community college students. Participation in CCI increased their professional networks, expectations of success, and STEM skills, identity, and self-efficacy/confidence. Hispanic/Latinx alumni recalled the positive impact of mentors who prioritized personal connections, and women valued "warm" social environments. We propose several additions to the SCCT model, to better reflect the supports and barriers to STEM persistence for community college students.

scientific communication and education↗
bioRxiv2023

Insights from a survey of mentorship experiences by graduate and postdoctoral researchers

Mentorship is vital for early career researchers in training positions, allowing them to navigate the challenges of work and life in research environments. However, the quality of mentorship received by trainees can vary by investigator and by institution. One challenge faced by those hoping to improve trainee mentorship is that the extent to which mentorship is offered to and experienced by research trainees is not well characterized. To address this knowledge gap, we conducted a survey to examine the quality of mentorship received by trainees in research environments, to identify characteristics of positive and negative mentorship, and to highlight best practices to improve trainee mentorship. We received 2,114 responses from researchers at graduate and postdoctoral career stages worldwide. Quantitative analysis showed that at least [~]25-45% of respondents were dissatisfied with some aspects of their mentorship. Qualitative responses revealed that common issues in mentorship include unclear expectations in research and mentoring interactions, lack of guidance, and inadequate support of trainee independence and career goals. Our findings also identified key mentorship elements desired by trainee mentees. Based on trainee suggestions, we describe strategies for individual mentors, departments, and institutions to improve the training experience for graduate and postdoctoral researchers.

scientific communication and education↗