bioRxiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/bioRxiv

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2022.11.21.517308

Does AlphaFold predict the spatial structure of a protein from physics or recognize it (its main parts and their association) using databases?

Finkelstein, A. V.
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The great success of the AlphaFold programs poses the following questions: (i) What is the main reason for this success? (ii) What exactly do AlphaFolds do: prediction of the 3D protein structure based on its amino acid sequence and knowledge of the protein physics or recognition of this 3D structure, based on the similarity between some parts of its amino acid sequence and parts of sequences with already known 3D structures? The answers given in this paper are: The main reason for the tremendous success of the AlphaFold is (i) the usage of huge protein databases, which already cover all or almost all of the protein superfamilies existing in nature; (ii) using these databases and the resulting multiple sequence alignments and coevolutionary information (like correlations in pairs and especially in triplets of amino acid residues in the contacting chain regions), AlphaFold recognizes a 3D structure of the examined amino acid sequence by a similarity of this sequence (or its parts) to related sequences with already known 3D structures. Concluding, I have to emphasize that this paper does not diminish the merit and utility of AlphaFold; it only explains the basis of its success.

Explore related subjects

bioinformaticsPreprint

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Finkelstein, A. V.. 2022-11-22. Does AlphaFold predict the spatial structure of a protein from physics or recognize it (its main parts and their association) using databases?. https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.11.21.517308

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

bioRxiv2026

Uncovering Viral Signals Across Cell Populations in Colorectal Cancer

Viral sequences have been detected in colorectal cancer, but their cellular and anatomical distribution remains poorly resolved. We aimed to establish a cell-type-resolved map of viral reference-associated RNA signals across colorectal cancer, tumour-adjacent normal tissue, and healthy colon. We repurposed human-unmapped reads from single-cell RNA sequencing libraries generated in ten publicly available studies. We retained cell-barcode and unique molecular identifier information, removed duplicate molecules, and aligned reads to a curated human-associated viral reference using three aligners. Viral signals were analysed across cell types, tissue conditions, and colorectal segments. We used participant-grouped repeated cross-validation to evaluate tissue-condition classification and screened an independent paired colorectal cancer proteomics cohort for compatible peptide matches. The study included 547 libraries from 112 participants, including 49 with matched colorectal cancer and tumour-adjacent normal samples, and approximately 415,000 cells spanning ten major cell populations. Viral reference-associated RNA signals differed across epithelial, immune, stromal, and vascular compartments, tissue conditions, and anatomical regions of the colon. Of 318 independent healthy-reference viral-load comparisons, seven involving six virus-cell-type groups remained significant after Benjamini-Hochberg correction, including plasma-cell HHV-7 and HHV-6B and mast-cell HCV-2. Cell-type-resolved viral features distinguished colorectal cancer, tumour-adjacent normal tissue, and healthy colon in participant-grouped validation; random forest achieved a macro-AUC of 0.957 (SD 0.028), with HERV-K113 as the leading quantitative feature. An independent proteomic screen identified peptide matches compatible with 20 candidate viral groups. We established a cell-type-resolved map of viral reference-associated RNA signals across colorectal tissue conditions and anatomical regions. By identifying candidate viral signals in epithelial and immune compartments, this map provides a basis for investigating virus-host pathways involved in tumour biology, immune regulation, and antigen-presentation states, and could help prioritise future combination strategies pairing virus-directed or virus-mimetic approaches with standard treatment or immune checkpoint blockade.

bioinformatics↗
bioRxiv2026

Statistical significance testing for spatial domain detection in spatial transcriptomics

In spatial transcriptomics, domain-detection methods group platform-specific spatial measurement units--cells, bins or multicellular spots--into spatial domains for comparing molecular programs, cellular composition and interactions among tissue regions. However, the number of candidate domains detected in the same tissue can vary with user-specified parameters or model-selection criteria. Whether candidate domains should be merged can be framed as a test of a single-domain null hypothesis, under which each gene has constant mean expression across all spatial units in the combined region. However, testing candidate domains on the same gene-expression data used to detect them may induce post-selection bias and yield anti-conservative p-values, increasing the risk of oversegmentation. To address these challenges, we introduce SigDoTS (statistical Significance testing for Domain deTection in Spatial transcriptomics), a hypothesis-testing framework for spatial domain detection. SigDoTS uses hierarchical testing to determine which candidate domains to retain or merge, with adjustment for family-wise error control. It accounts for gene-gene covariance and spatial dependence and computes p-values by rerunning the upstream domain-detection pipeline on datasets simulated under the fitted single-domain null. In simulations, SigDoTS controlled the type I error rate at the root node under the single-domain null and improved recovery of the true spatial domains when multiple domains were present. In human dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, SigDoTS retained superficial and deep Layer 6 domains but merged Layer 3 candidate domains across different initial numbers of candidate domains. In ovarian and colorectal cancers, SigDoTS retained epithelial domains with different gene-expression programs and local immune environments, together with immune, stromal and vascular domains.

bioinformatics↗
bioRxiv2026

ASD Neuro Agentic (ANA): An Agentic Framework for Feature Discovery and Cross Site Generalization in Autism fMRI Classification

Classifiers of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) from resting state functional MRI rarely generalize across sites, and many reported accuracies are inflated by data leakage.We show that an agentic artificial intelligence framework, ASD Neuro Agentic (ANA), whose language model agents propose features from the literature and researcher input while fixed tools perform every calculation, can search auditably for site independent classifiers while controlling the leakage. In 1,028 participants from 17 ABIDE I centers, ANA tested 71 pipelines and selected a ComBat harmonized ensemble of tangent space connectivity models from six parcellations and 98 public connectivity derivatives. In leave one center out testing, the ensemble reached an area under the curve of 0.814 (95% CI, 0.773 to 0.841), outperforming ASD DiagNet and ASD SAENet. Predictive connectivity was mainly reduced in ASD. Agentic AI offers a systematic and efficient approach to exploring, evaluating, and identifying pipelines as model selection grows complex.

bioinformatics↗