bioRxiv · 10.1101/2023.02.07.527517
Systematic comparison of risky choices in humans and monkeys
Abstract
The past decades have seen tremendous progress in fundamental studies on economic choice in humans. However, elucidation of the underlying neuronal processes requires invasive neurophysiological studies that are met with difficulties in humans. Monkeys as evolutionary closest relatives offer a solution. The animals display sophisticated and well-controllable behavior that allows to implement key constructs of proven economic choice theories. However, the similarity of economic choice between the two species has never been systematically investigated. We investigated compliance with the independence axiom (IA) of expected utility theory as one of the most demanding choice tests and compared IA violations between humans and monkeys. Using generalized linear modeling and cumulative prospect theory (CPT), we found that humans and monkeys made comparable risky choices, although their subjective values (utilities) differed. These results suggest similar fundamental choice mechanism across these primate species and encourage to study their underlying neurophysiological mechanisms.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Seak, L. C. U., Ferrari-Toniolo, S., Jain, R., Nielsen, K., Schultz, W.. 2023-02-08. Systematic comparison of risky choices in humans and monkeys. https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.02.07.527517
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.