bioRxiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/bioRxiv

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2022.11.30.518613

Are we moving the dial? An evaluation of sex- and gender-based analysis integration in Canadian Institutes of Health Research-funded research from 2009-2020

Stranges, T.·Namchuk, A.·Splinter, T.·Moore, K.·Galea, L.
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

BackgroundSex and gender impacts health outcomes and disease risk throughout life. The health of women and members of the Two-Spirit, Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer or Questioning, Intersex, and Asexual (2S/LGBTQ+) community is often compromised as they experience delays in diagnosis. Distinct knowledge gaps in the health of these populations has prompted funding agencies to mandate incorporation of sex and gender into research. Sex-and gender-informed research perspectives and methodology increases rigor, promotes discovery, and expands the relevance of health research. Thus, the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) implemented a Sex and Gender-based Analysis (SGBA) framework recommending the inclusion of SGBA in project proposals in 2010 and then mandating the incorporation of SGBA into grant proposals in 2019. To examine whether this mandate resulted in increased mention of sex or gender in funded research abstracts, we searched the publicly available database of grant abstracts funded by CIHR to analyze the percentage of abstracts that mentioned sex or gender of the population to be studied. To better understand broader health equity issues we also examined whether the funded grant abstracts mentioned either female-specific health research or research within the 2S/LGBTQ+ community. ResultsWe categorized a total of 8,964 Project and Operating grant abstracts awarded from 2009- 2020 based on their study of female-specific or a 2S/LGBTQ+ populations or their mention of sex or gender. Overall, under 3% of grant abstracts funded by CIHR explicitly mentioned sex and/or gender, as 1.94% of grant abstracts mentioned sex, and 0.66% mentioned gender. As one of the goals of SGBA is to inform on health equity and understudied populations with respect to SGBA, we also found that 5.92% of grant abstracts mentioned female-specific outcomes, and 0.35% of grant abstracts focused on the 2S/LGBTQ+ community. ConclusionsAlthough there was an increased number of funded grants with abstracts that mentioned sex and 2S/LGBTQ+ health across time, these increases were less than 2% between 2009 to 2020. The percentage of funded grants with abstracts mentioning female-specific health or gender differences did not change significantly over time. The percentage of funding dollars allocated to grants in which the abstracts mentioned sex or gender also did not change substantially from 2009-2020, with grant abstracts mentioning sex or female-specific research increasing by 1.26% and 3.47% respectively, funding allocated to research mentioning gender decreasing by 0.49% and no change for 2S/LGBTQ+-specific health. Our findings suggest more work needs to be done to ensure the public can evaluate what populations will be examined with the funded research with respect to sex and gender to advance awareness and health equity in research. HighlightsO_LIThe percentage of funded grants in which the abstracts mentioned sex or gender in health research remained largely unchanged from 2009 to 2020 with the largest increase of 1.57% for those mentioning sex. C_LIO_LITotal funding amounts for grants that mentioned sex or gender in the abstract stagnated or declined from 2009 to 2020. C_LIO_LIThe percentage of funded grants in which the abstracts focusing on female-specific health did not change across 2009-2020, but the percentage of funding dollars increased by 3.47%. C_LIO_LIThe percentage of grants in which the abstracts mentioned 2S/LGBTQ+-specific health more than tripled across 2009-2020 but remained less than 1% of all funded grants. C_LI

Source connections

Explore related subjects

scientific communication and educationPreprint

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Stranges, T., Namchuk, A., Splinter, T., Moore, K., Galea, L.. 2022-12-01. Are we moving the dial? An evaluation of sex- and gender-based analysis integration in Canadian Institutes of Health Research-funded research from 2009-2020. https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.11.30.518613

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

bioRxiv2026

Evaluating Large Language Models as Tools to Navigate Researchers in Rapidly Evolving Research Landscapes: A Case Study in Cancer Drug Response Prediction

Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as promising tools for assisting researchers in automating and accelerating the synthesis of literature reviews. However, their reliability is a significant concern due to issues like factual inaccuracies and hallucinations. The key question is whether LLMs can reliably provide comprehensive, up-to-date overviews and analyses. This study evaluates the performance of three leading LLMs (OpenAI's ChatGPT, Google's Gemini, and DeepSeek) on the complex task of generating a comprehensive survey paper on deep learning for cancer Drug Response Prediction (DRP). By testing both standard and Deep Research (DR) / Deep Think (DT) modes of LLMs with prompts of varying detail, this paper assesses key academic dimensions, including reference management, content quality, and analytical depth. Key findings reveal that while DR modes of LLMs significantly improve reliability by eliminating hallucinations, performance variations exist across models and prompts. A trade-off between reference quantity and integration quality was observed, and even the best-performing models lacked the analytical depth of human experts, often requiring extensive human supervision. The study concludes that LLMs currently serve as powerful assistive tools but still cannot replace the critical validation and synthesis provided by human researchers. Choosing the best LLM to use depends on the task in hand, while several strategies can be implemented to improve the produced output.

scientific communication and education↗
bioRxiv2023

MolecularWebXR: Multiuser discussions about chemistry and biology in immersive and inclusive VR

MolecularWebXR is a new website for education, science communication and scientific peer discussion in chemistry and biology, based on modern web-based Virtual Reality (VR) and Augmented Reality (AR). With no installs as it is all web-served, MolecularWebXR enables multiple users to simultaneously explore, communicate and discuss concepts about chemistry and biology in immersive 3D environments, by manipulating and passing around objects with their bare hands and pointing at different elements with natural hand gestures. User may either be present in the same real space or distributed around the world, in the latter case talking naturally with each other thanks to built-in audio features. Although MolecularWebXR is most immersive when running in the web browsers of high-end AR/VR headsets, its WebXR core also allows participation by users with consumer devices such as smartphones, possibly inserted into cardboard goggles for deeper immersivity, or even in computers and tablets. MolecularWebXR comes with preset VR rooms that cover topics from general, inorganic and organic chemistry, biophysics and structural biology, and general biology; besides, new content can be added at will through moleculARwebs PDB2AR tool or by contacting the lead authors. We verified MolecularWebXRs ease of use and versatility by people aged 12-80 years old in entirely virtual sessions or in mixed real-virtual sessions at various science outreach events, in courses at the bachelor, masters and early doctoral levels, in scientific collaborations, and in conference lectures. MolecularWebXR is available for free use without registration at https://molecularwebxr.org, and a blog post version of this preprint with embedded videos is available at https://go.epfl.ch/molecularwebxr-blog-post.

scientific communication and education↗
bioRxiv2023

Willingness of Japanese people in their 20s, 30s and 40s to pay for genetically modified foods

The application of genetically modified (GM) technology to food products has increased worldwide. The adaptation has extended to conventional grains and animal products, such as salmon. However, in Japan, the publics acceptance of GM foods is low and experts and policymakers need to know the publics preference for various types of GM foods. Therefore, this study aims to clarify and compare the preferences for various GM foods among Japanese people in their 20s, 30s, and 40s, using the Willingness-to-pay (WTP) indicator. An online survey with 1122 valid responses from people in their 20s-40s was used for analysis. The results showed that the percentages of willingness to purchase various items were as follows - GM blue roses (n = 628; 56%), tomatoes fertilized with GM oil cake (n = 519; 46.3%), potato chips made from GM potatoes (n = 489; 43.6%), chicken thighs fed on GM corn (n = 472; 42.1%), corn flakes made from GM corn (n = 471; 42.0%), GM apples (n = 420; 37.4%), wine brewed with GM yeast (n = 416; 37.1%), GM tomatoes (n = 408; 36.4%), GM chicken thighs (n = 360; 32.1%), GM salmon (n = 349; 31.1%). Comparing the WTP discount rates for animal and plant foods, it was around 20% for animal products (GM chicken thighs = 17.8% and GM salmon = 19.5%), and 15-35% for plant foods (GM corn flakes = 24.1%, GM tomatoes = 17.2%, GM potato chips = 16.4%, GM yeast wine = 36.7%, GM apples = 25.3%). The WTP discount rates were 11.9% for tomatoes fertilized with GM oil cake compared with 17.2% for GM tomatoes, and 21.5% for GM-fed animal products compared with 17.8% for chicken thighs fed with GM corn. Therefore, the WTP values of GM animal foods were lower than GM plant foods and ornamental products.

scientific communication and education↗